General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsAsked About Millions Losing Care, Ryan Says 'Lowering Costs' Is What Matters
By MATT SHUHAM Published MARCH 7, 2017, 5:23 PM EDT
House Speaker Paul Ryan (R-WI) on Tuesday called estimates that millions of people could lose health care coverage under an Obamacare replacement a bogus metric, and said lowering costs for everyone was more important.
Ryan also said he could guarantee that a finalized proposal would have enough votes to pass the House of Representatives.
By some estimates, 10 million people could lose coverage. Is that acceptable? one reporter asked Ryan at a press conference Tuesday afternoon. Though the non-partisan Congressional Budget Office has not released its analysis of the House GOPs Obamacare replacement plan, Standard & Poors released such an analysis Tuesday. S&P found that 2 to 4 million people enrolled in Obamacares individual marketplaces could lose coverage under the American Health Care Act, in addition to 4 to 6 million people currently covered by Medicaid.
What matters is that we're the lowering costs of health care and giving people access to affordable health care plans, Ryan responded. The government will always win the war on government-run plans, saying, if we mandate everybody buys what we say they have to buy, then the government will always estimate that theyll buy it.
more
http://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/ryan-lowering-costs-is-what-matters
Renew Deal
(81,869 posts)Phentex
(16,334 posts)I think it's the equivalent of "Too Bad!" which is probably what Trump will tweet next.
LakeArenal
(28,835 posts)annabanana
(52,791 posts)I live close to NYC. I have "access" to just about everything in the world.
vlyons
(10,252 posts)It's about lowering the cost of doing business for insurance companies. Thus raising their profits. The Republican guiding principle is privatize profits and socialize costs of doing business on the backs of tax payers.
The 2 main reasons why Republicans want to kill the ACA:
1) Wall St and rich people don't want to pay the 3.8% surtax on investment income.
2) Insurance companies don't want to be limited to a "mere" 20% profit of customer premiums.
There are more reasons of course, and they are all about insurance profits. Republicans don't see constituents as human beings, they see us as potential profit centers.
dalton99a
(81,566 posts)Fred Sanders
(23,946 posts)The ACA eliminated these highly profitable scam plans so that any ACA plan had to have minimum coverage that actually was real insurance...but the Republicans already know that and want them back to give the illusion of health insurance....scoundrels.
Ilsa
(61,696 posts)for routine care to get screenings, etc. And more women will need gyn care through hospitals. Mammogram scheduling will get backlogged again.
COLGATE4
(14,732 posts)"I've got mine. Fuck you!"
herding cats
(19,566 posts)The only people who will see a reduction are young healthy males from what I've been able to understand.
Liberal In Texas
(13,568 posts)Not people.
Vinca
(50,300 posts)I have access to buying a mansion with gold toilets if I want one. Access isn't the problem. The problem is buying a $12,000 policy with a $4,000 tax credit.