General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsElizabeth Warren Asks Newly Chatty FBI Director to Explain Why DOJ Didnt Prosecute Banksters
Elizabeth Warren Asks Newly Chatty FBI Director to Explain Why DOJ Didnt Prosecute Banksters
David Dayen
September 15 2016, 12:00 a.m.
LIKE A LOT OF other Americans, Sen. Elizabeth Warren wants to know why the Department of Justice hasnt criminally prosecuted any of the major players responsible for the 2008 financial crisis.
On Thursday, Warren released two highly provocative letters demanding some explanations. One is to DOJ Inspector General Michael Horowitz, requesting a review of how federal law enforcement managed to whiff on all 11 substantive criminal referrals submitted by the Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission (FCIC), a panel set up to examine the causes of the 2008 meltdown.
The other is to FBI Director James Comey, asking him to release all FBI investigations and deliberations related to those referrals. The FBI typically doesnt release investigative details about cases that the DOJ chooses not to pursue, but Warren pointed out that in releasing information about presidential candidate Hillary Clintons use of a private email server in July, Comey had pretty much shattered that precedent and set a new one.
You explained these actions by noting your view that the American people deserve those details in a case of intense public interest, Warren wrote to Comey. If Secretary Clintons email server was of sufficient interest to establish a new FBI standard of transparency, then surely the criminal prosecution of those responsible for the 2008 financial crisis should be subject to the same level of transparency..
~Snip~
And the FCIC named names, specifying nine top-level executives who should be investigated on criminal charges: CEO Daniel Mudd and CFO Stephen Swad of Fannie Mae; CEO Martin Sullivan and CFO Stephen Bensinger of AIG; CEO Stan ONeal and CFO Jeffrey Edwards of Merrill Lynch; and CEO Chuck Prince, CFO Gary Crittenden, and Board Chairman Robert Rubin of Citigroup...
Read more:
https://theintercept.com/2016/09/15/elizabeth-warren-asks-newly-chatty-fbi-director-to-explain-why-doj-didnt-prosecute-banksters/
JudyM
(29,270 posts)And, um, where's Harry Reid been all this time?
still_one
(92,373 posts)think
(11,641 posts)will understand who is really fighting for THEM if Democrats can get their message to those voters.
The Senate Democrats plan to utilize video and social media to take their message straight to voters in 2017. This could help in an era where big news outlets do more to confuse than inform...
still_one
(92,373 posts)really will get it before it is too late
Plucketeer
(12,882 posts)Hell, it's the voters that got us where we are! What sort of threshold do we have to cross before they wake up to reality???
dmosh42
(2,217 posts)Congress avoided due to the bank lobby power.
cstanleytech
(26,319 posts)the idea of Warren as President would do to them?
PoliticAverse
(26,366 posts)cstanleytech
(26,319 posts)they would have just accused her of being a flip flopper.
On the brightside her chances should be even better in 2020 than 2016 if Trump drops the ball like I suspect he will and if the Democrats work to tie him like an anchor around the neck of every single Republican in office that expressed even a tiny % of support for the man we all win.
PoliticAverse
(26,366 posts)think
(11,641 posts)by Laurence Arnold - July 8, 2015, 10:45 AM EDT
The former attorney general is giving his critics a new round of ammunition by returning to Covington & Burling, whose corporate clientele has included Bank of America, Citigroup, JPMorgan Chase and Wells Fargo.
This is an excerpt from Bloomberg's daily Opening Line column.
The day Eric Holder became U.S. attorney generalFeb. 3, 2009a front-page story in the New York Times declared, Wall St., a Financial Epithet, Stirs Outrage and Punch Lines. Bloomberg headlined a story, FDIC Boosts Estimate for U.S. Bank Failures Costs.
Holder had no shortage of top priorities during his years at the Justice Department: voting rights, cybersecurity, drug laws. But given what was going on when he took office, he was bound to be measured on how his Justice Department responded to the worst financial crisis since the Great Depression.
He had his moments, including a string of multibillion-dollar penalties against financial institutions that culminated with a $16.7 billion settlement with Bank of America. But as Tom Schoenberg wrote last fall, Holder spent much of his almost-six-year tenure defending the Justice Departments record of few Wall Street prosecutions.
Holder, who left office in April, is giving his critics a new round of ammunition by returning to Covington & Burling, the Washington-based law firm with a corporate clientele that has included Bank of America, Citigroup, JPMorgan Chase and Wells Fargo. ..
Read more:
https://www.bloomberg.com/politics/articles/2015-07-08/eric-holder-s-job-prospects-were-too-big-to-fail
OldYallow
(90 posts)It would be Holder, Obama, Warren and Sanders ~ vs ~ The entire system. All other Republicans and Almost all other Democrats would be on the side of the banks one way or the other. It would have taken all of PBO's "political capital" to dispense "justice".
The system is rigged folks.
Prisons are for poor people, not FBI Directors, and Banksters.
C Moon
(12,221 posts)Lurks Often
(5,455 posts)Warren could also Loretta Lynch why she hasn't done more to go after the bankers while Lynch was in charge of the DOJ.
It's always been up to the AG and the prosecutors in the DOJ on when and when not to prosecute someone.
PoliticAverse
(26,366 posts)gladium et scutum
(808 posts)of Holder's boss. The Attorney General does not operate as an independent government entity. The DOJ's operation is the responsibility of the President of the United States. Holder reported to the President. I would expect that many conversations were held between the AG and the President on this subject. The content of these conversations may reveal the rational for not making an all out effort to criminally prosecute those individuals that may have had culpable responsibility for the financial crisis.
SomeGuyInEagan
(1,515 posts)The fix is in, same as it ever was.
At least they used to do it behind closed doors and pretend it is a Republic.
zentrum
(9,865 posts)Elizabeth Warren.
Stellar
(5,644 posts)Dustlawyer
(10,497 posts)annabanana
(52,791 posts)ProudProgressiveNow
(6,129 posts)Scurrilous
(38,687 posts)Dark n Stormy Knight
(9,771 posts)when Hell freezes over and pigs fly.
(Though some might say Trump being elected counts as a pig flying, so hey, halfway there.)
cstanleytech
(26,319 posts)has made it clear who he answers to and what matters and justice and the American people aren't even in his top 100.
oasis
(49,401 posts)to get in front of the cameras for the manufactured e-mail bullshit.
harun
(11,348 posts)frankieallen
(583 posts)Justice
(7,188 posts)If evidence and decision making into Clinton's emails required airing of charges/decisions, then so does evidence and decision making into financial crisis.
harun
(11,348 posts)Status quo being it's always okay to go after BS stories and never okay to go after the real criminals on Wall St.