General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsRussia stands to BENEFIT from climate change. So DT's climate change denial,
and that of other Republicans, must be understood in that context.
The profiteers don't care about fighting climate change -- they welcome it.
https://nexusmedianews.com/putin-is-turning-russia-into-an-agricultural-powerhouse-climate-change-could-help-ec263cb99a6e#.mxmf0cfwx
Climate change will create winners and losers or rather, mostly losers, and a few winners. Impoverished equatorial countries face the harshest impacts. Wealthy Western nations will cope better. Russia may fare the best of all, largely as an accident of geography.
This is good new for Vladimir Putin. He wants Russia to become an agricultural powerhouse. Climate change could help.
Putin is upping crop production in an effort to become, as he said, the worlds largest supplier of healthy, ecologically clean and high-quality food. This year, Russia surpassed the United States as the worlds biggest exporter of wheat. Russian farming is booming. Plutocrats are snatching up arable land. In the years ahead, global warming could bolster Russian agricultural supremacy.
Vladimir Putin previously said that an increase of two or three degrees wouldnt be so bad for a northern country like Russia. We could spend less on fur coats, and the grain harvest would go up. Hes at least partly right. While climate change threatens to stunt wheat production in the United States, in Russia its a different story.
Rising temperatures will thaw Russias icy reaches. Melting permafrost will damage infrastructure and release noxious methane gas, but it will also expand arable land. A 2011 study found global warming could add more than 400,000 square miles of potential farmland, an area more than twice the size of California. That fact has investors looking to Siberia with dollar signs in their eyes.
dalton99a
(81,516 posts)Binkie The Clown
(7,911 posts)pnwmom
(108,980 posts)while they can.