Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

rainlillie

(1,095 posts)
Fri Jan 6, 2017, 12:17 PM Jan 2017

Can someone tell me why this case wasn't classified as a hate crime too.

"According to the lawsuit, the 18-year-old victim was called names including Kool-Aid,

chicken-eater,” “watermelon” and the N-word by his football teammates beginning in the summer of 2015."




"A former Idaho high school football player originally charged with sexually assaulting his mentally disabled teammate will avoid jail time and escape classification as a sex offender after pleading guilty to a lesser felony.

John R.K. Howard, 19, of Keller, Tex., pleaded guilty to a felony count of injury to a child and will be sentenced to two to three years of probation and up to 300 hours of community service, the Idaho Statesmen reported. A judge will decide the final sentence on Feb. 24.

Deputy Attorney General Casey Hemmer said if the case had gone to trial, prosecutors would have been able to prove Howard kicked a coat hanger into his teammate’s rectum during the October 2015 attack — but a modified guilty plea submitted by the teen allows him to maintain his innocence while still acknowledging he would have otherwise been convicted.

Howard initially faced up to life in prison, a fine as much as $50,000 and registration as sex offender."
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2016/12/19/1612774/-Looks-like-no-jail-time-for-white-teen-who-sexually-assaulted-black-disabled-student-with-coathanger

http://www.ktvb.com/news/crime/white-dietrich-football-players-accused-of-raping-mentally-disabled-black-teammate-in-locker-room/214759380
36 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Can someone tell me why this case wasn't classified as a hate crime too. (Original Post) rainlillie Jan 2017 OP
I'm in total agreement about hate crimes should include attacks upon the physically, mentally, and/o no_hypocrisy Jan 2017 #1
Yes, I remember that horrible case. In the case I posted about the victim is rainlillie Jan 2017 #2
I think though the hate crime charge is based on race dsc Jan 2017 #4
The victim was African American and the predators were white. rainlillie Jan 2017 #5
I meant in the other case that got the hate crime charge dsc Jan 2017 #7
That doesn't mean it is a hate crime. Ace Rothstein Jan 2017 #8
The parents claim the victim was racially harassed before the assault. rainlillie Jan 2017 #10
Well then it very well could have been a hate crime. Ace Rothstein Jan 2017 #14
You can hear it on the tape DURING the assault, for God's sake... whathehell Jan 2017 #17
I'm glad the victim in that crime is going to get justice, but the victim in the case I posted about rainlillie Jan 2017 #18
Got you. n/ t. whathehell Jan 2017 #30
Really? whathehell Jan 2017 #13
Yes, really. Ace Rothstein Jan 2017 #16
Not really in this instance. If you "don't know many of the details of this case", go learn them whathehell Jan 2017 #29
If I had to guess, a different state with different laws HoneyBadger Jan 2017 #3
I thought hate crimes were federal crimes. rainlillie Jan 2017 #6
Not always HoneyBadger Jan 2017 #11
It seems this should have been classified as such... The racial taunts before the assault rainlillie Jan 2017 #15
Hate crimes are based on the attack being perpitrated based on some protected status. Hate kelly1mm Jan 2017 #9
According to the lawsuit, the 18-year-old victim was called names including Kool-Aid, rainlillie Jan 2017 #12
You should add that to the OP as the sections you quote do not mention that at all. nt kelly1mm Jan 2017 #21
Okay. rainlillie Jan 2017 #23
That just shows that the teammates were racist... SaschaHM Jan 2017 #22
Can't give an answer sarisataka Jan 2017 #19
Yeah, it's beyond my comprehension why there was no jail time. this is a perfect example.. rainlillie Jan 2017 #20
"Scary Black or Brown Person of the Day" is a regular feature of television news in the U.S.A.. hunter Jan 2017 #24
I see.. whathehell Jan 2017 #31
WTF? Where did I say that? hunter Jan 2017 #33
Hate crime runs to motivation, not the identity of the victim. Yo_Mama Jan 2017 #25
Melanin... coco22 Jan 2017 #26
Because Lil Missy Jan 2017 #27
It seems the racial taunts prior to the assault is what should have been considered. rainlillie Jan 2017 #28
Oh, for God's sake.. whathehell Jan 2017 #32
The prosecutor decided to not charge it as a racial hate crime mythology Jan 2017 #34
White and black people are treated differently in the Justice system HipChick Jan 2017 #35
Can you answer a question for me? Sissyk Jan 2017 #36

no_hypocrisy

(46,116 posts)
1. I'm in total agreement about hate crimes should include attacks upon the physically, mentally, and/o
Fri Jan 6, 2017, 12:21 PM
Jan 2017

emotionally disabled.

