General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsJoe the Plumber: Bible More Accurate Than Science Books Because It’s Never Been Revised
http://littlegreenfootballs.com/article/40510_Joe_the_Plumber-_Bible_More_Accurate_Than_Science_Books_Because_Its_Never_Been_Revised
clang1
(884 posts)They are even liars about the bible. How to fight that?
krkaufman
(13,435 posts)> They are even liars about the bible. How to fight that?
Trouble is, they're not necessarily liars. They *really* are that uninformed, stupid, and, sadly, willfully ignorant.
elleng
(130,974 posts)Who WROTE the Bible????
clang1
(884 posts)I think to them, it fell out of the sky. Rather like a coke bottle, eh.
EOTE
(13,409 posts)Thanks for reminding me about it, I probably haven't seen it in decades.
clang1
(884 posts)lob1
(3,820 posts)American Standard Version, English Standard Version, King James Version, New American Standard, New International Version, New King James Version, New Living Translation, New Revised Standard, Revised Standard Version, etc.
HiPointDem
(20,729 posts)putting in and taking out books in different periods.
The Old Testament is the first section of the two-part Christian Biblical canon, which includes the books of the Hebrew Bible or protocanon and in some Christian denominations also includes several Deuterocanonical books or Biblical apocrypha.
Martin Luther, holding to Jewish and other ancient precedent, excluded the deuterocanonical books from the Old Testament of his translation of the Bible, referred to as Luther's canon, placing them in a section he labeled "Apocrypha" (not equal to Scripture but edifying), thus dissenting from the canon which Trent would affirm in the year Luther died (1546).
Other churches also differed on the canonicity of certain books, and as a result, Orthodox Christians, Catholics and Protestants use different canons which differ with respect to the texts which are included in the Old Testament and with respect to the Antilegomena of the New Testament...
The differences between the Hebrew Bible and other versions of the Old Testament such as the Samaritan Pentateuch, the Syriac, Latin, Greek, Ge'ez and other canons, are more substantial. Many of these canons include books and even sections of books that the others do not. For a fuller discussion of these differences, see Books of the Bible.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Development_of_the_Old_Testament_canon
What about further back than that even. Are there not some books in the bible for which there have been multiple versions found? Or portions of?
pokerfan
(27,677 posts)dixiegrrrrl
(60,010 posts)Jim Lane
(11,175 posts)Thanks for that interesting chart. Where would the LDS Church fit in? Is it within the thick green line for Protestantism, or an offshoot of that line, or would it be on a separate line diverging in the 19th century from the red Western Rites line?
Retrograde
(10,137 posts)If every sect were represented the green line would be rather fractally.
Theology aside, I find the LDS to have more in common with Catholicism that most Protestant sects: unified dogma, male-only priesthood, hierarchical structure, changes in doctrine coming about as revealed truth to the man on top.
Jim Lane
(11,175 posts)Certainly the LDS Church follows the Reformation in rejecting the authority of the Pope, but it substitutes the authority of a Prophet who has a similar role. That's why I thought it might be more accurately graphed as a split from the red line. Besides the rejection of the Pope, did Mormon theology take anything from the Reformation?
Retrograde
(10,137 posts)I'd argue that they're not technically Christian, as they don't subscribe to all the tenets of the Nicene Creed (the belief that Jesus was once just a man, and that men can become gods, for example), but for the most part they come out of US Protestantism, with liberal doses of Freemasonry and early 19th century pseudo-archeology. There were a lot of similar cults in upstate New York during the Great Awakening, but for some reason this is the one that thrived, something I attribute to able and charismatic leaders. They're one of a kind.
I'm not an expert on Mormon theology, just someone with an interest in American history. Catholic theology, though - I suppose 12 years in Catholic school counts for something.
Jim Lane
(11,175 posts)I'll bet that Joe, newly in the public eye as an expert on Christianity, couldn't tell us a thing about the Nicene Creed.
What prompted the calling of the First Council of Nicaea was the dispute over the nature of Jesus. This is considered a disagreement within Christianity. By your definition, however, the Arians weren't Christians. I don't think you can retroactively deem them to be non-Christians just because their side got stomped at the Council.
