Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsNYTimes - One Week before the election....and NOW...
Week before the election:_ _ _ _ _ _ _
NOW:
From this tweet:
Link to tweet
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
5 replies, 1124 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (7)
ReplyReply to this post
5 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
NYTimes - One Week before the election....and NOW... (Original Post)
CousinIT
Feb 2017
OP
CincyDem
(6,404 posts)1. One definition of insanity:
Hoping someone will see that which he/she is paid to not see.
Comey was paid well to not see Russian activity.
pbmus
(12,422 posts)2. Comey and Rudy are in bed together and should be convicted.
spanone
(135,891 posts)3. comey has proven his allegiance
wishstar
(5,272 posts)4. Are same sources who said "no links" in Nov, trying to quiet things down by saying "no collusion"?
Apparently the NY Times' sources can no longer deny the contacts, but are saying no evidence found yet of collusion.
NY Times story killed the momentum and impact of the Trump/Russia revelations before election with article about sources saying "no links" so I have to wonder if those same sources are once again trying to contain the current media firestorm by saying there were contacts but "no collusion". It worked back in November to take wind out of sails of the other media reports.
CousinIT
(9,261 posts)5. Most likely. A cursory glance may appear that there was "no collusion" however
this entire thing STINKS to the moon and back and needs a thorough independent investigation.