Here's a famous case from my home state of New Jersey almost 30 years ago: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Glen_Ridge_rape

rainlillie

(1,095 posts)
2. Yes, I remember that horrible case. In the case I posted about the victim is
Fri Jan 6, 2017, 12:28 PM
Jan 2017

African American and the predators are white. The victim was also mentally disabled.

dsc

(52,162 posts)
7. I meant in the other case that got the hate crime charge
Fri Jan 6, 2017, 12:38 PM
Jan 2017

in the ID case it appears race wasn't involved (at least not overtly) while in the IL case racial epithets against whites were used.

Ace Rothstein

(3,163 posts)
8. That doesn't mean it is a hate crime.
Fri Jan 6, 2017, 12:39 PM
Jan 2017

The problem with this case is that there should not have been a plea and the perp should have done jail time.

Ace Rothstein

(3,163 posts)
14. Well then it very well could have been a hate crime.
Fri Jan 6, 2017, 12:52 PM
Jan 2017

I'm just stating white on black or black on white doesn't classify a crime as a hate crime.

whathehell

(29,067 posts)
17. You can hear it on the tape DURING the assault, for God's sake...
Fri Jan 6, 2017, 12:57 PM
Jan 2017

"Fuck whites" "Fuck Trump", and, oh yeah, some insults about his mental disability...Nice folks.

rainlillie

(1,095 posts)
18. I'm glad the victim in that crime is going to get justice, but the victim in the case I posted about
Fri Jan 6, 2017, 01:00 PM
Jan 2017

will have to seek justice via the civil courts.

whathehell

(29,067 posts)
13. Really?
Fri Jan 6, 2017, 12:48 PM
Jan 2017

I wonder how many would have e said that if the racial.situation were reversed, and judging from recent and not so recent history, I'm guessing zero to none..

Ace Rothstein

(3,163 posts)
16. Yes, really.
Fri Jan 6, 2017, 12:54 PM
Jan 2017

I don't know many of the details of this case, it very well could have been a hate crime. Just because a crime is white on black or black on white doesn't mean it was a hate crime. The Chicago case appears to be because the perps repeatedly said "fuck white people" during said crimes.

whathehell

(29,067 posts)
29. Not really in this instance. If you "don't know many of the details of this case", go learn them
Fri Jan 6, 2017, 02:30 PM
Jan 2017

The assault was taped and is available on at least one other thread here.

As to your "just becauses", I'm well.aware that every interracial crime is not automatically a "hate" crime and said nothing

that would have indicated that to be my understanding. As I said, you need to educate yourself on the case, as most here have done.

rainlillie

(1,095 posts)
15. It seems this should have been classified as such... The racial taunts before the assault
Fri Jan 6, 2017, 12:53 PM
Jan 2017

should have been enough.

kelly1mm

(4,733 posts)
9. Hate crimes are based on the attack being perpitrated based on some protected status. Hate
Fri Jan 6, 2017, 12:43 PM
Jan 2017

crimes are not based of the victim(s) and perpetrated different racial/disability/religious/gender status. You seem to be implying that any crime where the victim and perpetrator are different races or differently abled or different religions or different genders would be a hate crime. Am I wrong in that assumption?

Perhaps what we need is an 'enhancement' like for crimes against police officers for crimes against the disabled????

rainlillie

(1,095 posts)
12. According to the lawsuit, the 18-year-old victim was called names including Kool-Aid,
Fri Jan 6, 2017, 12:47 PM
Jan 2017

chicken-eater,” “watermelon” and the N-word by his football teammates beginning in the summer of 2015.'
Sounds like a hate crime to me.

