Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
71 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
How Hillary Could Become President: Anatomy of a Miracle (Original Post) SticksnStones Feb 2017 OP
Works for me. Let's get on it. oasis Feb 2017 #1
That's the spirit! SticksnStones Feb 2017 #2
Ok, then we need to get busy on the House! herding cats Feb 2017 #3
or we could just build a time machine, and go back in time before the election and make sure putitinD Feb 2017 #4
Well I did preface it as a miracle occurring... SticksnStones Feb 2017 #7
This is actually what I was calling for in the first few days following the election. butdiduvote Feb 2017 #5
well Afromania Feb 2017 #6
Don't we get Hail Mary passes in politics, too? SticksnStones Feb 2017 #9
Hey don't get me wrong Afromania Feb 2017 #15
.. SticksnStones Feb 2017 #20
I agree. Way too much could happen in 2 years n/t TexasBushwhacker Feb 2017 #49
Anyone else you would think to install besides Hillary? The field seems wide open in this plan. jmg257 Feb 2017 #8
I'm not done being heartbroken over this election SticksnStones Feb 2017 #10
Same butdiduvote Feb 2017 #32
That would be up to the House of Representatives to decide. oasis Feb 2017 #18
we can't wait that long to get rid of them yurbud Feb 2017 #11
I don't want to wait til 2018. The baboon needs to go before he has patricia92243 Feb 2017 #12
Yeah but then we get Pence or Ryan... SticksnStones Feb 2017 #14
Skipped a step: convict in Senate by 2/3 vote onenote Feb 2017 #13
And they'd have to do it twice at the same time. longship Feb 2017 #47
Would be easier to build a time machine and change election ksoze Feb 2017 #16
Does Hillary Need To Be A Member Of Congress To Become Speaker?....nt global1 Feb 2017 #17
Apparently, no SticksnStones Feb 2017 #22
You have to get 67 Senators too. rateyes Feb 2017 #19
As long as we're in Fantasyland, we can handle that, too Jim Lane Feb 2017 #29
Ah...the OP (me) was counting on the utter disgust of loyal Republican Americans SticksnStones Feb 2017 #39
Seems unfair njhoneybadger Feb 2017 #58
Yes, that's definitely a problem Jim Lane Feb 2017 #60
Yeah. They always forget about the conviction by a two-thirds majority of the Senate. WillowTree Feb 2017 #30
Who would give up their seat to Hillary? el_bryanto Feb 2017 #21
It is in fact, a real scenario albeit a far fetched one SticksnStones Feb 2017 #24
yes, so far, the speaker has always been a member, but that's not actually a requirement. unblock Feb 2017 #27
Give it up BainsBane Feb 2017 #23
Why? What do you imagine we actually do here besides discuss stuff and toss ideas around? SticksnStones Feb 2017 #25
I don't see the point BainsBane Feb 2017 #28
There's a whole lot of us SticksnStones Feb 2017 #33
Hillary Clinton will never be President. DefenseLawyer Feb 2017 #26
THAT is almost word for word what my therapist said! SticksnStones Feb 2017 #35
I agree, but it's sad and unfortunate. LisaM Feb 2017 #52
Actually, that's not just how get Hillary. If we just win the house kydo Feb 2017 #31
You do understand that impeachment alone doesn't remove them from office, don't you? WillowTree Feb 2017 #36
I understand many things, and I do know how it works kydo Feb 2017 #43
You said....... WillowTree Feb 2017 #46
Again it was a comment on the OP kydo Feb 2017 #61
Nice dream. Doreen Feb 2017 #34
Better sit down, it hurts to consider the line up SticksnStones Feb 2017 #37
Damn, it all suck a big one. Doreen Feb 2017 #41
Orrin Hatch, the President Pro Tempore of the Senate. WillowTree Feb 2017 #38
Why? jalan48 Feb 2017 #40
Or...and hear me out...why not? SticksnStones Feb 2017 #42
It's extremely convoluted. Why subject Americans to this? jalan48 Feb 2017 #44
No more convoluted than what Americans are currently being subjected to... SticksnStones Feb 2017 #45
Americans are up in arms about Trump and we want to take that energy and make it about Clinton? jalan48 Feb 2017 #48
Trump won't make it that long... NoGoodNamesLeft Feb 2017 #50
Dream on. The Velveteen Ocelot Feb 2017 #51
Most of my dreams are the sweat soaked nightmares of Presidents Pence or Ryan SticksnStones Feb 2017 #54
She botched her 1st and 2nd chances to win the WH Larkspur Feb 2017 #53
I wanna say "says you" but instead I'll say agree to disagree SticksnStones Feb 2017 #55
Wow! Yours is the perfect intersection of two fallacies. LanternWaste Feb 2017 #59
Say hi to Godot for me when you see him DFW Feb 2017 #56
2 Years is too long itcfish Feb 2017 #57
I'd rather just get rid of Trump/Pence and forget about that Kimchijeon Feb 2017 #62
Yeah.....uh no. SticksnStones Feb 2017 #64
yes, but be that as it may- Kimchijeon Feb 2017 #67
The republicans will just aim their demonization at whomever we put up next. SticksnStones Feb 2017 #68
Can we stop beating up on people for being heartbroken over the election ffs butdiduvote Feb 2017 #63
I don't know if you meant to call me out on that but I'm in exactly that same camp SticksnStones Feb 2017 #65
No, no not you butdiduvote Feb 2017 #66
People cope with loss differently BainsBane Feb 2017 #70
sounds like a plan. nt TheFrenchRazor Feb 2017 #69
Better retake the Senate too since Impeachment Hearings are held there. Motown_Johnny Feb 2017 #71

