General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsHere's The Law That Poses The Greatest Threat To Donald Trump
The Stock Acts author explains the insider trading law will be extremely difficult for the next president to follow if he keeps his businesses.
12/21/2016 07:01 am ET | Updated 2 hours ago
Michael McAuliff
Senior Congressional Reporter, The Huffington Post
WASHINGTON ― By walking onto the inaugural platform outside the Capitol and putting his hand on a Bible on Jan. 20, Donald Trump may be stepping closer to committing a felony than he ever imagined when he launched his unlikely bid to become the nations 45th president.
Thats because Congress passed a law in 2012 called the Stock Act, which explicitly bars the president, members of Congress and senior executive branch officials from using their insider knowledge to make money.
Obeying the law is not especially difficult for most people. But most people do not have access to the immense amount of secret information that presidents deal with every day. And no presidents before have been billionaires with business holdings spread around the world.
The law is clear in saying that the president cannot do anything that resembles helping friends, family members or himself to make a profit off of information he gains from doing his job.
Its the same as it applies to the American people, said Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand (D-N.Y.), the lead author of the Stock Act. You cannot trade on nonpublic information. That is a criminal violation of the law.
more
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/stock-act-donald-trump_us_5859c045e4b0d9a594566921
sarcasmo
(23,968 posts)Let me use the way back machine to see if I can find the segment.
progressoid
(49,991 posts)Isn't that quaint.
dixiegrrrrl
(60,010 posts)a la North Carolina.
Bettie
(16,110 posts)demand that the DOJ not prosecute such things and come down on states that dare to try.
He'll break the law and receive zero consequences.
TheFrenchRazor
(2,116 posts)sheshe2
(83,785 posts)yallerdawg
(16,104 posts)sheshe2
(83,785 posts)TygrBright
(20,760 posts)lastlib
(23,241 posts)Nixon said, "If the president does it, then it's not illegal."
So apparently, the law doesn't apply to presidents who are billionaires and have YUUuuuge hands, ifyaknowwhutImean............
JudyM
(29,251 posts)and dining and traveling with parties interested in the outcome of S Ct cases, they pay it no mind and it's only going to get worse than ever under this configuration that starts next month.
When we get back in power, I hope our congress critters have the integrity to establish tougher standards for all 3 branches.
bigbrother05
(5,995 posts)look at all the legal crap thrown at Clinton and implied toward Obama. Bill made it easy for them to pull down the barriers, but Obama was too careful for them to get much traction.
Dems care about and tend to respect the rule of law. The GOP only sees the law as a way to control others and as an inconvenience delay for their plans.
unblock
(52,243 posts)they'll set up some special court or some sham cover to pretend they're still enforcing the law.
but they won't let some federal prosecutor screw up their good times just because their leader is a crook.
yurbud
(39,405 posts)If they feel betrayed by him, being preyed for insider trading would be the least of his worries.
hunter
(38,317 posts)If he screws with them or their businesses they'll crush him like a bug.
yurbud
(39,405 posts)Candidate in the first place).
progressoid
(49,991 posts)tenorly
(2,037 posts)GOP congresscritters and the incoming kangaroo majority in the Supreme Court will see to that.
Javaman
(62,530 posts)I'm not holding my breath.
we have gone down the rabbit hole never to return.
Bernardo de La Paz
(49,002 posts)Javaman
(62,530 posts)but I place zero faith in the concept that at some point the gop will all come to their collective senses.
Bernardo de La Paz
(49,002 posts)tRump knows how to obtain and keep a very loyal core base, but is going to lose a lot of leaners and wobbly people.
Response to Bernardo de La Paz (Reply #22)
Bernardo de La Paz This message was self-deleted by its author.
Bernardo de La Paz
(49,002 posts)tblue37
(65,393 posts)IronLionZion
(45,447 posts)hughee99
(16,113 posts)is going to repeal the law to protect him?
IronLionZion
(45,447 posts)hughee99
(16,113 posts)IronLionZion
(45,447 posts)so it really alters the boundaries of what's possible anymore
hughee99
(16,113 posts)Crunchy Frog
(26,587 posts)Like all dictators, he will be the law. Who is going to be able to stop him?