Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

FarLeftFist

(6,161 posts)
Thu Jun 28, 2012, 11:21 PM Jun 2012

Paul Krugman: The REAL Winners

So the Supreme Court — defying many expectations — upheld the Affordable Care Act, a k a Obamacare. There will, no doubt, be many headlines declaring this a big victory for President Obama, which it is. But the real winners are ordinary Americans — people like you.

How many people are we talking about? You might say 30 million, the number of additional people the Congressional Budget Office says will have health insurance thanks to Obamacare. But that vastly understates the true number of winners because millions of other Americans — including many who oppose the act — would have been at risk of being one of those 30 million.

So add in every American who currently works for a company that offers good health insurance but is at risk of losing that job (and who isn’t in this world of outsourcing and private equity buyouts?); every American who would have found health insurance unaffordable but will now receive crucial financial help; every American with a pre-existing condition who would have been flatly denied coverage in many states.

In short, unless you belong to that tiny class of wealthy Americans who are insulated and isolated from the realities of most people’s lives, the winners from that Supreme Court decision are your friends, your relatives, the people you work with — and, very likely, you. For almost all of us stand to benefit from making America a kinder and more decent society.

The rest: http://www.nytimes.com/2012/06/29/opinion/the-real-winners.html?_r=1&smid=tw-NytimesKrugman&seid=auto

40 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Paul Krugman: The REAL Winners (Original Post) FarLeftFist Jun 2012 OP
Obama ProSense Jun 2012 #1
I'm a Krugman groupie. SusanaMontana41 Jun 2012 #7
Me too. We need a fan club and a magazine. And Paul Krugman trading cards. Squinch Jun 2012 #23
Count me in! ailsagirl Jun 2012 #27
*high fives* me too! He is highly intelligent and spot-on tropicanarose Jun 2012 #33
Joe Conason ain't bad either! ailsagirl Jun 2012 #35
Yep. Krugman & Howard Dean. patrice Jul 2012 #38
and krugman does not say nice things if he does not have to. nt seabeyond Jun 2012 #2
But it's a tax... kentuck Jun 2012 #3
But when they pay taxes in Europe and get health care from the government, it's good! Sigh... freshwest Jun 2012 #4
This isn't remotely like European health-care, for which I, as a tourist, SEVERAL times paid $0. WinkyDink Jun 2012 #20
+1000 Given the revolving door, it's fast becoming the same thing RufusTFirefly Jun 2012 #31
Straight to the heart of the matter. Thanks Krugman and thanks tor posting it. freshwest Jun 2012 #5
Krugman really explains this, in clear and simple terms. CaliforniaPeggy Jun 2012 #6
who knew hfojvt Jun 2012 #8
Yeah. Countries like the UK and Sweden do that too. Nye Bevan Jun 2012 #9
oh, but that depends on the tax hfojvt Jun 2012 #11
If your income is below the federal tax-filing threshold, there is no health tax to pay muriel_volestrangler Jun 2012 #21
Last year, I myself paid no federal income tax. AlbertCat Jun 2012 #36
You can fly to the UK today, get sick and be taken care of by their system, won't cost you a cent.. Fumesucker Jun 2012 #13
Not true. Nye Bevan Jun 2012 #22
Actually, it's an in theory over in practice thing brislington Jun 2012 #28
THAT IS SINGLE PAYER Skittles Jul 2012 #37
Who would think that the lie that the ACA forces insurance purchase would not have died by now? bornskeptic Jun 2012 #16
if that is the case hfojvt Jun 2012 #30
You forgot about the broccoli. We all just love that broccoli talking point. It's so compelling. Squinch Jun 2012 #24
+1brazillion Myrina Jul 2012 #39
K&R SunSeeker Jun 2012 #10
Unless you are one of the 15% that is expensively sick eridani Jun 2012 #12
Even bronze level coverage, unlike Medicare, has a limit on out of pocket expenses. bornskeptic Jun 2012 #14
Wonderful. Alll the poor slobs who can only afford shitty bronze coverage are now "stupid." eridani Jun 2012 #15
It's not likely that many people could only afford bronze coverage. bornskeptic Jun 2012 #18
The same income percent is a HUGE chunk of money for people earning less than that eridani Jun 2012 #19
K & R Scurrilous Jun 2012 #17
I trust Mr. Krugman ailsagirl Jun 2012 #25
".... a kinder and more decent society...." Turbineguy Jun 2012 #26
K&R highplainsdem Jun 2012 #29
Krugman knows...and those of us who are women paying higher premiums, have pre-existing conditions.. Brooklyn Dame Jun 2012 #32
what I love the most about this SemperEadem Jun 2012 #34
So true. This man has no fear. He is sometimes the only voice saying the unpopular but true thing.nt Honeycombe8 Jul 2012 #40

