General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsTrump Didnt Just Reinstate the Global Gag Rule. He Massively Expanded It.
Trump Didnt Just Reinstate the Global Gag Rule. He Massively Expanded It.
On Monday morning, Donald Trump, surrounded by a group of smiling white men, signed an executive order banning foreign nongovernmental organizations that receive certain kinds of American aid from counseling health clients about abortion or advocating for abortion law liberalization. Supporters of international reproductive rights were disappointed but not surprised. Ronald Reagan first issued the so-called Mexico City policy in 1984, stripping U.S. family planning funds from groups involved with abortion, and ever since, every Republican president has reinstated it. By Mondays end, however, people who work on global reproductive health and rights were reeling. Trump, it eventually emerged, hadnt simply revived the so-called global gag rule. Quietly, with so little publicity that activists werent aware until someone saw the new language in a tweeted image, Trump had massively expanded the rule. Suzanne Ehlers, president and CEO of the global reproductive health organization PAI, says its the global gag rule on steroids.
In the past, the global gag rule meant that foreign NGOs must disavow any involvement with abortion in order to receive U.S. family planning funding. Trumps version of the global gag rule expands the policy to all global health funding. According to Ehlers, the new rule means that rather than impacting $600 million in U.S. foreign aid, the global gag rule will affect $9.5 billion. Organizations working on AIDS, malaria, or maternal and child health will have to make sure that none of their programs involves so much as an abortion referral. Geeta Rao Gupta, a senior fellow at the United Nations Foundation who previously served as deputy executive director of UNICEF, gives the example of HIV/AIDS clinics that get U.S. funding to provide antiretrovirals: If theyre giving advice to women on what to do if theyre pregnant and HIV positive, giving them all the options that exist, they cannot now receive money from the U.S.
George W. Bush specifically exempted the Presidents Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief, or PEPFAR, from the global gag rule because it was widely understood that the program couldnt meet its prevention and treatment targets otherwise. Scott Evertz, who served as director of the White House Office of National AIDS Policy under George W. Bush, tells me, It would have been impossible to treat HIV/AIDS in the developing world as the emergency that PEPFAR said it was if the global gag rule were to be applied to the thousands of organizations with which those of us involved in PEPFAR would be working. Evertz offers the example of a standalone health clinic in the slums of Nairobi, Kenya. Would the U.S. have to certify that it never referred any of its patients to an abortion provider before enlisting it in the fight against AIDS? The notion of applying the global gag rule to them would have made it impossible to implement the program, he says.
Ann Starrs, president of the Guttmacher Institute, says her staff feared social conservatives on the Trump team might push to broaden the global gag rule. Others, however, are stunned at the move. It wasnt unexpected that they would reinstate the global gag rule, but the dramatic expansion of the scope of it is truly shocking, says Gupta. Some in international reproductive and sexual health circles are speculating that the new policy is Trumps way of lashing out at the millions of women who marched against him on Saturday. I would not necessarily be surprised if it were a reaction to the womens marches, Evertz says. Although applying the global gag rule to PEPFARs programs ill affects millions of men as well, since HIV/AIDS programs that treat entire communities could face defunding.
Not to mention the ghastly new gold-finger decor in the Oval Office.
mnhtnbb
(31,404 posts)BTW, those gold drapes were hung during Bill Clinton's presidency.
The best comment I've seen about this scenario is to ask if you could imagine a group of six women smiling at signing an executive
order barring men from getting whatever health services related to their genitals they wished.
Phoenix61
(17,019 posts)We will give you the money but we are going to attach so many strings to it you won't be able to take any of it. If he doesn't care how many American's he kills by repealing ACA why would you think he would care about people in a foreign country? Remember, America first
I never use this word. I think it is a really, really bad mind set but... I HATE those people. I mean, I really, really, hate those people. What piss poor excuses for human beings. They are truly evil.