I'm also no expert on Mormon theology. For what it's worth, my understanding is that the LDS Church maintains that salvation comes only through Jesus. That qualifies them under my definition of Christianity.
clang1
(884 posts)Last edited Fri Jun 22, 2012, 01:29 AM - Edit history (1)
What about American Christians? From what I understand they are a sect of the Catholic Church.
What do you think about the Baptists not calling themselves Christians? Where do they fit into the timeline?
JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)fact that Paul just kind of invented his own version of Christianity. He may have known people who actually knew Jesus during Jesus' short life, but Paul never spoke to Jesus. He may have spoken to Jesus' spiritual presence, but certainly not to the man himself while he walked the Earth.
And then, of course, some of the books of the Old Testament are clearly simply literature, good literature maybe, but just good stories. The Song of Solomon????
Here is Wikipedia on the history of the Bible. Prior to the printing press, manuscripts were copied by hand and, of course, subject to potential alterations with each copy.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Bible_and_history
Few Americans read Hebrew or Greek. We generally don't even read Latin. I would bet that Joe the Plumber reads one of the English versions of the Bible: King James Bible, New Revised Standard or one of the others. Special revisions for those of us who read the Bible in English.
lob1
(3,820 posts)JHB
(37,161 posts)Ones which take "inspired" (but old) translations like the KJV and "paraphrase" (don't say translate!) them into "contemporary English".
Because that's holy and revealed by God, not like the people go back to the oldest writings they can and "find something new". They obviously have an agenda, because catering to modern perceptions is the devil's work. And paraphrasing isn't catering. Really.
Blanks
(4,835 posts)sarge43
(28,941 posts)The two versions of creation -- the order in which creation took place and the creation of humanity. Was man and woman created together in god's image or was woman created from man's rib?
Xyzse
(8,217 posts)I don't know any one else who could pull that off as well as this guy.
sarge43
(28,941 posts)Tommy Lee has it down to an art form.
Yes!
smirkymonkey
(63,221 posts)couldn't find the words.
aquart
(69,014 posts)Genesis is lousy with them.
pokerfan
(27,677 posts)teamster633
(2,029 posts)I wonder if my old link to it still works?
sarge43
(28,941 posts)freshwest
(53,661 posts)So baggers speek lolzcatz.
Hoo knew?
steve2470
(37,457 posts)I'm sure he's proud of it, too.
clang1
(884 posts)Our country is fucking infested with Snake Oil salesmen. At all levels of society.
cthulu2016
(10,960 posts)How many different ways is that wrong?
ThoughtCriminal
(14,047 posts)high ratio of (Things Wrong/Number of words).
EFerrari
(163,986 posts)Posteritatis
(18,807 posts)DFW
(54,408 posts)He can read Aramaic, Hebrew and Ancient Greek?
Who knew?
sarisataka
(18,663 posts)Learning all those languages so I could read the original texts.
I don't believe in the Ten Commandments yet but I have some good leads on the Ark of the Covenant...
chemenger
(1,593 posts)sarisataka
(18,663 posts)I gave up being a Nazi for Lent.
DFW
(54,408 posts)ThoughtCriminal
(14,047 posts)who just might be dumber than Sarah Palin.
Blue Owl
(50,427 posts)n/t
alcibiades_mystery
(36,437 posts)clang1
(884 posts)lol
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)And little wonder. Prayer isn't going to get the shit out of a clogged drainpipe.
Behind the Aegis
(53,961 posts)patrice
(47,992 posts)NC_Nurse
(11,646 posts)mindwalker_i
(4,407 posts)He knows his target audience, just like Rush and a lot of Republicans. They know they're full of shit, but their followers believe it. the importance of truth, accuracy, and logic depend on what one's goals are. When people don't pay attention to those and want their leaders to say things that reinforce the people's ideologies, truth, accuracy, and logic are actually bad things.
clang1
(884 posts)Ding ding ding. Hell yes they know they spout nothing but filth and drivel.
EFerrari
(163,986 posts)appleannie1
(5,067 posts)the Bible to make it "easier" to read. That is why the meanings have been changed to fit what people people believe in whatever time frame they live.
