Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

nini

(16,672 posts)
Sat Jan 21, 2017, 12:26 AM Jan 2017

If you claim to be a feminist and you exclude the female candidate for president

you are a hypocrite. Pure and simple.

This isn't a Hillary appreciation rally though it was inspired by her candidacy. You don't have to like her to accept that.

The fact this is even something to fight over makes me ill. If you can't find the common ground with those who don't agree with you on every single issue - you're not off to a good start.

On edit.. ok, She wasn't the 'first' but is the first of a major party and was just last year.. Not to mention she wont the popular vote like she did.

63 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
If you claim to be a feminist and you exclude the female candidate for president (Original Post) nini Jan 2017 OP
Are you saying that in order to be a feminist, you must support every woman in everything? uppityperson Jan 2017 #1
Of courser not....that's not what I said nini Jan 2017 #5
Cha explained downthread. I didn't know what this was about and excluding her is very wrong uppityperson Jan 2017 #17
Some would argue that Sara Palin was an accomplished woman who "paved the way" for tea party women loyalsister Jan 2017 #8
Nobody is asking for their name to be added to an honorary list. joshcryer Jan 2017 #14
I don't care if it is or not loyalsister Jan 2017 #18
All reasons are irrelevant as soon as people say they are upset about it. joshcryer Jan 2017 #20
People don't even know if whe wanted to be included loyalsister Jan 2017 #21
It doesn't matter. It's trivial. joshcryer Jan 2017 #34
Maybe it's not a trivial thing to those who made the list Merlot Jan 2017 #29
There's no logical or rational reason to not throw her on the list. joshcryer Jan 2017 #35
Maybe there is no logical reason to put her on the list. Merlot Jan 2017 #45
No, obviously. But anyone who claimed to be a feminist and didn't vote for pnwmom Jan 2017 #60
Victoria Woodhull? Warpy Jan 2017 #2
This message was self-deleted by its author uppityperson Jan 2017 #4
Of a major party nini Jan 2017 #6
Hillary is the first Female Candidate for President of a major Party. Cha Jan 2017 #9
Yes, we know. Every one knows. Merlot Jan 2017 #30
I was talking to Warpy who didn't get the distinction, obviously. Cha Jan 2017 #33
People so upset for it being memtioned. boston bean Jan 2017 #38
I've noticed.. like how dare we want Hillary's name listed Cha Jan 2017 #40
P.S. Cha Jan 2017 #41
Does she want to be included in this protest? Barack_America Jan 2017 #3
Does that matter? nini Jan 2017 #10
Hillary Clinton's Name Was Omitted From the Women's March Honoree List and People Are Angry Cha Jan 2017 #7
I prefer to support women who have worked to improve things for us nini Jan 2017 #12
Exactly, nini! Let's Honor Hillary and all the others like Susan B Cha Jan 2017 #23
Thank you for explaining what this is about. That is very wrong. uppityperson Jan 2017 #15
You're Welcome, uppity Cha Jan 2017 #24
Watch out luv, my post was deleted for the very same sentiments. arthritisR_US Jan 2017 #16
I'm sorry that happened to you, arthritisR.. Cha Jan 2017 #25
The list should be huge. LisaM Jan 2017 #27
Exactly, LisaM.. Mahlao! "puny list" indeed. Don't be a Cha Jan 2017 #32
You missed the point entirely. arthritisR_US Jan 2017 #44
Thank you! I said the same and my post was deleted, so much for arthritisR_US Jan 2017 #11
well.. maybe this will be too nini Jan 2017 #13
I hope not, pointing out hypocrisy should be valued. arthritisR_US Jan 2017 #19
A lot of people are exceptionally angry and some are expressing it in really stupid ways Maru Kitteh Jan 2017 #22
good god would you people give it UP ALREADY! chillfactor Jan 2017 #26
I'd like DU's self-appointed Thought Police to give it up already. emulatorloo Jan 2017 #28
+1 Starry Messenger Jan 2017 #31
This is what happens when all it takes is to set up a webpage to run a "movement." joshcryer Jan 2017 #36
excellent assessment Skittles Jan 2017 #39
"My big beef is they use a famous HRC quote as their guiding principle but don't say she said it... Cha Jan 2017 #43
Ignore is your friend nini Jan 2017 #37
"you people"? Not one of us have said or intimated "it's all about Hillary" Cha Jan 2017 #42
I can't tell you how much I love that picture of Michelle nini Jan 2017 #49
Here's another precious one.. Cha Jan 2017 #50
I hadn't seen that one nini Jan 2017 #53
I hadn't seen that one either! betsuni Jan 2017 #56
I dunno if she'd even want to.. but she could just Cha Jan 2017 #57
They better like rain because we're getting slammed here nini Jan 2017 #61
Good for you getting Rain now! Cha Jan 2017 #62
She was mentioned by many of the speakers in DC justiceischeap Jan 2017 #46
good to hear nini Jan 2017 #48
I think having a "list" was a really dumb idea. Too many deserving women get left off. jalan48 Jan 2017 #47
Not a hypocrite Lotusflower70 Jan 2017 #51
I didn't say it was ALL about Hillary nini Jan 2017 #55
I understand that Lotusflower70 Jan 2017 #58
Hypothetically Lithos Jan 2017 #52
Of course women should not get special treatment the way you describe nini Jan 2017 #54
I didn't even like Hillary as a candidate but... LittleBlue Jan 2017 #59
it would have turned the march into a sore losers' march. n/t Hamlette Jan 2017 #63

