Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsCBO: Obamacare Costing The Feds A Third Less Than Expected
Source: TPM
The Congressional Budget Office said Friday that its projections for the federal government's spending on the Affordable Care Act's coverage provisions in 2019 are now a third lower than what they were when the law was passed in 2010.
CBO Director Keith Hall said in written responses to questions posed by the House Budget Committee that the CBO expects the federal government to spend $148 billion in 2019 on the law's coverage provisions, down from the $214 billion estimated when the law was passed.
Hall cited a number of reasons for why the law is costing the federal government less than originally expected. One is that less people are using the individual market than anticipated, lowering the feds' spending on things like the subsidies for insurance premiums. Additionally, Medicare and Medicaid's costs are coming in under expectations, as are the costs of private insurance -- a slowdown in health care costs Hall speculated could have been driven by the recession.
"Although it is unclear how much of that slowdown is attributable to the recession and its aftermath and how much is attributable to other factors, the slower growth has been sufficiently broad and persistent to persuade the
agencies to significantly lower their projections of federal costs for health care," Hall said.
CBO Director Keith Hall said in written responses to questions posed by the House Budget Committee that the CBO expects the federal government to spend $148 billion in 2019 on the law's coverage provisions, down from the $214 billion estimated when the law was passed.
Hall cited a number of reasons for why the law is costing the federal government less than originally expected. One is that less people are using the individual market than anticipated, lowering the feds' spending on things like the subsidies for insurance premiums. Additionally, Medicare and Medicaid's costs are coming in under expectations, as are the costs of private insurance -- a slowdown in health care costs Hall speculated could have been driven by the recession.
"Although it is unclear how much of that slowdown is attributable to the recession and its aftermath and how much is attributable to other factors, the slower growth has been sufficiently broad and persistent to persuade the
agencies to significantly lower their projections of federal costs for health care," Hall said.
Read more: http://talkingpointsmemo.com/dc/cbo-third-obamacare-costs?utm_content=buffer8bfe3&utm_medium=social&utm_source=twitter.com&utm_campaign=buffer
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
7 replies, 1078 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (10)
ReplyReply to this post
7 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
CBO: Obamacare Costing The Feds A Third Less Than Expected (Original Post)
demmiblue
Mar 2017
OP
Too fricking late - where were the responsible people to get this message out sooner?
flamingdem
Mar 2017
#5
ffr
(22,671 posts)1. Do away with it entirely, dammit!
Said the red state voter with black lung disease.
dalton99a
(81,559 posts)2. It's got Obama's name on it
spanone
(135,855 posts)3. K&R...
Zambero
(8,965 posts)4. Oh the horror!
They were clearly WRONG on forecasting what this law was supposed to do with specified funding. Gov't spending ALWAYS overruns, so why is this particular program so completely off track??? How can we trust Obamacare when the facts to date show it to be utterly WRONG!
flamingdem
(39,314 posts)5. Too fricking late - where were the responsible people to get this message out sooner?
and now we'll see it destroyed.
dalton99a
(81,559 posts)7. Excellent point.
global1
(25,261 posts)6. This Should Be Breaking News On All The Cable Channels And Newspapers.....
but they're totally distracted by Trump - Russia. Anything that has to do with the real issues that the Repugs are undoing gets swept under the rug.
Can't report on these projections - cause the Repugs are going to unveil their replacement plan for ACA this week.