Angry Dragon
(36,693 posts)the biggest idiot in the country
Joe is in the running
LuckyLib
(6,819 posts)Entrants from every corner of the country.
Marr
(20,317 posts)it gives us light at night, when it would be dark otherwise. The sun only shines during the day, when the world is already well-lit.
You're making my head hurt
Ilsa
(61,695 posts)RainDog
(28,784 posts)clang1
(884 posts)Isn't it sickening.
Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)If i wanted Jobless Joe's pastor's opinion, I would ask him for it.
Come to think about it, I didn't ask for Jobless Joe's opinion, either; why am I receiving it?
KansDem
(28,498 posts)One of their resident wuckfits makes an inane comment and it's all over the news for days. It's like they just sit and utter some nonsense, then the media goes apeshit and it becomes "news."
Then when that "story" dies down, another wuckfit makes another stupid remark and the pattern is repeated...over and over.
I suppose the question is, "How does one become a resident wuckfit and make big bucks?"
Blanks
(4,835 posts)Please let me know.
wordpix
(18,652 posts)with unlimited guns to protect them.
The repukes are very good at hiding their real agenda and even get the poor to join them, riling them up with anti-health care, anti-gay marriage, anti-abortion & contraceptives, family values rhetoric.
Actually, I think many repug leaders are gay - McConnell, Lindsay Graham, Jeff Sessions, David Dreier all come to mind, so why is the party so against gay marriage? And how many repugs have helped their girlfriends get abortions? I'm guessing quite a few. So all these issues are sideshows to detract from the main event: corporate takeover of US without restrictions or regulations, and with a sea of guns in the hands of those who are easily manipulated.
Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)Here's a funny fact about the 2nd amendment.
It's the only portion of the bill of rights that is largely unavailable to the poor - except in so much that an aggressively-wielded bottle of Worcestershire sauce could count as "arms."
How do you think Republicans would vote on a bill that would provide a gun and standard training to any comer, in a manner similar to Switzerland's policy?
Downtown Hound
(12,618 posts)There's a big piece of shit where your brain is supposed to be that's clogging up your whole system. Be a good plumber and clean it out.
ForgoTheConsequence
(4,869 posts)There is a version called the New REVISED Standard Version.
TrogL
(32,822 posts)His lot prefer the New Interational Version. Note "new" and "version". It's not pretty.
fishwax
(29,149 posts)agent46
(1,262 posts)It is seriously an alternate reality. This is America now. Which means we're on our own.
Think I'll have another beer.
MindMover
(5,016 posts)The bible or holy bible has been translated, revised, and interpreted hundreds of times, if not thousands....and there really is not a complete bible today because of all the redaction's, revisions, and other changes made over the centuries....
and I should know, I went to bible school in college......
HeiressofBickworth
(2,682 posts)that HIS pastor got his "degree" from one of those mail-in colleges for he apparently doesn't know the history of the very book he is using to instruct his flock. It is once again a fascinating thing to behold how the righties can use each side of their brain to come to very different conclusions that bear no resemblance to facts. I never went to bible school, I'm not even a christian and I know more about the bible than some of these brain-dead idiots.
agent46
(1,262 posts)is the "idea" of the bible. Nobody actually reads it anymore, let alone studies it like you did. Makes it so much easier to use for political purposes.
Maybe in some twisted way, we deserve Joe the Plumber.
BlueMTexpat
(15,369 posts)Not content with foisting Palin upon us, he initiated this idiot's seemingly endless 15 minutes of infamy.
LeftishBrit
(41,208 posts)So I suppose Joe the Plumber only reads the earliest available versions? Wow. I didn't know he could read both Hebrew and Greek!
Octafish
(55,745 posts)Donte Brown
(6 posts)Solly Mack
(90,773 posts)ananda
(28,866 posts)Revision is a good thing. It's how we correct mistakes.
That's why many scientific observations are called theories and not cemented facts, because the theory changes as new information becomes available.
Also, it's true that religion and its sacred texts is more fluid than concrete as well, changing many times over history. Not only that, but even that same religion takes on varying ideas and contexts depending on the time and the region. Take, for example, the Gnostic Gospels and varous sects that have a distinct eastern influence.
