In a first, Alaska divorce courts will now treat pets more like children
Divorces can be messy. Leaving aside the very raw emotions involved, there is the matter of splitting property.
Who gets the house? Who gets the couch? Who gets the dog?
If one of those items seems different to you, thats probably because you, like many Americans, consider pets to be more like family members than furniture. But courts do not. In the eyes of the law, animals are property. So although pet custody battles are often passionate and sometimes truly wacky, courts think of them more prosaically: as part of the property distribution in a divorce.
[How much is a pet dog worth? A court will soon decide.]
Thats why an amendment to Alaskas divorce statutes, which took effect last week, is making waves in the world of animal law. It makes Alaska the first state in the country to require courts to take into consideration the well-being of the animal and to explicitly empower judges to assign joint custody of pets. In a blog post, the Animal Legal Defense Fund called the well-being provision groundbreaking and unique.
It is significant, said David Favre, a Michigan State University law professor who specializes in animal law. For the first time, a state has specifically said that a companion animal has visibility in a divorce proceeding beyond that of property that the court may award custody on the basis of what is best for the dog, not the human owners.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/animalia/wp/2017/01/24/in-a-first-alaska-divorce-courts-will-now-treat-pets-more-like-children/?utm_term=.85cd40495eac