herding cats

(19,568 posts)
3. Ok, then we need to get busy on the House!
Wed Feb 15, 2017, 03:42 PM
Feb 2017

Seriously, if we could retake some power there in 2018 it would be a huge victory for us!!

putitinD

(1,551 posts)
4. or we could just build a time machine, and go back in time before the election and make sure
Wed Feb 15, 2017, 03:43 PM
Feb 2017

the big idiot doesn't cheat. probably not going to happen.

butdiduvote

(284 posts)
5. This is actually what I was calling for in the first few days following the election.
Wed Feb 15, 2017, 03:45 PM
Feb 2017

I said let's just find a way to make Hillary Speaker of the House. Forget all of the other way-more-complicated fixes; put her 2nd in line for succession. Everyone made fun of me, though haha.

Afromania

(2,771 posts)
6. well
Wed Feb 15, 2017, 03:47 PM
Feb 2017

Only problem is we sort of need Trumps dumb ass out right now. So you'd have to add a layer of actual investigation to whatever Pence did/does. Then impeachment and Hillary as president. It's roundabout and wonky as hell but we've reached the whatthefuckever portion of the show.

SticksnStones

(2,108 posts)
9. Don't we get Hail Mary passes in politics, too?
Wed Feb 15, 2017, 03:50 PM
Feb 2017

I say yes...plus I find it relieves stress to dream of day with Hillary as President.

Afromania

(2,771 posts)
15. Hey don't get me wrong
Wed Feb 15, 2017, 04:01 PM
Feb 2017

I'm not saying not to dream the dream I'm encouraging it because we've gone way past sanity, insanity, grab your ass insanity and the Twilight Zone was roughly 5 miles ago.

SticksnStones

(2,108 posts)
10. I'm not done being heartbroken over this election
Wed Feb 15, 2017, 03:51 PM
Feb 2017

Not ready to fall in love again.

And as they say repubs fall in line, Dems fall in love ~

oasis

(49,426 posts)
18. That would be up to the House of Representatives to decide.
Wed Feb 15, 2017, 04:10 PM
Feb 2017

Hillary would most likely be their choice since she's the most qualified person on the planet.

longship

(40,416 posts)
47. And they'd have to do it twice at the same time.
Wed Feb 15, 2017, 04:55 PM
Feb 2017

Impeach and remove Pence first, and Drumpf appoints a new veep.

Impeach Drumpf first, Pence becomes president and appoints new veep.

House speaker Hillary never comes near White House.

ksoze

(2,068 posts)
16. Would be easier to build a time machine and change election
Wed Feb 15, 2017, 04:03 PM
Feb 2017

That scenario would indeed be a miracle. Right now I would settle for anyone but Trump at the top.

SticksnStones

(2,108 posts)
22. Apparently, no
Wed Feb 15, 2017, 04:13 PM
Feb 2017
The Constitution does not require that the Speaker be an elected House Representative, though every Speaker so far has been an elected Member of the House. The Speaker is second in the United States presidential line of succession, after the Vice President and ahead of the President pro tempore of the U.S. Senate.