I often think that a good way to read sacred texts is to think of them as fiction in content and truth in wisdom as the reader takes it through his or her own mind and independent critical thinking and life experience. They have never been intended to serve as science texts, not then, not now.. but rather as a means to come at deep spiritual truths that can serve us in our own journeys toward enlightenment and evolution.
deutsey
(20,166 posts)tex-wyo-dem
(3,190 posts)I absolutely agree with you.
The problem with many sects of modern Christianity as well as other religions is that their sacred texts are presented as literal facts (the absolute word of god that needs no interpretation) rather than fables rich in metaphor and anecdote that reqires the reader to think between the lines to truly get it.
The Bible has been translated and revised so many times over the history of its existence that it's difficult to say how much was lost in translation (either accidentally or purposefully) from the original texts. Not to mention parts that were just conveniently left out.
wandy
(3,539 posts)every word in the bible to hair cloth clothed monks, you will then want to believe that god dictated every word in the bible to hair cloth clothed monks.
And by these words it will be so.
Add the fact that science sometimes becomes a bit inconvenient and then naturally the bible is more accurate than science books because its never been revised.
Mark my words. At some point in time some great right wing leader will proclaimer that gravity is as false as global warming.
All of reality will change and we will begin to see religious right wing wackos jumping off roofs in an attempt to 'ascend'.
My my; do you think we could get Al Gore to give some talks about the dangers of gravity?
sakabatou
(42,158 posts)Then please, Joe, explain the diversity of versions? Also, you have no fucking clue about how science works.
KG
(28,751 posts)they live...
justiceischeap
(14,040 posts)not the King James version but the New International version. The reason I note this is because the original texts didn't actually have a word for homosexuality and repubs like to use the bible as a tool against my people. It's also a factual (I know, pesky little things repubs like to ignore) accounting of a revision.
I know repubs hate to be educated--they think it's all elitist and such--but according to the dictionary (pick your own version) this is the meaning of version:
A particular form of something differing in certain respects from an earlier form or other forms of the same type of thing.
alphafemale
(18,497 posts)JHB
(37,161 posts)If a book does not say it was revised then it was never revised. Only a running dog out to destroy our beloved homeland would suggest otherwise.
Is obvious, nyet?
lunatica
(53,410 posts)It must be work to come up with something so stupid that it out-stupids your last stupidity depths.
Skinner
(63,645 posts)...but came to precisely the wrong conclusion.
malaise
(269,054 posts)Shakes head
CBHagman
(16,986 posts)...history, language, theology, church politics.
Lucy Goosey
(2,940 posts)They're ignorant of that, too - not just of the specifics of various scientific theories/facts/phenomena, etc., but they don't really seem to know what science itself or the scientific method are.
randr
(12,412 posts)Island Blue
(5,817 posts)in a hole in the back yard and Joe should be out of work. There is some science involved in the modern toilet.
marmar
(77,081 posts)nt
jtuck004
(15,882 posts)deutsey
(20,166 posts)A real Renaissance man, he is.
spanone
(135,844 posts)wordpix
(18,652 posts)Rambis
(7,774 posts)FailureToCommunicate
(14,014 posts)Ikonoklast
(23,973 posts)The problem is, there is a bottomless pit of dumbass and Joe the Fake Plumber keeps mining it.
GreatCaesarsGhost
(8,584 posts)i don't believe Joe even has a pastor.
Arkana
(24,347 posts)Someone needs to tell ol' Joe that the timer ran out on his 15 minutes 4 years ago.
sinkingfeeling
(51,460 posts)Hebrew, Aramaic, and Greek. It's never been touched by any human hand.
bullwinkle428
(20,629 posts)mulsh
(2,959 posts)n/t
JoePhilly
(27,787 posts)hifiguy
(33,688 posts)leaves me speechless. Yowsers.
Marrah_G
(28,581 posts)catbyte
(34,403 posts)I'm overdosing on Stupid these days.
Javaman
(62,530 posts)Autumn
(45,107 posts)and there isn't any cure for that.
rustydog
(9,186 posts)Is this not a form of taking the Lord's name in vain? It isn't just cursing, right?