uppityperson

(115,681 posts)
1. Are you saying that in order to be a feminist, you must support every woman in everything?
Sat Jan 21, 2017, 12:32 AM
Jan 2017

That is what is seems like, I'd like clarification please. Thank you.

nini

(16,672 posts)
5. Of courser not....that's not what I said
Sat Jan 21, 2017, 12:44 AM
Jan 2017

I am saying you're not going to agree with everyone on everything. I don't but that doesn't mean I exclude those I agree with on most things though there may be some I don't.

The fact is this whole rally idea was created because women were motivated by her female candidacy and to not even list her as someone who motivates women. Feminists are supposed to support woman achievements, strength etc.. I don't see this happening.

loyalsister

(13,390 posts)
8. Some would argue that Sara Palin was an accomplished woman who "paved the way" for tea party women
Sat Jan 21, 2017, 12:47 AM
Jan 2017

A republican suggested that we should celebrate Kellyanne Conway because she is the first woman to run a successful campaign.
Then we would go down the road of celebrating every single woman who has been successful in politics.
The list of honorees includes many obscure women who worked in the trenches.

joshcryer

(62,277 posts)
14. Nobody is asking for their name to be added to an honorary list.
Sat Jan 21, 2017, 12:51 AM
Jan 2017

Now please tell me how painful it would be to throw Clinton's name on there. Give me an exhaustive list of reasons why it shouldn't be done even though people are upset about it.

God. Such a trivial thing. Fighting over something so simple.

loyalsister

(13,390 posts)
18. I don't care if it is or not
Sat Jan 21, 2017, 12:55 AM
Jan 2017

I'm just saying there might be good reasons for her not to be listed among honorees.

joshcryer

(62,277 posts)
20. All reasons are irrelevant as soon as people say they are upset about it.
Sat Jan 21, 2017, 12:57 AM
Jan 2017

Whether or not you agree with them being upset about it.

loyalsister

(13,390 posts)
21. People don't even know if whe wanted to be included
Sat Jan 21, 2017, 01:07 AM
Jan 2017

I just don't understand why it's so impossible to believe that there may be good reasons that she isn't listed.

joshcryer

(62,277 posts)
34. It doesn't matter. It's trivial.
Sat Jan 21, 2017, 03:11 AM
Jan 2017

Add to the list. Go "oh shit, we didn't want to assume anything, sorry, you're right, we were insensitive."

