Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

LaydeeBug

(10,291 posts)
Mon Dec 19, 2016, 06:36 PM Dec 2016

There are Nat'l Sec Implications to Twitler Keeping a Private Security Force

As the daughter of an Army Officer, I well know it.

Just *imagine* if President Gore had installed his own private security, or *ANY* other dem? Nope. These Hatriots will endorse this shit.

What if the private security turns on him, because they can be bribed?

7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
There are Nat'l Sec Implications to Twitler Keeping a Private Security Force (Original Post) LaydeeBug Dec 2016 OP
And what happens if they go up against the Secret Service? SharonAnn Dec 2016 #1
Secret Service will love this KT2000 Dec 2016 #2
Mercenaries are not reliable. haele Dec 2016 #3
What's this about? Is he actually going to do that? n/t rzemanfl Dec 2016 #4
Worse malaise Dec 2016 #5
He *is* though. nt LaydeeBug Dec 2016 #7
Who pays for this "private" force? cheyanne Dec 2016 #6

KT2000

(20,585 posts)
2. Secret Service will love this
Mon Dec 19, 2016, 06:46 PM
Dec 2016

They will be accompanied by guys in fatigues, combat boots,helmets and rifles and who knows what other weapons.

haele

(12,665 posts)
3. Mercenaries are not reliable.
Mon Dec 19, 2016, 06:46 PM
Dec 2016

They do all sorts of dumbshit things because there's no solid set of overarching rules of engagement and interactions for the command structure to enforce. And they're easy to bribe; most mercenaries are cynical and loyal only to their paycheck. They also know they're the first ones to be blamed if anything goes wrong, the first ones in the line of fire if their employer is a dumb-ass narcissistic walking target.

While Drumphf's CoS may be loyal - and I have no doubt he is - and thinks of himself as "Donnie's good buddy", further down the chain, they're just working for the paycheck and the lulz, as the kids nowadays say.
And they know if it doesn't work out there, hey - some other rich f-wad will be willing to hire them to stand around, work-out when not on duty, pack some serious heat they don't have to pay for, and otherwise play Hollywood bad-ass.

Haele

cheyanne

(733 posts)
6. Who pays for this "private" force?
Mon Dec 19, 2016, 07:16 PM
Dec 2016

These guys will need to be vetted by someone, like the NSA. We need to know if these people are a security risk. Will they have access to the White House or will they be housed elsewhere. Another big cost. I don't see how they wouldn't interfer with the Secret Service.

By the way, usually only demogogues run around with a personall bodyguard.

Actually, Trump is a demogogue.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»There are Nat'l Sec Impli...