4th law of robotics
(6,801 posts)Don't know what to make of this.
jwirr
(39,215 posts)idiot.
Botany
(70,516 posts)TBF
(32,067 posts)Plumber Joe has no use for that ... it's the devil's work.
LynneSin
(95,337 posts)dixiegrrrrl
(60,010 posts)herberto55
(6 posts)Enough said.
CJCRANE
(18,184 posts)Never a miscommunication.
You can't explain that. You can't explain why the tide goes in.
SCVDem
(5,103 posts)Teach it like it is!
Hugabear
(10,340 posts)Unless it's in the original language, then it's been revised.
CJCRANE
(18,184 posts)that God speaks.
derby378
(30,252 posts)hifiguy
(33,688 posts)Didn't Frothy say that?
tclambert
(11,087 posts)wordpix
(18,652 posts)Maybe he'll pause for brief thinking on that one.
Odin2005
(53,521 posts)They are unable to comprehend that all scientific knowledge is provisional and subject to falsification. A science-based worldview in incompatible with the notion of "Absolute Truth", and Authoritarian personalities need "Absolute Truth".
Initech
(100,081 posts)Liberalman777
(35 posts)They show where and when the Bible was revised..Things Like When the concept of Hell originally was a temporary state and then over the centuries was "Made" Permanent . Hell wasn't even in the original Bible and not placed there until the 2nd century.
Suji to Seoul
(2,035 posts)I guess that New Testament is just a work-in-progress, right, Joey!?!?!
Fuckstick!
tsuki
(11,994 posts)progressoid
(49,991 posts)Zoeisright
(8,339 posts)He should be required to repeat grades 1-6.
benld74
(9,904 posts)nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)laugh, cry... what.
JOE, here is a little thing you obviously do not know... not only has it been revised, not once, not twice, but several times.
Oy vey shmeer!
JonLP24
(29,322 posts)The fact that science is constantly changing indicates it is accurate. What he is saying if science stuck to it's original theories that would prove science is accurate.
whopis01
(3,514 posts)just so you had to keep buying new ones so that you could do your homework assignments properly.
Crowman1979
(3,844 posts)AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH!!!!!!!!!!!
Crowman1979
(3,844 posts)shanti
(21,675 posts)librechik
(30,674 posts)the lack of education is serving the Republicans who advocate it very well.
clang1
(884 posts)Isn't it though.
sulphurdunn
(6,891 posts)from Adolf Hitler to Henry Kissinger have made it clear that for most people their perception of what is true is far more important than what actually is true.
Fire Walk With Me
(38,893 posts)muriel_volestrangler
(101,321 posts)How fucking low must your self-esteem be now? How much must you feel that your fellow Republicans despise you, that they'd choose a moron over you as their candidate?
JNelson6563
(28,151 posts)aint_no_life_nowhere
(21,925 posts)They seem almost human.
Taverner
(55,476 posts)So they can't hurt anyone
I'm all for locking wingnuts in cages!!!!
Taverner
(55,476 posts)And - fuck - I can't even argue with this kind of stupid
Posteritatis
(18,807 posts)MineralMan
(146,317 posts)of The Bible, right next to my King James version and two books away from my Jefferson Bible.
Hasn't been revised, eh? You betcha, Joe!
neeksgeek
(1,214 posts)The Bible has most certainly been revised. There are many versions (go into any secular bookstore and compare them). There are books that were left out. It's been translated into God knows how many languages. To claim that it is unchanged from the time of the original stories is just ignorant, whether you believe that it is ultimately "God's Word" or just a book.
Jesus and his disciples did not go around the Holy Land carrying copies of the New International Version!
Scientists revise existing writings when new information comes to light. Religious zealots would rather ban books and place original thinkers under house arrest (if they're lucky). See Galileo.
Dirty Socialist
(3,252 posts)The Bible's followers are more hard-headed than other people.
glinda
(14,807 posts)backscatter712
(26,355 posts)I have a copy of the King James version, the New International Version, the NET Bible and the New Revised Standard Version.
