Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

OxQQme

(2,550 posts)
Wed Mar 22, 2017, 01:14 AM Mar 2017

Dakota Access pipeline: ING sells stake in major victory for divestment push

>"The financial giant ING has sold its stake in the $2.5bn loan financing the Dakota Access pipeline, the latest victory for the anti-pipeline divestment campaign that comes as the project is set to begin transporting oil.

The Dutch banking and financial services company is the first of a group of 17 banks to divest from the loan that financed the project. ING’s share in the loan was $120m.

The buyer of the loan was not disclosed. Under the terms of the sale, ING will retain some of the risk in the event of default.

ING’s decision followed a 10 February meeting with the Standing Rock Sioux tribe, which argued that the pipeline’s route – crossing under the Missouri river just north of the tribe’s reservation – threatened its water source and violated its treaty rights.

“We are heartened that ING has made the conscience decision to remove itself from a project that tramples on the rights of sovereign nations,” the Standing Rock Sioux tribal chairman, Dave Archambault, said in a statement."<

more:
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2017/mar/21/dakota-access-pipeline-ing-sells-stake-loan-standing-rock

5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Dakota Access pipeline: ING sells stake in major victory for divestment push (Original Post) OxQQme Mar 2017 OP
I realllllly want to know who the buyer was... Lucinda Mar 2017 #1
Rozneft, maybe? BadgerMom Mar 2017 #2
Or maybe the Rump Organization. (I know, same difference.) nt Buns_of_Fire Mar 2017 #4
Wish an investor would hold 51% ownership would then reroute the pipeline. N/t SleeplessinSoCal Mar 2017 #3
perhaps the Con's dad, Pootie? or a group of ru$$ians? KewlKat Mar 2017 #5
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Dakota Access pipeline: I...