Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsAs Might be Expected, Trumps infrastructure plan is just a Windfall for Wall Street
In adjusting to the next four years of a Donald Trump presidency, some Democratic lawmakers are looking for places where they might be able to work with him on issues they already care about. One area in which some see such opportunity is infrastructure, given that they have long pushed for the government to spend more on these projects to boost the economy. Trump has promised he wants to do the same.
In fact, Trumps team has already laid out exactly how it would invest in infrastructure, in a paper authored by advisers Wilbur Ross and Peter Navarro. But if Democrats were to read the details, they would quickly see there is little worth endorsing.
In short, rather than have the government raise or borrow money at incredibly low interest rates and then grant the money to state and local governments to build or maintain infrastructure, Trumps plan would give private investors tax credits for construction projects. Those private firms would then raise the rest of the money needed for those projects, recouping the costs in profits.
Such projects would address very few of the countrys most dire infrastructure needs, end up costing some Americans a lot more money, and generate little to no economic boost. However, the plan would be a major windfall for private companies looking to boost their bottom lines.
In fact, Trumps team has already laid out exactly how it would invest in infrastructure, in a paper authored by advisers Wilbur Ross and Peter Navarro. But if Democrats were to read the details, they would quickly see there is little worth endorsing.
In short, rather than have the government raise or borrow money at incredibly low interest rates and then grant the money to state and local governments to build or maintain infrastructure, Trumps plan would give private investors tax credits for construction projects. Those private firms would then raise the rest of the money needed for those projects, recouping the costs in profits.
Such projects would address very few of the countrys most dire infrastructure needs, end up costing some Americans a lot more money, and generate little to no economic boost. However, the plan would be a major windfall for private companies looking to boost their bottom lines.
https://thinkprogress.org/trump-infrastructure-plan-3cd425323c76#.o21wcyi0l
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
8 replies, 1067 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (9)
ReplyReply to this post
8 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
As Might be Expected, Trumps infrastructure plan is just a Windfall for Wall Street (Original Post)
CousinIT
Jan 2017
OP
emulatorloo
(44,176 posts)1. We're not going to be able to walk down the street w/o paying a toll n/t
SamKnause
(13,110 posts)2. Everything he does will be a big windfall for Wall Street.
Cutting taxes is a big windfall for Wall Street.
Deregulation is a big windfall for Wall Street.
jmg257
(11,996 posts)3. Ah - that plan jives with statements from trump's union rep meeting...
At a meeting with the leaders of several construction and building trade unions, President Trump reiterated on Monday his interest in directing hundreds of billions of dollars to infrastructure investments, some of it from the federal government, union officials said.
...
That the American citizenry and the American Treasury will be invested in building public infrastructure.
Mr. McGarvey added that Mr. Trump clearly felt that much of the money should come from the private sector and that some of the investments could take the form of public-private partnerships, an idea the president floated as a candidate.
...
That the American citizenry and the American Treasury will be invested in building public infrastructure.
Mr. McGarvey added that Mr. Trump clearly felt that much of the money should come from the private sector and that some of the investments could take the form of public-private partnerships, an idea the president floated as a candidate.
Turbineguy
(37,364 posts)4. Look at it this way:
If they are busy stealing that, perhaps they'll leave our pensions alone. At least for a while anyway.
world wide wally
(21,754 posts)5. We'll spend half of our travel time waiting in line to pay tolls
Longer commutes (time wise)
More expensive
More pollution
More road rage
What can go wrong?
Wounded Bear
(58,703 posts)8. I think you've nailed it....nt
kairos12
(12,870 posts)6. Should name the Project Tolls by Trolls.
Ron Green
(9,823 posts)7. Don't buy ANY infrastructure project that adds traffic lanes.
The best place for the trillion dollars is directly to mayors.