Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWe Are Stronger Together
Hillary was right.
It is not identity politics. In fact it is opposite. It is a message of inclusivity.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
6 replies, 791 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (12)
ReplyReply to this post
6 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
We Are Stronger Together (Original Post)
boston bean
Jan 2017
OP
If we all stand shoulder to shoulder under our big tent we will weather the storm, together.
herding cats
Jan 2017
#3
It included everyone except people who didn't want to be stonger together with
boston bean
Jan 2017
#5
Skittles
(153,169 posts)1. ABSOUTELY CORRECT
when assholes say "identity politics", they're implying something like, oh, civil rights for gay folk just aren't THAT important....THIS ISN'T THE TIME! Well guess what, IT'S ALWAYS TIME.....IT'S LONG *PAST* TIME.
brer cat
(24,578 posts)2. So true, boston bean.
Our only hope of getting through this vile administration is by staying together, else the hatred and divisiveness that they are sowing will destroy this nation.
herding cats
(19,565 posts)3. If we all stand shoulder to shoulder under our big tent we will weather the storm, together.
If we let them divide us, we will lose everything we've fought since FDR. All of our hard fought battles for our rights, yours, mine and theirs, will all be reduced to a bittersweet memory.
aikoaiko
(34,172 posts)4. Its really an ancient truism. The problem is the definition of "we"
We can say it included everyone, but that's not what everyone believed. HRC didn't lay the groundwork for a "One America" as Obama did.
The same is true of "Make America Great Again". For many of the people saying that they sincerely meant it for everyone, but significant numbers of POC and women heard a harken for times of more extreme inequality and discrimination. Unfortunately, there were enough people in enough states who found themselves in that message to win 300+ electoral votes.
The meaning of "we" exists in the listener as well as the speaker.
boston bean
(36,221 posts)5. It included everyone except people who didn't want to be stonger together with
women, black persons, muslims, lgbt, hispanic.
aikoaiko
(34,172 posts)6. Sure it did, but the campaign wasn't able to persuade enough
white Americans, to a greater degree, and POC and other minorties, to a lesser degree, that there was value in uniting with Democratic voting women, black persons, muslims, lgbt, hispanics, etc.
There was definitely a sense of get on the bus or get out of the way hubris in the campaign that failed to articulate a "One America" as Candidate and President Obama did.