Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

highplainsdem

(49,005 posts)
Fri Jan 27, 2017, 04:49 PM Jan 2017

WSJ: Trump told Congressional leaders he wanted to replace Electoral College w/ nat'l popular vote

http://www.wsj.com/articles/trumps-first-week-governing-without-a-script-1485544924

The tone for the tumultuous week was set on Saturday, Mr. Trump’s first full day in office, when he ordered his press secretary Mr. Spicer to push back on widely reported data that showed that the crowd witnessing his inauguration was smaller than his predecessor’s audience. The president wasn’t happy with Mr. Spicer’s performance at the press briefing, and afterward berated him at the White House, said a person with knowledge of the discussion.

Two days later, the president had senior lawmakers over to the White House for an informal gathering. The group included the House and Senate leadership. During the gathering, the talk turned to campaigns, elections and voter fraud.

Mr. Trump then told the group that he was interested in getting rid of the Electoral College and replacing it with a national popular vote, say people who attended. Mr. Trump lost the popular vote to Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton, a fact that has irritated the president to the point that he has called for a national probe of alleged voter fraud.

Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, a Kentucky Republican, spoke up, pointing him to the 2000 recount in Florida that lasted more than a month until it was halted by the U.S. Supreme Court. Imagine what a nationwide recount would look like. Mr. Trump demurred, and said he was fine to leave the current system in place.



Found this tidbit buried in a long WSJ article.

So McConnell talked Trump out of it -- and, interestingly, without trying to explain to him how much the EC favors low-population GOP states.

This little story really shows how oblivious Trump is to political realities. He must be completely unaware that Democrats received millions more votes than Republicans for both House and Senate seats, though they have fewer seats in both.
7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
WSJ: Trump told Congressional leaders he wanted to replace Electoral College w/ nat'l popular vote (Original Post) highplainsdem Jan 2017 OP
Hell, if he'd rather the popular vote decide all, he can do something right away. Tommy_Carcetti Jan 2017 #1
As pointed out in another thread, as if we needed to be told. pangaia Jan 2017 #2
we won the "popular vote" in the senate, but not in the house: unblock Jan 2017 #3
By what authority ? jaysunb Jan 2017 #4
"Bannon, get me an executive order!" dalton99a Jan 2017 #5
I think he also said he supported term limits loyalsister Jan 2017 #6
political realities have changed recently 0rganism Jan 2017 #7

Tommy_Carcetti

(43,184 posts)
1. Hell, if he'd rather the popular vote decide all, he can do something right away.
Fri Jan 27, 2017, 04:58 PM
Jan 2017

Resign, have Mike Pence pick Hillary as VP, and then Pence resigns.

Boom. Problem solved. The popular choice has won.

pangaia

(24,324 posts)
2. As pointed out in another thread, as if we needed to be told.
Fri Jan 27, 2017, 05:11 PM
Jan 2017

the man knows absolutely nothing about anything.. except beating people, and beating them and beating them and beating them...without end....

unblock

(52,256 posts)
3. we won the "popular vote" in the senate, but not in the house:
Fri Jan 27, 2017, 05:37 PM
Jan 2017

Republicans captured the majority of the "popular vote" for the House on Election Day, collecting about 56.3 million votes while Democrats got about 53.2 million, according to USA TODAY calculations. With a few races still undecided, Republicans so far hold a 239-193 majority for the next Congress.

http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/onpolitics/2016/11/10/democrats-won-popular-vote-senate-too/93598998/



i'm guessing that republican congresscritters benefitted more from the incumbent effect as well as more running unopposed or against very lackluster opposition due to being in very safe (gerrymandered) districts.

loyalsister

(13,390 posts)
6. I think he also said he supported term limits
Fri Jan 27, 2017, 05:48 PM
Jan 2017

His supporters apparently fail to understand what it means when a president runs on a campaign to change the constitution then suggests another change after elected. Of course, it's a pretty blatent violation of the oath to uphold the constitution. And, it also represents frightening authoritarian leanings.

0rganism

(23,957 posts)
7. political realities have changed recently
Fri Jan 27, 2017, 05:55 PM
Jan 2017

within a few years, the facts will be exactly what president Trump says they are

the world has changed. we are about to be driven by a different set of "realities" that seem surreal to us because they are incompatible with our original set of "realities". in a few years, these alternative realities will become mainstream.

there will be massive voter purges, disenfranchisements, and deportations on a vast scale to accomplish this. we have never seen such things before, and we will be appropriately outraged as they occur. they are incongruous to our established lifestyles and ways of thinking, but they are the seed framework for the new Russian-dominant world order we are entering.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»WSJ: Trump told Congressi...