Source:
Speaker of the United States House of Representatives - Wikipedia


 

Jim Lane

(11,175 posts)
29. As long as we're in Fantasyland, we can handle that, too
Wed Feb 15, 2017, 04:27 PM
Feb 2017

A bunch of large blue states split themselves into many smaller states. The large influx of new Democrats gives the plan enough supporters to be two-thirds of the newly enlarged Senate.

Presumably the OP thought that that part of the scenario was too obvious to need mentioning.

SticksnStones

(2,108 posts)
39. Ah...the OP (me) was counting on the utter disgust of loyal Republican Americans
Wed Feb 15, 2017, 04:39 PM
Feb 2017

And they vote the bums out.

Miracle...I did say miracle so yeah, I know ~

njhoneybadger

(3,910 posts)
58. Seems unfair
Wed Feb 15, 2017, 05:14 PM
Feb 2017

that if California was a country its GDP would put it 6th in the world and it gets only two senators.We have an election and 3 million votes don't count.

 

Jim Lane

(11,175 posts)
60. Yes, that's definitely a problem
Wed Feb 15, 2017, 05:27 PM
Feb 2017

My recollection is that, after the 2012 elections, if you added up the votes cast in the most recent election for each seat in the Senate (spread over different years because of staggered terms), Democratic candidates received a majority of the total votes. Republicans held the Senate majority anyway, because of the Constitutionally mandated malapportionment of the Senate. Hurray for Vermont, but most of the small states that are overrepresented are deep red.

WillowTree

(5,325 posts)
30. Yeah. They always forget about the conviction by a two-thirds majority of the Senate.
Wed Feb 15, 2017, 04:27 PM
Feb 2017

Like that's going to happen.

el_bryanto

(11,804 posts)
21. Who would give up their seat to Hillary?
Wed Feb 15, 2017, 04:12 PM
Feb 2017

How do you keep other ambitious politicians from not wanting to capitalize on this situation themselves (assuming its a real possibility)?

Bryant

SticksnStones

(2,108 posts)
24. It is in fact, a real scenario albeit a far fetched one
Wed Feb 15, 2017, 04:15 PM
Feb 2017

No one has to give up their seat. One doesn't need to be an elected member of the House, they just need to be elected by the House as their leader.

unblock

(52,383 posts)
27. yes, so far, the speaker has always been a member, but that's not actually a requirement.
Wed Feb 15, 2017, 04:22 PM
Feb 2017

it sounds weird for the speaker not to be a member, but actually it's not much different from the senate, which is presided by the vice-president of the united states, who is not a member of the senate.

one notable difference is that there's no provision for the speaker to break ties.

BainsBane

(53,076 posts)
23. Give it up
Wed Feb 15, 2017, 04:14 PM
Feb 2017

It's not going to happen. Let's focus on what we can do to oppose Trump rather than indulging in fantasies.

SticksnStones

(2,108 posts)
25. Why? What do you imagine we actually do here besides discuss stuff and toss ideas around?
Wed Feb 15, 2017, 04:19 PM
Feb 2017

Sure there's a strong element of rallying and reporting but more often than not, it's a place to discuss anything that supports democrats. I don't find that to be particularly indulgent.

Peace.

BainsBane

(53,076 posts)
28. I don't see the point
Wed Feb 15, 2017, 04:23 PM
Feb 2017

anymore than imagining the tooth fairy is going to save us from Trump.

I badly wanted Hillary to be president, and the loss was very hard for me, but it's time to move on.

SticksnStones

(2,108 posts)
33. There's a whole lot of us
Wed Feb 15, 2017, 04:29 PM
Feb 2017

who see all this corruption and manipulation coming to light and are furious and feel cheated.

And maybe a thread like this is cathartic.

That's all...

LisaM

(27,843 posts)
52. I agree, but it's sad and unfortunate.
Wed Feb 15, 2017, 04:59 PM
Feb 2017

Thinking about what a seamless transition this would have been compared to the chaos we're seeing now (which was utterly predictable) makes me almost physically ill.

kydo

(2,679 posts)
31. Actually, that's not just how get Hillary. If we just win the house
Wed Feb 15, 2017, 04:28 PM
Feb 2017

then impeach the orange bozo group, we still get our first female prez, Nancy. I'm cool Hillary, Nancy, basically any dem, I am so there!

