Rachel just reported that Sessions will go back to the Judiciary Committee on Monday,

[dflprincess]

answer questions and "amend" his testimony.

So if he "amends" ("I thought you meant the other Russians, Senator Franken.&quot his testimony and tell the truth this time, does that mean he's off the hook for perjury?

[rzemanfl]

1. I don't know if he is allowed a "do over." I have seen yes and no answers. n/t

[DURHAM D]

2. I thought he is just going to amend in writing,

not under oath.

[KewlKat]

7. yes, in writing, not in person.

[dflprincess]

8. I heard "in person" on Rachel's show

she did say it was "breaking".

[DURHAM D]

9. I was watching. Didn't hear it. nt

[panader0]

3. He's had quite a while o "amend" his testimony

and he chose not to do so. I'm no expert, but I think he should still
be on the hook for perjury.

[Solly Mack]

4. Probably.

Unfortunately.

[Mr. Ected]

5. I don't recall that Bill Clinton was able to "amend" his testimony

Although I'm pretty sure the Republicans offered him that option at the time.

#not#

[Stinky The Clown]

6. Not in person. He will amend and then answer questions in writing

Another GOPee sake and mirrors stunt.

[wishstar]

10. I just heard Lawrence O'Donnell say Grassley is refusing to let Sessions go back to answer question

Lawrence said Sen. Grassley is not going to let Sessions face more questioning. But presumably, Sessions can amend his testimony just in writing. Sounds like Grassley is afraid things could get even worse for Sessions if he is questioned further.

[frogmarch]

11. It wouldn't surprise me if he's

then off the hook - and is allowed to "unrecuse" himself.