General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThe best thing that could happen to Citizen's United is
Have multi-billionaires like Adelson + the Kochs & groups like KKKarl's pour in their billions to Mitt's campaign and then
have him lose. Big.
Billions and billions of dollars thrown in the trash just might make John Roberts wake up & scratch his perfectly coiffed hair.
And when President Obama wins re-election, I can't wait to say...
"How's that buying a President thingy workin' out for ya?"
Nye Bevan
(25,406 posts)former9thward
(32,039 posts)Not only are some corporations contributing to Obama but CU freed labor unions to make unlimited contributions. It is a two way street.
SoutherDem
(2,307 posts)Should he refuse to use a super pac and be out spent more than he already will be?
former9thward
(32,039 posts)He out spent McCain by almost 2 to 1 and every dollar of that was needed. I am not one of those who wails about money in politics. I am in favor of unlimited contributions as long as the donors are identified and reported online in 24 hours.
bongbong
(5,436 posts)Interestingly, "Unlimited labor union contributions" is monetarily exactly equal to:
The pocket change found in the sofas of billionaires that hate Democracy & send money to repigs.
former9thward
(32,039 posts)If you go to opensecrets.com you will find the contributions from different groups to whatever candidate you choose. President Obama has plenty of billionaire friends like Sores and Buffet and he is doing just fine in that area. Obama and Romney will both have the money they need to run their campaigns.
bongbong
(5,436 posts)Your response was to somebody else's post, since mine was about the size of union contributions vs. billionaires.
former9thward
(32,039 posts)Assertions are fine. I like to see facts.
bongbong
(5,436 posts)The fact is you made up a Strawman post that had nothing to do with mine. I guess that is some kind of "rebuttal".
Corporate slush funds outnumber union contributions not by number of times, but by orders of magnitude. If you hadn't attempted to malign my original post with your mis-direction/Strawman, I would've provided the data. But I don't do work for people who post such crap.
Faux pas
(14,686 posts)NashvilleLefty
(811 posts)They only contribute the amount that they think they can afford to lose. Although it seems enough for several people to retire on, it's nothing to these people.
That's part of the problem.
Auntie Bush
(17,528 posts)our elections...doubt it!
doc03
(35,356 posts)be by a very thin margin. If he doesn't win Democrats will blame CU for it.
Greybnk48
(10,168 posts)the money WILL have a huge impact down ticket. It always does. Look what happened to Feingold in our state of Wisconsin. An idiot like Ron Johnson won because of well crafted messages against him and relentless ads that Feingold did not match.