Okay, my district was a flip. We flipped it blue. whoo hoo. And I am doing my part to keep it that way. Got a re-occurring donation going to Congresswoman Murphy's rel-election campaign. What you all doing to win the house back?

Cause if we can wait until after the 2018 elections to impeach orange fuck and we win the house we get a dem for prez, none of this eddie munster shit. But one, we must win the house and two, that's a long time orange turd has only been in there one month and look at the mess, can we make it till 2018, without ww3 or as a whole country? God help us all... PLEASE!

kydo

(2,679 posts)
43. I understand many things, and I do know how it works
Wed Feb 15, 2017, 04:48 PM
Feb 2017

Your question would better be asked of the OP. I was commenting on winning the house which we need done period.

WillowTree

(5,325 posts)
46. You said.......
Wed Feb 15, 2017, 04:51 PM
Feb 2017

"If we just win the House then impeach the orange bozo group, we still get our first female prez."

And I'm saying no, impeachment doesn't get you that. It will just get you a trial in the Senate where you're not going to get 67 votes to convict.

kydo

(2,679 posts)
61. Again it was a comment on the OP
Wed Feb 15, 2017, 05:48 PM
Feb 2017

Which is after the miracle impeachment, (as it would be a miracle if this house really moved forward), and the miracle conviction, theory.

Because in reality we are fucked!

The point of my post that you commented on was since we are dreaming here, it didn't need to be Hillary. It could be anybody. (BTW I love Hillary. She won! And should be in the White House right now!)

But regardless we must win back the house. And that doesn't really mean much because in order stop this craziness it needs to be done ASAP before any more damage to our country happens. Waiting until after the 2016 elections might be too late.

Right now in the real world more then orange face is involved with this act of treason. Pretty much everyone in control of things is involved.

To cope we dream about impossible things. I was commenting on that. Not taking a bar exam on constitutional law.

Doreen

(11,686 posts)
34. Nice dream.
Wed Feb 15, 2017, 04:31 PM
Feb 2017

This brings me to a question on how our government works though, if Trump, Pence, and Ryan were all killed at the same time who is the next person to go into the presidency? I am not suggesting killing anyone lets say there is an earthquake that does this. I am just curious because I just do not know how the line works.

SticksnStones

(2,108 posts)
37. Better sit down, it hurts to consider the line up
Wed Feb 15, 2017, 04:34 PM
Feb 2017

After Ryan it's Orrin Hatch, then Rex Tillerson, then Steve Mnuchin

SticksnStones

(2,108 posts)
45. No more convoluted than what Americans are currently being subjected to...
Wed Feb 15, 2017, 04:51 PM
Feb 2017


and it's just words in a thread ~

Peace

jalan48

(13,901 posts)
48. Americans are up in arms about Trump and we want to take that energy and make it about Clinton?
Wed Feb 15, 2017, 04:55 PM
Feb 2017

No thanks.

 

NoGoodNamesLeft

(2,056 posts)
50. Trump won't make it that long...
Wed Feb 15, 2017, 04:58 PM
Feb 2017

He'll be lucky to make it through the end of the month at the rate of the leaks about Russia.

The Velveteen Ocelot

(115,894 posts)
51. Dream on.
Wed Feb 15, 2017, 04:58 PM
Feb 2017

Let's say Steps 1 and 2 are accomplished, and Hillary is elected to Congress and becomes Speaker of the House. A long shot, but arguably possible.

After that it falls apart. Let's say Trump is impeached by the House and convicted by a 2/3 majority of the Senate, which is what would be needed to remove him from office.

Keep in mind that Trump and Pence would not be impeached or tried at the same time. So when Trump is removed, Pence becomes president. As president he must appoint a new Vice President to replace himself, according to Section 2 of the 25th Amendment: "Whenever there is a vacancy in the office of the Vice President, the President shall nominate a Vice President who shall take office upon confirmation by a majority vote of both Houses of Congress." That person, not the Speaker of the House, is now next in line for the presidency.

