Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

femmocrat

(28,394 posts)
Fri Jun 22, 2012, 10:12 PM Jun 2012

Sandusky Guilty on 45 of 48 counts.

Last edited Fri Jun 22, 2012, 11:18 PM - Edit history (2)

He will never see the light of day again in his lifetime. He was taken directly to jail. Amendola said he wasn't a flight risk, but that didn't fly. He is in the police cruiser as I am typing this. On his way to Centre Co. jail.

Formal sentencing in about 90 days.

NBC is reporting that he faces a min. of 60 yrs. in jail.

Sandusky's attorney, Amendola complaining that he didn't have enough time to prepare the defense and plans to appeal. Praised the judge for his fairness.
Saying that Sandusky didn't testify because the prosecution would have used his son Matt as rebuttal witness. Crowd is heckling Amendola for implying that Sandusky could still be innocent (?). Appeal would be based on continuance order, inability to call witnesses, and rush to trial. Crowd is cheering that Sandusky received in effect a life sentence.

PA Atty General Linda Kelly addressing the crowd now. (10:48 p.m.) Cheering from crowd for her team and for the brave victims. She gave a long speech and took a couple of questions but didn't give very detailed answers. Someone was heckling her during her speech. It could have been about why it took so long to prosecute, because she said that was a subject "for another day". She said the other trial(s) haven't been scheduled yet and then walked back into the courthouse.

Pittsburgh local news reports that none of the jurors will be addressing the media (at least tonight).

39 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Sandusky Guilty on 45 of 48 counts. (Original Post) femmocrat Jun 2012 OP
Good. n/t cynatnite Jun 2012 #1
Rot in Hell, Jerry Sandusky!! RandySF Jun 2012 #2
Fantastic news! Throw the key away on this POS. teddy51 Jun 2012 #3
YES! aquart Jun 2012 #4
Good. Arkansas Granny Jun 2012 #5
Yup. So glad. nt riderinthestorm Jun 2012 #6
Wth did they find him innocent on? Kalidurga Jun 2012 #7
I'm waiting to hear that, too. Listening to local news in Pittsburgh. femmocrat Jun 2012 #8
Juries do not find anyone "innocent" of anything ... markpkessinger Jun 2012 #19
It might have been the janitor's statement on what he saw Samantha Jun 2012 #34
Seen on twitter: ProfessionalLeftist Jun 2012 #9
Certainly makes one wonder why they aren't on trial with this POS. teddy51 Jun 2012 #10
They ought to have been, along with his complicit wife. n/t ProfessionalLeftist Jun 2012 #12
There is an on-going grand jury inquiry, acc. to MSNBC. femmocrat Jun 2012 #15
Ouch. (nt) Posteritatis Jun 2012 #13
DING DING DING! ProfessionalLeftist, you're our grand prize winner! rocktivity Jun 2012 #17
One item at a time, please. Those PSU higher-ups will be getting theirs DinahMoeHum Jun 2012 #18
His victims... MrScorpio Jun 2012 #11
+1 nt TBF Jun 2012 #26
Wow! Really! Thank God Number23 Jun 2012 #14
2 guilty verdicts sandyshoes17 Jun 2012 #16
I tust this will put to rest some of the scurrilous speculation about the jury's ability ... markpkessinger Jun 2012 #20
So glad that the jury didn't buy any of that sleazebag Amendola's beac Jun 2012 #21
Justice has been done. CaliforniaPeggy Jun 2012 #22
Too bad Tom Corbett can't be indicted for covering up the case when he was Attorney General. blue neen Jun 2012 #23
Are those reporters yelling and interrupting sufrommich Jun 2012 #24
AMF taught_me_patience Jun 2012 #25
Won't happen liberaltrucker Jun 2012 #29
Bless the victims for having the courage to testify. blue neen Jun 2012 #27
Sadly, it should probably be 480 out of 500 Zanzoobar Jun 2012 #28
Don't want to see him whacked in the big house. wake.up.america Jun 2012 #38
OK .. Now go for those who covered for him. DemoTex Jun 2012 #30
Exactly- they should all rot in hell n/t curlyred Jun 2012 #31
Exactly. His wife should get prosecuted. nm rhett o rick Jun 2012 #32
Irrelevant to this thread liberaltrucker Jun 2012 #33
Good. emilyg Jun 2012 #35
Justice is served. 99Forever Jun 2012 #36
What about those who knew and did nothing... wake.up.america Jun 2012 #37
I can picture Sandusky being placed on suicide watch wake.up.america Jun 2012 #39

Kalidurga

(14,177 posts)
7. Wth did they find him innocent on?
Fri Jun 22, 2012, 10:16 PM
Jun 2012

I guess it doesn't matter, he will be in jail the rest of his life. I wish his wife was serving as well.

markpkessinger

(8,401 posts)
19. Juries do not find anyone "innocent" of anything ...
Fri Jun 22, 2012, 10:43 PM
Jun 2012

... The merely pronounce a verdict on whether or not they believe guilt on the charges before them to have been proved beyond a reasonable doubt. In this case, they found that on 45 of the 48 counts, guilt was so proved; and on 3 of those counts, guilt was not proved beyond a reasonable doubt. That doesn't mean they have pronounced him "innocent" on those charges, but merely that the case for guilt was not sufficient for a finding of "guilty." That's an important distinction.