That's just in my personal possession. There are hundreds of versions of the Bible, just in English.
obxhead
(8,434 posts)PatrynXX
(5,668 posts)he's stupid. so depending on which version of the bible your reading.... let alone the new book is a revised version of the bible and that um that word shows up in certain version of the bible that guy would not be on any team fighting for the bible. he'd drop the ball a long ways back. (what is RSV??? ) go ahead joe say it??? personally I prefer the KJV not the NKJV
Most Lutherans use the NIV.
hamsterjill
(15,222 posts)I'd not seen the bumper sticker before, and I just had to laugh. It read:
Joe-the-Plumber
Meet
Barack-the-President
complain jane
(4,302 posts)rateyes
(17,438 posts)Revised Standard Version.
Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)The Old Testament or the New.
tclambert
(11,087 posts)The bible says the Sun goes around the Earth. And it says the value of Pi is 3.0 even. Can't fix it, 'cause they won't revise it.
Science used to say our galaxy was the only one. Then we found out some of those fuzzy patches in the sky were more galaxies. Update the books!
Science becomes more accurate through the process of stepwise refinement. Einstein's theory of gravity didn't refute nor replace Newton's. It added another level of precision.
Nevernose
(13,081 posts)And a few other "interesting" things.
pokerfan
(27,677 posts)The basic trouble, you see, is that people think that "right" and "wrong" are absolute; that everything that isn't perfectly and completely right is totally and equally wrong.
However, I don't think that's so. It seems to me that right and wrong are fuzzy concepts, and I will devote this essay to an explanation of why I think so.
The Relativity of Wrong
frogmarch
(12,154 posts)tanyev
(42,568 posts)Canuckistanian
(42,290 posts)My eyes aren't capable of rolling 360 degrees on this one....
Brooklyn Dame
(169 posts)WHY have his 15 minutes of fame been extended?!?
http://borderlessnewsandviews.com/2012/06/turn-the-screws-on-joe-the-plumber/
barbtries
(28,799 posts)did i hear that he's running for public office? hope his would be constituents are running in the opposite direction.
clang1
(884 posts)No. These are the type people that get elected to office in the climate in which we currently live.
Historic NY
(37,451 posts)perhaps with lightening bolts.
Jerry Frey
(32 posts)The Bible is not the verbally inspired inerrant word of God. It was "revised" when the Epistle of Barnabas was removed and the Gospel of Peter was excluded. For POSITIVE Facts about Christianity, pls visit:
http://napoleonlive.info/judas-the-galilean/
Wurzelbacher is a dim bulb, lost like an atheist.
MNBrewer
(8,462 posts)he said it....
Get a Brain, Morans!
Swede
(33,257 posts)Come on over and snake it.
RagAss
(13,832 posts)McCamy Taylor
(19,240 posts)God, what an idiot.
southerncrone
(5,506 posts)PLEEEEEASE....let's institute a literacy/aptitude test to get a voter's registration!
And this ignoramus is running for US Congress. America drowns in a sea of stupidity......
Clouseau2
(60 posts)If you took Sarah Palin and gave her a sex change and a lobotomy, you'd end up with Joe the Plumber.
jonthebru
(1,034 posts)"Think for yourself because I won't be there with you."
This guy is a professional publicity seeker. Like the guy who wins hot dog eating contests...
FedUpWithIt All
(4,442 posts)rks306
(116 posts)This man is an IDIOT. Anyone that votes for him should lose their rights to be a citizen.
Deep13
(39,154 posts)truth2power
(8,219 posts)I used to be a member of a UU church (long story about that).
One time, a member of the UUA spoke at one of our services. She said:
God is one;
God is love;
And revelation is not sealed. (Uh...this last is a good thing as far as UU's are concerned.)
p.s. Great graphic, pokerfan.
Tsiyu
(18,186 posts)No reading about modern plumbing techniques for Joe! Blasphemy!
All he can do is dig latrines and cisterns and pray over your problem.
No science. No siree. Jesus didn't have a toilet and he turned out great!
lpbk2713
(42,759 posts)Isn't there a hymn that goes ... "Bringing in the sheep, bringing in the sheep" ?
Joe the Dumber, he's a laff riot.