General Discussion

Cattledog

(5,919 posts) Thu Jan 26, 2017, 06:45 PM Jan 2017

Give tRump a makeover.

He aint gonna like this!

7 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Give tRump a makeover. (Original Post) Cattledog Jan 2017 OP

Well, he would LOOK like a president... Liberal In Texas Jan 2017 #1

Don't forget the Special Effects... LunaSea Jan 2017 #2

And Ivanka will still give him an orange spray tan. Buckeye_Democrat Jan 2017 #5

The third hairdo GallopingGhost Jan 2017 #3

That would be a big improvement madokie Jan 2017 #4

Then he'll need this too. ffr Jan 2017 #6

I'm convinced that he looks so crappy musette_sf Jan 2017 #7

Liberal In Texas

(13,578 posts)

1. Well, he would LOOK like a president...

Reply to Cattledog (Original post)

Thu Jan 26, 2017, 06:51 PM

Jan 2017

but he still wouldn't be acting like one.

LunaSea

(2,895 posts)

2. Don't forget the Special Effects...

Reply to Cattledog (Original post)

Thu Jan 26, 2017, 07:47 PM

Jan 2017

Buckeye_Democrat

(14,858 posts)

5. And Ivanka will still give him an orange spray tan.

Reply to LunaSea (Reply #2)

Thu Jan 26, 2017, 08:04 PM

Jan 2017

http://media.vanityfair.com/photos/57c860850b66fcb2419563e0/master/h_590,c_limit/donald-trump-alison-jackson-ss03.jpg

(I know that's not Ivanka and Donald, but I think it's a funny alternative fact.)

GallopingGhost

(2,404 posts)

3. The third hairdo

Reply to Cattledog (Original post)

Thu Jan 26, 2017, 07:56 PM

Jan 2017

madokie

(51,076 posts)

4. That would be a big improvement

Reply to Cattledog (Original post)

Thu Jan 26, 2017, 08:02 PM

Jan 2017

do something about that anus mouth of his and they'd have a winner LOL

ffr

(22,672 posts)

6. Then he'll need this too.

Reply to Cattledog (Original post)

Thu Jan 26, 2017, 08:24 PM

Jan 2017

musette_sf

(10,206 posts)

7. I'm convinced that he looks so crappy

Reply to Cattledog (Original post)

Thu Jan 26, 2017, 08:24 PM

Jan 2017

in his expensive clothes because he refuses to let anyone touch him to measure him.

Reply to this discussion