Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsTrump's EPA: Fuck science!
https://newrepublic.com/article/141174/epas-science-office-removed-science-mission-statement"The EPAs Science Office Removed Science From Its Mission Statement
BY EMILY ATKIN
March 7, 2017
When President Donald Trump took office in late January, his administration began tweaking the language on government websites. Some of the more prominent changes occurred on Environmental Protection Agency pagesa mention of human-caused climate change was deleted, as was a description of international climate talks. The shifts were small, but meaningful; many said they signaled a new era for the EPA, one in which the agency would shy away from directly linking carbon emissions to global warming and strive to push Trumps America First message.
Those initial tweaks were documented by the Environmental Data and Governance Initiative, a group of scientists and academics who spend their free time tracking changes to about 25,000 federal government webpages. On Tuesday, they shared their latest finding with the New Republic: The EPAs Office of Science and Technology Policy no longer lists science in the paragraph describing what it does.
This is probably the most important thing weve found so far, said Gretchen Gehrke, who works on EDGIs website tracking team. The language changes here are not nuancedthey have really important regulatory implications.
The EPAs Office of Science and Technology has historically been in charge of developing clean water standards for states. Before January 30 of this year, the website said those standards were science-based, meaning they were based on what peer-reviewed science recommended as safe levels of pollutants for drinking, swimming, or fishing. Since January 30, though, the reference to science-based standards has disappeared. Now, the office, instead, says it develops economically and technologically achievable standards to address water pollution.
..........
EDGI argues these changes signal the EPAs new directionone that prioritizes business interests over public health and scienceunder new Administrator Scott Pruitt, who has close ties to fossil-fuel companies. Pruitt didnt mention public health once in his first speech to agency employees, instead focusing on improving the EPAs relationship with private interests. In a tweet after his speech, Pruitt said he was committed to working with several types of stakeholders on on environmental stewardship. He did not mention environmentalists as one of those stakeholders. "....(More at link)
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
2 replies, 983 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (3)
ReplyReply to this post
2 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Trump's EPA: Fuck science! (Original Post)
Tanuki
Mar 2017
OP
spanone
(135,857 posts)1. K&R...
Phoenix61
(17,009 posts)2. Traditional values of environmental stewardship
WTF is that? Love Canal days? Fucking slimy oil industry whore.