freshwest

(53,661 posts)
4. But when they pay taxes in Europe and get health care from the government, it's good! Sigh...
Fri Jun 29, 2012, 12:52 AM
Jun 2012

I guess no one will ever get it...

 

WinkyDink

(51,311 posts)
20. This isn't remotely like European health-care, for which I, as a tourist, SEVERAL times paid $0.
Fri Jun 29, 2012, 07:17 AM
Jun 2012

Are you under the misapprehension that paying a private company for h-c insurance is the same as being taxed by the Federal govt?

Do you think your buying a car is the same as the govt's supplying Jeeps to the Army?

Do you think having publicly-funded education is the same as paying private-school tuition?

RufusTFirefly

(8,812 posts)
31. +1000 Given the revolving door, it's fast becoming the same thing
Fri Jun 29, 2012, 02:18 PM
Jun 2012

It alarms me greatly the way more and more people seem unable (or unwilling) to differentiate the public from the private.

Matters are made worse by the fact that so many of our "public spaces" are privately owned.

Shopping malls are a good example.
So is Facebook, frankly.

hfojvt

(37,573 posts)
8. who knew
Fri Jun 29, 2012, 01:39 AM
Jun 2012

that forcing everybody to buy health insurance

would "make America a kinder and more decent society"?


We should end homelessness next by mandating for everybody to rent an apartment. Call it the Affordable Rent Act.


Then we could end lonliness by mandating that everybody buy a cellphone (and associated plan). The Affordable App Act.

Then we could end boredom by mandating that everybody buy an xbox. The Affordable Game Act.


Think of the kindness and decency we could create with just a few more mandates. Just give me a chance to open another bookstore and then mandate everybody buy $500 worth of books every month. There's some kindness and decency I could believe in.

Now all we have to do is make everybody eat their vegetables. The Affordable Ketchup Act.

Nye Bevan

(25,406 posts)
9. Yeah. Countries like the UK and Sweden do that too.
Fri Jun 29, 2012, 02:07 AM
Jun 2012

They force everyone to pay tax, which pays for health coverage. There is no way to "opt out" of this system. My heart just bleeds for those poor Europeans, who are forced into paying taxes for health insurance.

hfojvt

(37,573 posts)
11. oh, but that depends on the tax
Fri Jun 29, 2012, 03:42 AM
Jun 2012

If taxes are progressive, then many people can opt out of them

Simply by "virtue" of being too poor to pay them.

Last year, I myself paid no federal income tax.

 

AlbertCat

(17,505 posts)
36. Last year, I myself paid no federal income tax.
Sat Jun 30, 2012, 06:59 PM
Jun 2012

You and Exxon.

Maybe we should subsidize people a little instead of corporations that make billions.

Besides income tax is not the only tax.

Oh, and everybody will need health care sooner or later... everyone. It's not a choice. Buying books (at your store) is a choice.

Fumesucker

(45,851 posts)
13. You can fly to the UK today, get sick and be taken care of by their system, won't cost you a cent..
Fri Jun 29, 2012, 04:44 AM
Jun 2012

Visitors to the US on the other hand are warned that getting sick here in the land of the free can financially ruin them and visitors are urged to get a temporary insurance policy.

That's the difference, they have a system that covers *everyone* via actual real taxes and we still don't and still won't.

brislington

(15 posts)
28. Actually, it's an in theory over in practice thing
Fri Jun 29, 2012, 11:50 AM
Jun 2012

In theory visitors from abroad do pay, but not very much. When visiting our relatives at Christmas out entire family got sick (que blame for British food...actually a bug going round) me , my wife and two kids. From shaky memory it cost us about $100 when converted, not including prescriptiuon antibiotics which were about $30. However, the doctor, who was my mother-in-laws family doctor and had treated their family for years, came out to us at her home, through the snow, on Christmas day. This was the only time I ever paid.