Nope. Ain't happening. All this justification. All this bullshit outrage culture garbage.

Merlot

(9,696 posts)
29. Maybe it's not a trivial thing to those who made the list
Sat Jan 21, 2017, 02:12 AM
Jan 2017

It seems simple to demand that someone else change their criteria for whose on their list.


joshcryer

(62,277 posts)
35. There's no logical or rational reason to not throw her on the list.
Sat Jan 21, 2017, 03:12 AM
Jan 2017

When people say they're upset about her not being on it.

Really. There's no logical, rational, human reason that you can make that makes sense, is compassionate, is logical and reasoned. None. People already tried to make the argument that "losers" shouldn't be on the list. Really. It's pathetic. That's why we lose

If it's nontrivial to simply add the popular vote winner to the list, whose supporters are hurt she's not on it, then those people have serious issues.

Merlot

(9,696 posts)
45. Maybe there is no logical reason to put her on the list.
Sat Jan 21, 2017, 08:23 PM
Jan 2017

It was their list, they had their reasons.

Some of us are suffering from Hillary fatigue.

pnwmom

(109,001 posts)
60. No, obviously. But anyone who claimed to be a feminist and didn't vote for
Sun Jan 22, 2017, 10:00 PM
Jan 2017

Hillary, the only progressive and feminist who had a chance to beat the Pig, is a hypocrite or worse.

Response to Warpy (Reply #2)

nini

(16,672 posts)
6. Of a major party
Sat Jan 21, 2017, 12:45 AM
Jan 2017

but yes, that is correct. And I fixed it.

Is she on the list? she should be.

Merlot

(9,696 posts)
30. Yes, we know. Every one knows.
Sat Jan 21, 2017, 02:14 AM
Jan 2017

We were reminded about it constantly during the campaign.

Some of us would have preferred to not focus on it so much. Maybe making it into such a big deal proves how far we haven't come.

Cha

(297,797 posts)
40. I've noticed.. like how dare we want Hillary's name listed
Sat Jan 21, 2017, 04:43 AM
Jan 2017

on the Honorees of Women paving the way for Women's Rights.

Cha

(297,797 posts)
7. Hillary Clinton's Name Was Omitted From the Women's March Honoree List and People Are Angry
Sat Jan 21, 2017, 12:46 AM
Jan 2017

snip//

On Thursday, January 19, the movement released a document about its guiding vision and definition of principles, which included the names of 27 women who have "paved the way" for equal rights. Clinton, who was the first-ever female presidential nominee for a major political party, was not among them — and people took notice.

snip//

A petition on Change.org was created in light of the omission. "As activists and allies, we are dismayed that March organizers excluded Hillary Rodham Clinton as an honoree who has inspired women around the world to serve and to lead," the request reads.

http://www.usmagazine.com/celebrity-news/news/hillary-clintons-name-left-off-womens-march-honoree-list-w462125

They're trying to marginalize Hillary because we're angry she was left off the Honorees list. By any means it wasn't a complete list.. they left off Susan B Anthony for one other important Woman.. they need to go back to the drawing board.

If they can't find the common decency to add Hillary's name to the list then they have a big bitter problem.

Thanks nini

nini

(16,672 posts)
12. I prefer to support women who have worked to improve things for us
Sat Jan 21, 2017, 12:51 AM
Jan 2017

Not shut the door on 'em.

We have so many wonderful women to honor and should. Leaving off the most recent candidate for the party we're all supposed to be supporting here is ridiculous.

uppityperson

(115,681 posts)
15. Thank you for explaining what this is about. That is very wrong.
Sat Jan 21, 2017, 12:53 AM
Jan 2017

I've been offline most of today, trying to catch up a bit

LisaM

(27,843 posts)
27. The list should be huge.
Sat Jan 21, 2017, 01:39 AM
Jan 2017

Limiting it to 27 women was ridiculous on its face. And no, Kellyanne Conway and Sarah Palin who didn't support progressive issues at all should not be included. Geeze, I would include Abigail Adams and Rosa Parks and Sacagawea and Kay Boyle and Florence Nightingale and Jane Addams and Geraldine Ferraro. Why did they even make such a puny list?

