General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsDoes anyone still trust Edward Snowden?
I don't think he's going to get an Obama pardon...
http://www.wsj.com/articles/the-fable-of-edward-snowden-1483143143
Mr. Snowdens narrative also includes the assertion that he was neither debriefed by nor even met with any Russian government official after he arrived in Moscow. This part of the narrative runs counter to findings of U.S. intelligence. According to the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence report, Mr. Snowden, since he arrived in Moscow, has had, and continues to have, contact with Russian intelligence services. This finding is consistent with Russian debriefing practices, as described by the ex-KGB officers with whom I spoke in Moscow
Mr. Snowden also publicly claimed in Moscow in December 2013 to have secrets in his head, including access to every target, every active operation. Full lists of them. Could Mr. Snowdens Russian hosts ignore such an opportunity after Mr. Putin had authorized his exfiltration to Moscow? Mr. Snowden, with no exit options, was in the palm of their hands. Under such circumstances, as Mr. Klintsevich pointed out in his June NPR interview: If theres a possibility to get information, they [the Russian intelligence services] will get it.
The transfer of state secrets from Mr. Snowden to Russia did not occur in a vacuum. The intelligence war did not end with the termination of the Cold War; it shifted to cyberspace. Even if Russia could not match the NSAs state-of-the-art sensors, computers and productive partnerships with the cipher services of Britain, Israel, Germany and other allies, it could nullify the U.S. agencys edge by obtaining its sources and methods from even a single contractor with access to Level 3 documents.
Russian intelligence uses a single umbrella term to cover anyone who delivers it secret intelligence. Whether a person acted out of idealistic motives, sold information for money or remained clueless of the role he or she played in the transfer of secretsthe provider of secret data is considered an espionage source. By any measure, it is a job description that fits Mr. Snowden.
markpkessinger
(8,401 posts)kimbutgar
(21,182 posts)Fast Walker 52
(7,723 posts)Glassunion
(10,201 posts)Your evidence of this is what?
kimbutgar
(21,182 posts)If you know what keys to use you can give them to someone who knows what they are going. Snowden is a traitor in my opinion.
Glassunion
(10,201 posts)The moment an employee, contractor, etc... goes south, all access they have to any system is squashed.
Any access to these "codes", "back doors" or "programs" you are referring to disappear if a relationship heads south.
How long was it before he ended up in Russian hands? Trust me, by that time, every connection to any code or program he had access to, was severed.
I highly doubt that "esnowden.fbi.gov" had any access privileges whatsoever.
think
(11,641 posts)Some other people listed at the link support his pardon as well:
https://pardonsnowden.org/supporters
Fast Walker 52
(7,723 posts)Though it would be good to bring him back here somehow... maybe a pardon is the only way
Rage4Bacon
(43 posts)Was there a better way to let everyone know about all the illegal spying on the masses? Probably... but it's easy to armchair quarterback things in retrospect. It was obvious that using the "official" channels wasn't working... people tried that previously and it didn't turn out well for them.
MADem
(135,425 posts)Last edited Mon Jan 2, 2017, 05:56 PM - Edit history (1)
Since he worked in Japan, and vacationed in (surprise, surprise) HONG KONG.
Who knows where the Russian consulate is in HK? It's tucked away in a high rise building, hard to find if you don't know right where you're going...
I am convinced he was turned back then, and was rewarded for his perfidy.
Enjoy those Russian winters, Comrade Eddy.
think
(11,641 posts)pardon for Snowden.
I doubt any of them think Snowden is a double agent. Nor does Amnesty International and the ACLU.
https://pardonsnowden.org/supporters
MADem
(135,425 posts)matter to me, but I wouldn't trust a one of them around an NSA briefing.
I'll bet a lot of those endorsements are OLD, too.
vi5
(13,305 posts)..(and make no mistake with your defense of those actions, many of you clearly did), then just WAIT to see those things under President Trump!
Which is, you know....kind of what a bunch of us were warning about.
Rage4Bacon
(43 posts)you should have thought about that before now. It's not like its some big secret that presidents change and someone you might not like will get in there. Such shortsightedness.
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)It could be they do not trust him either. Another thought, if there are those who thinks he should be pardoned then he must be responsible for the crimes in which he is charged. With the charges of espionage and theft of government files and the delivery of those files without proper permission, an admission by Snowden, then a person should not be given.
Ready4Change
(6,736 posts)Actually, he is still alive. But he is no longer in control of his destiny. He, and all his assets are now assets of Russia, and they have been and will continue to serve the whims of Russia.