Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

leftstreet

(36,116 posts)
Fri Jun 29, 2012, 01:43 PM Jun 2012

What counts as 'insurance' under the new law?

Recently doctors, clinics, hospitals, healthcare professionals have been responding to the healthcare crisis by offering their own nonprofit 'wellness' and medical coverage plans to uninsured patients.

Will that count as 'insurance' under the new law? Or will you have to prove you're contributing to some Insurance/Big Pharma CEO's retirement fund to avoid a penalty.

11 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

sinkingfeeling

(51,474 posts)
1. I don't exactly know what you're talking about. The 'wellness' plan I have
Fri Jun 29, 2012, 02:46 PM
Jun 2012

is sponsored by my insurance company. It pays for weight control programs, screenings for bone hardness, and biometric screenings of blood pressure, blood sugar, BMI, etc.

leftstreet

(36,116 posts)
2. All of that, but available directly from Drs, clinics, hosps. etc
Fri Jun 29, 2012, 04:01 PM
Jun 2012

Not through insurers

Many healthcare organizations have been offering 'pooled' coverage like that without using an insurance company as a middle person.

Will that count under the new law?

sinkingfeeling

(51,474 posts)
3. Doubt it. Insurance is to cover your medical needs. None of those things
Fri Jun 29, 2012, 04:13 PM
Jun 2012

would help in the case of heart attack or cancer.

leftstreet

(36,116 posts)
4. Blood pressure screening (etc) is part of your medical needs
Fri Jun 29, 2012, 04:56 PM
Jun 2012

Maybe we're not talking about the same thing

cbayer

(146,218 posts)
5. As I understand it, the ACA requires that you have a plan that provides at least
Fri Jun 29, 2012, 04:59 PM
Jun 2012

catastrophic coverage (high deductible) and preventative care.

While the plans you describe probably do the second, I doubt very much that they do the first.

leftstreet

(36,116 posts)
7. Thank you
Fri Jun 29, 2012, 05:02 PM
Jun 2012

Maybe catastrophic coverage will be cheap enough people can keep any nonprofit wellness check plans they have through their Drs and clinics, etc

Thanks

 

HopeHoops

(47,675 posts)
8. RE: catastrophic coverage - the ACA eliminates the problem of using it.
Fri Jun 29, 2012, 05:10 PM
Jun 2012

In the past, if you dropped comprehensive in favor of catastrophic, you were subject to rejection should you subsequently apply to return to comprehensive coverage. I went through the process. It's a royal pain in the ass and a not of nail biting.



cbayer

(146,218 posts)
9. I think that's going to be a good alternative.
Fri Jun 29, 2012, 05:13 PM
Jun 2012

Some physicians have established "boutique" practices to avoid dealing with insurance at all. They offer basic care, including some tests and labs, for a set fee.

If you have that and a catastrophic policy with no lifetime max (another ACA requirement), you should be covered for just about everything you might need

SickOfTheOnePct

(7,290 posts)
11. My understanding is that catastrophic coverage is banned except for those under 30
Mon Jul 2, 2012, 10:57 AM
Jul 2012

***edited: banned except for those under 30 and those with proven financial hardship.

leftstreet

(36,116 posts)
6. Anyone? Does no one know?
Fri Jun 29, 2012, 05:00 PM
Jun 2012

Odd. There have been so many ardent supporters of the ACA here. Surely someone has the answers.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»What counts as 'insurance...