Of course, the impeachment of Pence could begin in the meantime, while his appointed VP is in the confirmation process, but as we saw with the B. Clinton debacle, that process is very slow. Maybe if the Dems controlled both houses of Congress they could hold out long enough to get Pence impeached, tried and removed before his VP appointment could be confirmed. But this would also create tremendous instability in the government, which could backfire badly on the majority party. Impeachment is a political act that can become an exploding cigar, and the Clinton episode only increased his popularity.

In short, it ain't gonna happen.

 

Larkspur

(12,804 posts)
53. She botched her 1st and 2nd chances to win the WH
Wed Feb 15, 2017, 05:01 PM
Feb 2017

She does not deserve a third, especially an irregular path to the WH.

 

LanternWaste

(37,748 posts)
59. Wow! Yours is the perfect intersection of two fallacies.
Wed Feb 15, 2017, 05:27 PM
Feb 2017

Wow! Yours is the perfect intersection of two logical fallacies. Post hoc ergo prmopter hoc and It Does Not Follow.

Emotive responses, though convenient for a lazy mind, ad little of substance. It's merely more cheerleading.

Good luck!!!

Kimchijeon

(1,606 posts)
62. I'd rather just get rid of Trump/Pence and forget about that
Wed Feb 15, 2017, 05:51 PM
Feb 2017

People hate Hillary too much in reality, aside from the hugbox of DU.

Kimchijeon

(1,606 posts)
67. yes, but be that as it may-
Wed Feb 15, 2017, 08:01 PM
Feb 2017

the rightwing media hate machine loves to hate on Hillary/the Clintons nonstop, and there's a huge segment of the population that's been watching Fox news and listening to hate radio for decades. They've long since been brainwashed- so personally I'd rather not keep on trying for Hillary this or that, in any case.

I just feel the more important thing currently is just getting rid of the dingbats who are unjustly in the White House!
That's all.

SticksnStones

(2,108 posts)
68. The republicans will just aim their demonization at whomever we put up next.
Wed Feb 15, 2017, 08:25 PM
Feb 2017


And a republican house and senate will never impeach their own.

538 today addressed the beating repubs might very well take in the midterms.

At this point, as long as it's legal, I'll entertain any notion of getting the White House back.

And Hillary Clinton, more than any other dem can take a republican pounding.

butdiduvote

(284 posts)
63. Can we stop beating up on people for being heartbroken over the election ffs
Wed Feb 15, 2017, 05:56 PM
Feb 2017

For many of us, Hillary's presidency was a dream dashed. It's not just about politics. It was about having a woman who we saw many of our own struggles in ascend to the top, about feeling like we live in a country where women like us belong, about a sense of empowerment that others may get elsewhere but we get from Hillary.

We're not stupid. We know the chances are slim to none. We know there's a constitution; we don't need anyone to condescendingly tell us to read it. We don't need you to inform us there are other politicians on the Dem side who you personally like better. We know that. Hillary means something to us. Let us express ourselves without being shouted down to "get over it" or "go read the constitution, dummy" 5,000 times a day.

SticksnStones

(2,108 posts)
65. I don't know if you meant to call me out on that but I'm in exactly that same camp
Wed Feb 15, 2017, 06:00 PM
Feb 2017

I'm still very much heartbroken about the loss. And all the revelations coming at us at lightening speed are dredging up a lot of that broken feeling.

HRC !

butdiduvote

(284 posts)
66. No, no not you
Wed Feb 15, 2017, 06:03 PM
Feb 2017

I'm just seeing users repeatedly talking down to people for posts like your OP, and the smug condescension is very off-putting to me. We don't have to shut up about our feelings on, not just the current situation, but the election and Clinton's candidacy itself.

BainsBane

(53,076 posts)
70. People cope with loss differently
Thu Feb 16, 2017, 05:16 AM
Feb 2017

For me, it's painful to see these sorts of posts because I so wanted her to be president and know that it isn't possible now. The fantasy makes it more painful for me because it reminds me of my dashed hopes.

I do feel we weren't able to publicly grieve on this site due to all the recriminations about the election, but groups like Pantsuit Nation have been cathartic.

 

Motown_Johnny

(22,308 posts)
71. Better retake the Senate too since Impeachment Hearings are held there.
Thu Feb 16, 2017, 05:19 AM
Feb 2017

You might need Nancy Pelosi "disappeared" too. Hillary being appointed Speaker is a bigger long shot than (D)s retaking both houses of Congress in '18.


Latest Discussions»General Discussion»How Hillary Could Become ...