Samantha

(9,314 posts)
34. It might have been the janitor's statement on what he saw
Sat Jun 23, 2012, 12:09 AM
Jun 2012

They sent out a question during deliberations regarding the evidence a janitor had previously supplied on certain charges before he became senile. The jury's question regarded legally how much weight evidence given toward those counts could be still be allowed since the janitor today was not "available" to repeat his eye-witness testimony. They might have decided it was better to not take any risks with their verdict; if there was a question on a couple of charges, it would be better to find only guilty on those charges that were unquestionably proven in this trial, because to include guilty charges on those counts with a question-mark on the evidence hanging over them would give further grounds for an appeal. Just a guess.

femmocrat

(28,394 posts)
15. There is an on-going grand jury inquiry, acc. to MSNBC.
Fri Jun 22, 2012, 10:30 PM
Jun 2012

The two administrators, Curley and Schultz, who were fired when the allegations came out, are supposed to be tried as well.

rocktivity

(44,577 posts)
17. DING DING DING! ProfessionalLeftist, you're our grand prize winner!
Fri Jun 22, 2012, 10:32 PM
Jun 2012
"It took a jury 21 hours to do what Penn State couldn't manage to do in nine years."

And WHY couldn't they manage it? Because the welfare of a child didn't matter to Penn State as much as their heritage and image and donations and income streams.

Sandusky literally had an empire going: an endless supply of disadvantaged victims less likely to be believed, parents who could be dismissed as money-grubbing, upper management and local law enforcement looking the other way, and most valuable of all, colleagues who were willing to keep quiet...


rocktivity

DinahMoeHum

(21,801 posts)
18. One item at a time, please. Those PSU higher-ups will be getting theirs
Fri Jun 22, 2012, 10:33 PM
Jun 2012

sooner rather than later.

If not in criminal court, then in civil court. They'll most likely be sued for everything they have.

Just sayin'

Number23

(24,544 posts)
14. Wow! Really! Thank God
Fri Jun 22, 2012, 10:28 PM
Jun 2012

Wonder what will happen to his wife? And the other people who actually went on the stand in DEFENSE of this man.

sandyshoes17

(657 posts)
16. 2 guilty verdicts
Fri Jun 22, 2012, 10:31 PM
Jun 2012

Didn't someone in the catholic church get convicted yesterday. Finally these bastards are paying for what they got away for years. The party's over boys.

markpkessinger

(8,401 posts)
20. I tust this will put to rest some of the scurrilous speculation about the jury's ability ...
Fri Jun 22, 2012, 10:44 PM
Jun 2012

... to render a fair verdict.

beac

(9,992 posts)
21. So glad that the jury didn't buy any of that sleazebag Amendola's
Fri Jun 22, 2012, 10:46 PM
Jun 2012

attempts to smear and blame the victims.

Now I hope the victims sue Dottie into the poorhouse. She KNEW!

blue neen

(12,327 posts)
23. Too bad Tom Corbett can't be indicted for covering up the case when he was Attorney General.
Fri Jun 22, 2012, 10:54 PM
Jun 2012

He was another enabler of this pedophile.

I'm so glad that the jury did its' job!

blue neen

(12,327 posts)
27. Bless the victims for having the courage to testify.
Fri Jun 22, 2012, 11:18 PM
Jun 2012

It had to be so very difficult for them. They helped to put a monster away, Thank God.

 

Zanzoobar

(894 posts)
28. Sadly, it should probably be 480 out of 500
Fri Jun 22, 2012, 11:29 PM
Jun 2012

Most of his victims are probably unknown and will remain unknown.

I hope he is killed quickly in prison. I don't want him to suffer. I want him out of my universe.

wake.up.america

(3,334 posts)
38. Don't want to see him whacked in the big house.
Sat Jun 23, 2012, 01:20 AM
Jun 2012

I think he will live in relative isolation for the rest of his life.

DemoTex

(25,400 posts)
30. OK .. Now go for those who covered for him.
Fri Jun 22, 2012, 11:32 PM
Jun 2012

This is the most egregious offense an adult in a position of responsibility (in an athletic program .. or anything) can perpetrate. BUT, there is so much lesser shit going on in college athletics that needs to be investigated (hey, hey ... Auburn, check six!). What a crime-ridden racket.

liberaltrucker

(9,129 posts)
33. Irrelevant to this thread
Fri Jun 22, 2012, 11:52 PM
Jun 2012

Alleged payola to athletes or their family members is NOTHING compared to this monster.

If Auburn, et al, violated NCAA rules, the NCAA will eventually deal with it. Just ask USC.

99Forever

(14,524 posts)
36. Justice is served.
Sat Jun 23, 2012, 12:18 AM
Jun 2012

May the time he serves be enough for some small comfort to the people he has victimized.

wake.up.america

(3,334 posts)
37. What about those who knew and did nothing...
Sat Jun 23, 2012, 01:15 AM
Jun 2012

Especially his wife.

Isn't there a legal obligation to report such repulsive behavior? If there is no such law, I suggest legislators work on it. In such a case, it must have been obvious that some sort of inappropriate behavior was going on.

wake.up.america

(3,334 posts)
39. I can picture Sandusky being placed on suicide watch
Sat Jun 23, 2012, 01:29 AM
Jun 2012

He looks to be in a terrible state. Not that I have much sympathy for him.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Sandusky Guilty on 45 of ...