Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

TomCADem

(17,390 posts)
Mon Jan 16, 2017, 09:46 PM Jan 2017

WH Ethics Counsel - Just when you thought the Trump ethics disaster couldnt get worse, it did

Too bad the media is caught up in Trump's latest tweet storm. They are missing how Trump is about to be in breach of his constitutional obligations from Day One. Put another way, Republicans were losing their mind with respect to whether Hillary Clinton would have any connection to a non-profit foundation. Trump is going to continue owning and profiting from his various businesses. Indeed, foreign governments have already made it a point to make sure to stay at Trump branded properties in order to curry favor with Donald Trump.

Here is a nice article written by two former White House Ethics lawyers.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/just-when-you-thought-the-trump-ethics-disaster-couldnt-get-worse-it-did/2017/01/16/001db550-dc04-11e6-ad42-f3375f271c9c_story.html?hpid=hp_no-name_opinion-card-f%3Ahomepage%2Fstory&utm_term=.bf1e09b538ed

How does the Trump plan fall short? The president-elect asserted that the conflicts laws don’t apply to him but ignored the most fundamental one of all: the constitutional rule that presidents may not accept cash and other benefits — “emoluments” — from foreign governments.

Trump’s lawyer then offered a porous and insufficient plan to address this problem: The Trump Organization will donate profits from foreign governments’ use of his hotels. But why only hotels? What about foreign sovereign payments to buy his condos or apartments, for use of his office buildings or his golf courses, not to mention his massive foreign government bank loans, and other benefits? And why only profits, when the Justice Department has long held that the emoluments clause covers any revenue from foreign governments — not simply profits?

For speaking up about the shortcomings of this plan, Shaub found himself in the Republican crosshairs. Rep. Jason Chaffetz (Utah), chair of the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee that has jurisdiction over the White House, demanded Shaub appear for a Star Chamber-style recorded inquisition and implicitly threatened to shut down the Office of Government Ethics if Shaub did not submit. Chaffetz ought to have been doing the exact opposite, supporting OGE and demanding documents from Trump about any financial ties to Russia or other foreign governments.

Then, just when we thought it couldn’t get worse, it did. The incoming White House chief of staff, Reince Priebus, went on national television to threaten Shaub. In a scene like something out of a gangster B-movie, Priebus warned the director that “he ought to be careful ” and gave his blessing to Chaffetz’s interrogation. Priebus’s glare of menace was unmistakable. The only thing he left out was cracking his knuckles.
7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
WH Ethics Counsel - Just when you thought the Trump ethics disaster couldnt get worse, it did (Original Post) TomCADem Jan 2017 OP
"Profits" central scrutinizer Jan 2017 #1
Was going to say same- both Hollywood and Port Authority bettyellen Jan 2017 #2
Only Congress can do anything about it; gives the GOP quite a hold over him. Crash2Parties Jan 2017 #3
Its a Mutual Free Pass TomCADem Jan 2017 #4
What could possibly go wrong for the rest of us, right? Crash2Parties Jan 2017 #5
"Priebuss glare of menace was unmistakable." dhill926 Jan 2017 #6
Crib Seep Urine the_sly_pig Jan 2017 #7
 

bettyellen

(47,209 posts)
2. Was going to say same- both Hollywood and Port Authority
Mon Jan 16, 2017, 10:40 PM
Jan 2017

(The agency that runs tunnels and trains between NY and NJ as well as our airports) are both infamous for using this "profits" scheme to not pay partners. We almost let them build on a pier here and they promised "payments in lieu of taxes" based on profits. When we looked into it, we saw they screw over everyone!

Crash2Parties

(6,017 posts)
3. Only Congress can do anything about it; gives the GOP quite a hold over him.
Tue Jan 17, 2017, 12:06 AM
Jan 2017

So it's going to be just like a Pence presidency, but with Trump being allowed to make as many deals as he wants to enrich his own fortunes. Not that Pence wouldn't, he just won't have the same opportunities. And besides, beyond what he can make here his reward is in heaven after "saving" all those women who might want to make decisions for their own bodies. Oh, and gay folk...

TomCADem

(17,390 posts)
4. Its a Mutual Free Pass
Tue Jan 17, 2017, 12:09 AM
Jan 2017

President Trump will look the other way when it comes to voter suppression and appointing right wing, conservative judges. In return, Congress looks the other way as Trump profits off the Presidency.

dhill926

(16,351 posts)
6. "Priebuss glare of menace was unmistakable."
Tue Jan 17, 2017, 12:15 AM
Jan 2017

jesus christ. should laugh the sniveling little fuckstick out of the room...

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»WH Ethics Counsel - Just ...