Trump people believe Trump received more negative coverage than Hillary Clinton.

[kentuck]

If he didn't, it wasn't because he didn't deserve it.

Every day was another story that should have ended his campaign, but it didn't.

He should have received much more negative coverage than Hillary Clinton but he didn't.

He earned all the negative press he received and much more.

[Leith]

1. Only If They Consider Showing Him Saying His Own Words

to be "negative coverage."

[Bucky]

2. There were more negative things about him to cover

It's called news. Jeez, these fuckers keep on complaining even when they win

[unblock]

3. "negative" coverage isn't just black and white, as it were.

they covered rotten things he said, and said there was much outrage about it, but always in a way that kept him in the running.

it reminded me of when howard stern was first getting big, people were shocked by what he said, but they were all dying to hear what outrageous thing he'd say next.

the media gave exactly that *favorable* treatment of toxic trump's rotten dumps, and rarely gave him the treatment they give "disqualified" candidates, such as third party candidates other than perhaps ross perot.


they portrayed him as entertaining, rather than as a very serious threat to our country.

[InAbLuEsTaTe]

4. Now THAT is a hoot... cept were stuck with that racist psychopath.

[OldYallow]

5. Hillary Got Far More Negative Coverage

I don't care what lying Kellyanne babbled.

[Uponthegears]

6. Yes, but they also believe

That aliens are controlling their thoughts with x-rays

[Arkansas Granny]

7. His fans have a persecution complex. If DT isn't being praised to high heaven the

perceive it to be criticism.

[underpants]

8. He was on the air constantly

He even released a statement when the campaign was low on money saying that he would rely on the press coverage of how great he was. They did. Ratings are ratings.