Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
11 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

JustABozoOnThisBus

(23,362 posts)
2. There were lines?
Wed Mar 15, 2017, 06:10 PM
Mar 2017

I got nothing from her "interview".

There were questions, maybe answers, we're not privileged to know.

Pretty much a non-story.

still_one

(92,320 posts)
3. In other words, the FBI will only release information publicly if it hurts Democrats, otherwise, it
Wed Mar 15, 2017, 06:11 PM
Mar 2017

is very sensitive and highly classified


Got it...........

KewlKat

(5,624 posts)
6. sadly that seems to be the case..........or by this non-answer maybe they have the Con
Wed Mar 15, 2017, 06:23 PM
Mar 2017

by the balls and they can't tell the public......yet?

Amaryllis

(9,525 posts)
4. Remember what Shiff said on RAchel recently that the FBI is about building a case to prosecute
Wed Mar 15, 2017, 06:19 PM
Mar 2017

and the intel committees are about national security, and sometimes there is a conflict
between the two. It's possible that declassifying would blow the investigation.

 

GliderGuider

(21,088 posts)
8. Almost a Glomar.
Wed Mar 15, 2017, 06:26 PM
Mar 2017

It looks like there is something incomprehensibly enormous behind door #2.

I still think Cointel Comey is the good guy here. He's going by the book until he has the targets all acquired. Then, and only then, it turns into a skeet shoot.

Unless you'd rather that he's a bad guy and you're all fucked six ways from Sunday?

lindysalsagal

(20,718 posts)
11. She's shaken. It's gotta be really, really bad. Like, impeachment bad.
Wed Mar 15, 2017, 07:14 PM
Mar 2017

If the fbi had proof fRump colluded with putin, this is exactly how she'd react. If it meant our election of fRump is totally false, this is how she'd look. And it would make everything else that's happened in the last 2 months make sense.

It is also corroborrated by all of Rachel's findings.

This is the look a senator would have if she knew we'd be jailing the current administration and installing the next in command: The house speaker: Ryan.

This would be an historic embarrassment of our country.

And I wouldn't be the least bit surprised.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Sen. Feinstein on meeting...