Maru Kitteh

(28,343 posts)
22. A lot of people are exceptionally angry and some are expressing it in really stupid ways
Sat Jan 21, 2017, 01:16 AM
Jan 2017

History will not concern itself with whatever petty little squabbles have erupted these last couple of days.

It will feature Hillary, her history of feminism, and the amazing march on Washington as a re-awakening of women in this century.



chillfactor

(7,584 posts)
26. good god would you people give it UP ALREADY!
Sat Jan 21, 2017, 01:32 AM
Jan 2017

I have always supported Hillary...but you people are really getting on my nerves and on may other people's nerves as well. This march is NOT about Hillary. It is about protecting the rights of ALL people...not just women.

emulatorloo

(44,205 posts)
28. I'd like DU's self-appointed Thought Police to give it up already.
Sat Jan 21, 2017, 02:09 AM
Jan 2017

There are legit reasons to be annoyed at that butthurt organizer who is still bitter over primary 2016.

My big beef is they use a famous HRC quote as their guiding principle but don't say she said it. They don't credit the quote.

Seriously, wtf?

At best it is plagiarism, at worst it is a petty way to erase her service. trump-style.

Apparently that butthurt woman needs to take one last shit on HRC.

So yeah, people are pissed and are gonna call her out.

That being said, Everybody's gonna go to the march and stand together against Trump. That woman's bullshit won't stop anybody, this event is too big.

joshcryer

(62,277 posts)
36. This is what happens when all it takes is to set up a webpage to run a "movement."
Sat Jan 21, 2017, 03:50 AM
Jan 2017

It goes viral, suddenly you are the spokesperson for an entire movement. And instead of being considerate, kind, and open, you just say fuck you to any criticism. It's cronyism to the core.

The women leaving comments on the WomensMarchOnWash page are extremely kind, considerate, and overall non-hostile in their request to include Clinton on the list of honorees.

But people still reply with hateful attitudes.

I think that by and large the event is going to be big, but I fear that there will be enough incidents of clashes between people who support Hillary too loudly and people who want it to just "be about women" that it will become the news as opposed to the size and solidarity of the march.

We'll see what happens. I hope I'm wrong and the shit stirrers don't actually get media coverage.

Cha

(297,797 posts)
43. "My big beef is they use a famous HRC quote as their guiding principle but don't say she said it...
Sat Jan 21, 2017, 05:11 AM
Jan 2017
They don't credit the quote."

Wow.. that's some weird shite.. one should always credit a quote unless it's anonymous.

"That being said, Everybody's gonna go to the march and stand together against Trump. That woman's bullshit won't stop anybody, this event is too big."

That's right.. she hoisted herself. Everyone will move on and March with Kindred Spirits.



Mahalo emulatorloo~



Cha

(297,797 posts)
42. "you people"? Not one of us have said or intimated "it's all about Hillary"
Sat Jan 21, 2017, 04:56 AM
Jan 2017

you're projecting.

We do think her name should be on the Honoree list for Women paving the way for Women's Rights.

I really don't care that we're getting on your nerves.. we have a right to discuss this and you have an option to trash these OPs/posts instead of jumping on and telling us what to do.

Hillary's name missing from the Honoree's is a glaring omission along with Michelle Obama's and a lot of other Women who have paved the way.

The list as someone said "was puny".. they need to go back to the drawing board.