SaschaHM

(2,897 posts)
22. That just shows that the teammates were racist...
Fri Jan 6, 2017, 01:06 PM
Jan 2017

not that they committed the crime because he was black or mentally disabled. The prosecution would have to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the individual's status was the motive for the attack. Hence why hate crimes prosecutions are rare. They may have singled him out because he was black or mentally disabled, but absent a confession on their part, private motives such as those are very hard to prove to juries. Few people are going to say "I attacked him because he was black". Yes, the taunts could be used as evidence to paint a bigger case, but on their own they don't prove motive. They just prove that racists were using racist language and that's not a crime.

(I went down this rabbit hole yesterday since apparently the party that passed a Federal Hate Crimes bill doesn't understand that it is about motive not status.)

sarisataka

(18,656 posts)
19. Can't give an answer
Fri Jan 6, 2017, 01:02 PM
Jan 2017

as it could quite easily be considered a hate crime. Also the downgrading of charges and plea deals to allow this to become a probationary sentence is disgusting.

rainlillie

(1,095 posts)
20. Yeah, it's beyond my comprehension why there was no jail time. this is a perfect example..
Fri Jan 6, 2017, 01:05 PM
Jan 2017

as to why some minorities feel the justice system doesn't work for them.

hunter

(38,313 posts)
24. "Scary Black or Brown Person of the Day" is a regular feature of television news in the U.S.A..
Fri Jan 6, 2017, 01:21 PM
Jan 2017

That's one of the reasons I don't watch that crap. My television only plays movies. I don't suffer television advertising or propaganda.

I read the local newspapers and get my national and international news from more reputable sources.

The BBC is still pretty good, with some biases about international financial markets. They don't go looking for dirt in those. But they're not nearly so bad as NPR's constant groveling at the feet of Big Money. Oh, look, we have happy today, stocks are rising! Oh no, we have sads, stocks are falling!

News sources like CNN or MSNBC are just irritating. News-like stuff. Pasteurized process cheese product. FOX news is, of course, a public toilet that's rarely cleaned.

whathehell

(29,067 posts)
31. I see..
Fri Jan 6, 2017, 03:21 PM
Jan 2017

so you only consider it credible if a White person is "the scary person of the day". Got it.

hunter

(38,313 posts)
33. WTF? Where did I say that?
Fri Jan 6, 2017, 03:36 PM
Jan 2017

But it's absolutely true I have no fondness for the affluent white culture I grew up in. I have no patience with "tolerant" white people who think that makes them special. Whoop-de-doo. Tolerance is bullshit. Celebrating diversity is the only way to go.

As a kid, starting maybe in the sixth grade, I was called "queerbait" and frequently beaten bloody.

The best thing I ever did was quit high school and flee that culture.

I wish the Democratic Party would stop pandering to the sort of affluent white guys who voted for Trump or didn't vote at all. We ought to be the party of EVERYONE else.

Yo_Mama

(8,303 posts)
25. Hate crime runs to motivation, not the identity of the victim.
Fri Jan 6, 2017, 01:25 PM
Jan 2017

So it's always a bit of an issue as to proof.

If you ask me, the earlier stuff goes to show that it is hate crime, and a good prosecutor should be able to get that in at trial.

Lil Missy

(17,865 posts)
27. Because
Fri Jan 6, 2017, 01:37 PM
Jan 2017

I see nothing to indicate he attacked the victim because he is mentally disabled. Perhaps he's an Equal Opportunity Asshole.

whathehell

(29,067 posts)
32. Oh, for God's sake..
Fri Jan 6, 2017, 03:29 PM
Jan 2017

They called him names on the BASIS of his mental disorder, so it seems they were not "unaware" of it...Stop reaching, already.



Sissyk

(12,665 posts)
36. Can you answer a question for me?
Fri Jan 6, 2017, 03:54 PM
Jan 2017

I'm having trouble finding out about the actions taken against the two minors that were involved in this horrible case. What happen d to them? Also, this horrid kid (Howard) gets "sentenced" in February.

They all deserve much more!

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Can someone tell me why t...