Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsQuinn signs bill requiring retirees to pay part of health insurance
Gov. Pat Quinn today approved legislation requiring thousands of retired state employees to chip in on the costs of health care insurance that many of them get for little or nothing.
The law attempts to rein in the states rising costs but also seeks to share the expense with the 78,000 retirees who pay no premiums for their insurance now.
--clip--
Currently, retired legislators get free premium health insurance after four years, retired judges after six years and retired state and university employees after 20 years of service one of the most generous plans in the country.
The annual cost to taxpayers is nearly $800 million and threatens to hit $1 billion in the new budget year that begins next month if left unchecked, according to legislative supporters.
http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/local/breaking/chi-quinn-signs-bill-requiring-retirees-to-pay-part-of-health-insurance-20120621,0,2875681.story
For the most part I wanted to post this because it struck me as a further encroachment against public sector employees -- in Illinois no less.
Then I read how legislators get free lifetime health insurance after only 4 years. FOUR YEARS?!?!? Not only are the public workers getting the shaft but the lawmakers had no problem feathering their own nests in order to contribute to the funding shortfall.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
5 replies, 1928 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (7)
ReplyReply to this post
5 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Quinn signs bill requiring retirees to pay part of health insurance (Original Post)
Nuclear Unicorn
Jun 2012
OP
I think I would rather extend their benefits to others rather than remove theirs. This just feeds
Ed Suspicious
Jun 2012
#4
elleng
(130,976 posts)1. Amazing to me that they haven't, til now.
Fed employees contribute to premiums, along w the govt, and have co-pays. No 'encroachment'' at all. Its reasonable.
IllinoisBirdWatcher
(2,315 posts)2. Meanwhile IL Teachers have ALWAYS Paid
One of the little-reported issues in Illinois was the huge inequality of retirement benefits. Teachers have always paid toward retirement health insurance (while the Teacher Retirement System was grossly and continuously underfunded by the state) while Legislators paid ZERO for retirement insurance (and always funded THEIR pension system at a higher level than others).
Nuclear Unicorn
(19,497 posts)3. IL legislator
Sounds like a nice job if you can afford to buy one.
Ed Suspicious
(8,879 posts)4. I think I would rather extend their benefits to others rather than remove theirs. This just feeds
into the selfish, "I got mine" GOP way of thinking.
Teamster Jeff
(1,598 posts)5. Race to the bottom