On other occasions I have been treated in UK completely for free, just because the docotor couldn't be bothered with or didn't know how to do the paperwork or take hte money. They are just not normally geared up for taking money since it rarely is necessary.

Skittles

(153,202 posts)
37. THAT IS SINGLE PAYER
Sun Jul 1, 2012, 03:50 AM
Jul 2012

THEY PAY TAXES FOR ACTUAL HEALTH CARE

HERE IT IS HEALTH INSURANCE; actual HEALTH CARE not so assured

bornskeptic

(1,330 posts)
16. Who would think that the lie that the ACA forces insurance purchase would not have died by now?
Fri Jun 29, 2012, 06:04 AM
Jun 2012

The whole point of yesterday's decision was that all the mandate does is assess a tax on people who can afford to purchase insurance and don't want to do so. Actually, the number of people who end up buying health insurance because of the mandate will be very small. Most of the newly insured, other than those insured through Medicaid, will be people who want to have insurance, and find that it has suddenly become available at an affordable price through the premium subsidies.

Squinch

(51,021 posts)
24. You forgot about the broccoli. We all just love that broccoli talking point. It's so compelling.
Fri Jun 29, 2012, 11:02 AM
Jun 2012

eridani

(51,907 posts)
12. Unless you are one of the 15% that is expensively sick
Fri Jun 29, 2012, 04:04 AM
Jun 2012

In that case, your crappy Bronze-level coverate will leave you bankrupt and possibly dead anyway.

bornskeptic

(1,330 posts)
14. Even bronze level coverage, unlike Medicare, has a limit on out of pocket expenses.
Fri Jun 29, 2012, 05:50 AM
Jun 2012

Of course it would be rather stupid to opt for the bronze level coverage rather than the standard silver if you have such an expensive condition. But even with the bronze you will be a lot better off than someone with the same condition and no insurance.

eridani

(51,907 posts)
15. Wonderful. Alll the poor slobs who can only afford shitty bronze coverage are now "stupid."
Fri Jun 29, 2012, 06:01 AM
Jun 2012

Bronze will give you bankruptcy and homelessness in the event of serious illness. How do I know? All you have to do is to look at MA, where 50% of bankruptcies are STILL due to medical costs, and funding for public hospitals has been totally gutted.

bornskeptic

(1,330 posts)
18. It's not likely that many people could only afford bronze coverage.
Fri Jun 29, 2012, 07:04 AM
Jun 2012

For example, a single person 30 years old would have to have an income over about $35,000 before he or she could save any money on premium cost by choosing bronze rather than silver. It works out that way because premium cost for people with incomes below 400% of the poverty level is capped at a percentage of income, and if the unsubsidized cost of 60%AV (bronze) insurance is higher than that cap, the cap would still determine premium cost, and so the person would have to pay as much for bronze coverage as for silver.

eridani

(51,907 posts)
19. The same income percent is a HUGE chunk of money for people earning less than that
Fri Jun 29, 2012, 07:10 AM
Jun 2012
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Personal_income_in_the_United_States

Median income for single people is about $33K, meaning that half make less that that. And you are forgetting that older people can be charged 3X as much for the same coverage.

All you need to know about ACA can be found out by looking at MA, where medical bankruptcies are still 50% of all bankruptcies. Most of those people are insured, but it doesn't do them any good.

ailsagirl

(22,899 posts)
25. I trust Mr. Krugman
Fri Jun 29, 2012, 11:28 AM
Jun 2012

So to hear his thoughts about ACA gives me a sense of relief. Krugman never pulls punches. For better or worse, we can absolutely rely on his wisdom, and the thoughts he expressed in this op-ed are welcome indeed.
Thanks a million for posting!!

Turbineguy

(37,372 posts)
26. ".... a kinder and more decent society...."
Fri Jun 29, 2012, 11:35 AM
Jun 2012

And that's why Krugman is the enemy of the Republican Party.

SemperEadem

(8,053 posts)
34. what I love the most about this
Fri Jun 29, 2012, 10:16 PM
Jun 2012

is that I can now contemplate other options for myself and my life that do not include me staying in a job I have grown to hate and live in an area of the country I despise just because the job has got good benefits.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Paul Krugman: The REAL Wi...