General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsPolitico: Dems struggle over SCOTUS opposition strategy
The Democratic Party is splintering over its strategy for handling President Donald Trumps Supreme Court nominee, with liberals upset that Senate Democrats arent taking a harder line and moderates fretting about appearing too obstructive.
In the middle is Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, who's facing one of the biggest moments in his career. Battles over Supreme Court nominees are epic struggles between the parties, and emotions are running hotter than normal this time around after Republicans blocked President Barack Obamas nominee Merrick Garland from even getting a hearing for almost all of last year.
Some Democrats want to reprise those same hardball tactics. But Schumer and his allies are trying to convince all the factions in his party to move deliberately, and wait to mount any full-scale opposition until after a pick has been named and they've had a chance to dig into nominee's record.
Schumer, for his part, has repeatedly said he will fight any nomination that isn't "mainstream," declining to match McConnell's strategy of a unilateral blockade so early in the process.
more: http://www.politico.com/story/2017/01/trump-supreme-court-democrats-strategy-234441
CincyDem
(6,386 posts)JHan
(10,173 posts)They stole a SCOTUS seat FFS.
Do we need to draw a goddamn map ??
dalton99a
(81,578 posts)vlyons
(10,252 posts)that the Pussy-Grabber's pick will be a totally unacceptable dork. Give the Senate Dems time to dig into the nominee's record, past, and conflicts. Then we can REVEAL the slimey facts about the nominee.
Me.
(35,454 posts)It seems rather logical as long as after a name is offered they put up a strong opposition