Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

TomClash

(11,344 posts)
Thu Jun 28, 2012, 10:34 AM Jun 2012

Amy Howe's Explanation from SCOTUS blog in plain english

"In Plain English: The Affordable Care Act, including its individual mandate that virtually all Americans buy health insurance, is constitutional. There were not five votes to uphold it on the ground that Congress could use its power to regulate commerce between the states to require everyone to buy health insurance. However, five Justices agreed that the penalty that someone must pay if he refuses to buy insurance is a kind of tax that Congress can impose using its taxing power. That is all that matters. Because the mandate survives, the Court did not need to decide what other parts of the statute were constitutional, except for a provision that required states to comply with new eligibility requirements for Medicaid or risk losing their funding. On that question, the Court held that the provision is constitutional as long as states would only lose new funds if they didn't comply with the new requirements, rather than all of their funding."

4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Amy Howe's Explanation from SCOTUS blog in plain english (Original Post) TomClash Jun 2012 OP
Thanks. I've sort of pieced that together, but this is the best description yet. HopeHoops Jun 2012 #1
That's kind of what they do jsmirman Jun 2012 #3
Yes, that's pretty clear slackmaster Jun 2012 #2
I have increasingly noticed that the "Democratic" justices are just as mindlessly partisan as the Leopolds Ghost Jun 2012 #4

Leopolds Ghost

(12,875 posts)
4. I have increasingly noticed that the "Democratic" justices are just as mindlessly partisan as the
Thu Jun 28, 2012, 11:47 AM
Jun 2012

RW assholes on the court.

In this case, they mindlessly voted in favor of a Kelo-like decision to compel Americans to purchase a private good -- one which has nothing to do with improving the health care system and everything to do with making private insurance (as a commodified good) a requirement of citizenship -- indeed, making it a requirement of breathing -- on Hillary Clinton's theory that "uninsured deadbeats" are responsible for weighing down the health care system and driving up premiums by using hospital services.

WHICH IS A CORE TENET RIGHT WING THEORY OF HEALTH CARE.

But the Dems on the high court voted one way because of which President voted for the bill -- the President who said that a mandate was like forcing homeless people to buy a house.

Which is the next step. Philly just passed a law making it illegal to feed the homeless.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Amy Howe's Explanation fr...