Hillary Clinton's Name Was Omitted From the Women's March Honoree List and People Are Angry

snip//

On Thursday, January 19, the movement released a document about its guiding vision and definition of principles, which included the names of 27 women who have "paved the way" for equal rights. Clinton, who was the first-ever female presidential nominee for a major political party, was not among them — and people took notice.

snip//

A petition on Change.org was created in light of the omission. "As activists and allies, we are dismayed that March organizers excluded Hillary Rodham Clinton as an honoree who has inspired women around the world to serve and to lead," the request reads.

http://www.usmagazine.com/celebrity-news/news/hillary-clintons-name-left-off-womens-march-honoree-list-w462125

Cha

(297,797 posts)
50. Here's another precious one..
Sat Jan 21, 2017, 11:39 PM
Jan 2017

Nerdy Wonka ?@NerdyWonka
First Lady Michelle Obama is all of us. She is not going to pretend she's here for this racist mess.

G.O.A.T.

10:34 AM - 20 Jan 2017

https://twitter.com/NerdyWonka?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw

betsuni

(25,686 posts)
56. I hadn't seen that one either!
Sun Jan 22, 2017, 03:40 AM
Jan 2017

This is why she can't be a politician, and neither could I. Can't pretend.

Cha

(297,797 posts)
57. I dunno if she'd even want to.. but she could just
Sun Jan 22, 2017, 03:51 AM
Jan 2017

give them stink eye and side eye and wouldn't have to say a word.

I love the Obamas and am so happy they're on a vacation in Rancho Mirage! But, they'll be back in some strong capacity.. they're not going to leave us to the vampires.

Cha

(297,797 posts)
62. Good for you getting Rain now!
Mon Jan 23, 2017, 01:45 AM
Jan 2017

President Obama will just have to do something else besides Golf.

nini

(16,672 posts)
48. good to hear
Sat Jan 21, 2017, 11:21 PM
Jan 2017

I'm sure it wasn't the attendees at all.

I'm so happy about what I'm seeing from around the world - I feel better than I have since the election!

jalan48

(13,901 posts)
47. I think having a "list" was a really dumb idea. Too many deserving women get left off.
Sat Jan 21, 2017, 08:29 PM
Jan 2017

That being said, Clinton just completed an historic run for President. She should have been recognized for it.

Lotusflower70

(3,077 posts)
51. Not a hypocrite
Sat Jan 21, 2017, 11:43 PM
Jan 2017

She helped pave the way to move forward. But that's just it, it's time to move forward. She is doing fine with her life. We need to keep the momentum and build on it. I am a feminist. This moment was about so much more than Hillary.

nini

(16,672 posts)
55. I didn't say it was ALL about Hillary
Sun Jan 22, 2017, 02:56 AM
Jan 2017

None of the women listed should have been mentioned then since they were old school.

You can't forget the past to move forward.

Lotusflower70

(3,077 posts)
58. I understand that
Sun Jan 22, 2017, 09:29 PM
Jan 2017

You can't mention everyone either. I think it was smart not to focus on her actually. The movement doesn't need to give the Republicans any ammo. Lots of people at the marches had cardboard cutouts of her. From what I saw, people acknowledged her in their own ways. Some people wore the I'm with her shirts.

Lithos

(26,404 posts)
52. Hypothetically
Sat Jan 21, 2017, 11:53 PM
Jan 2017

At the simplest form, if I'm a Feminist, then I will judge a woman the same as a man. If one particular woman lacks the qualifications then I should not endorse/vote for her if the man has greater qualifications (obviously having a penis does not count).

The hard part about being a Feminist is knowing when you have crossed into some old convention which puts a woman at a disadvantage because of gender.

(For the record, I voted for Hillary as obviously she was the most qualified person).

L-

nini

(16,672 posts)
54. Of course women should not get special treatment the way you describe
Sun Jan 22, 2017, 02:55 AM
Jan 2017

I agree.


But you cannot ignore what Hillary has done for women in this country - especially being our candidate. She earned a mention.

 

LittleBlue

(10,362 posts)
59. I didn't even like Hillary as a candidate but...
Sun Jan 22, 2017, 09:31 PM
Jan 2017

there is zero doubt that she represents tens of millions of women and girls who supported her. Excluding her was a major blunder, and I'm a Bernie bro.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»If you claim to be a femi...