Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

pokerfan

(27,677 posts)
Thu Jun 21, 2012, 12:42 AM Jun 2012

Joe the Plumber: Bible More Accurate Than Science Books Because It’s Never Been Revised



Wurzelbacher explained how his pastor, who seems to believe that faith and science are incompatible, noted that while science textbooks have several new editions, the Bible has never been revised. ”Revision Seven.’ He said, ‘now look at the Bible, what does it say’? I said, ‘Holy Bible.’ He said, ‘see any revisions on it Joe’? I said, ‘no.’ He said, ‘the reason why is because this is God’s word…man’s always looking for an answer, that’s why it’s revised.”

http://littlegreenfootballs.com/article/40510_Joe_the_Plumber-_Bible_More_Accurate_Than_Science_Books_Because_Its_Never_Been_Revised
191 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Joe the Plumber: Bible More Accurate Than Science Books Because It’s Never Been Revised (Original Post) pokerfan Jun 2012 OP
re: Joe the Plumber: Bible More Accurate Than Science Books Because It’s Never Been Revised clang1 Jun 2012 #1
not necessarily "liars" krkaufman Jun 2012 #175
Logical, right??? elleng Jun 2012 #2
re: Logical, right??? clang1 Jun 2012 #18
I so love that movie! EOTE Jun 2012 #61
re: I so love that movie! clang1 Jun 2012 #167
How about the King James "Version"? lob1 Jun 2012 #3
and pokerfan Jun 2012 #13
not to mention the various ecclesiastical councils that decided what should be in the bible -- HiPointDem Jun 2012 #24
revisions clang1 Jun 2012 #31
oh yeah, that was just for starters pokerfan Jun 2012 #37
Thanks for that graphic. dixiegrrrrl Jun 2012 #91
+1 n/t clang1 Jun 2012 #165
Question about Christianity (nothing to do with Joe the Plumber) Jim Lane Jun 2012 #121
Splits off from Protestanism in the 19th century IMHO Retrograde Jun 2012 #122
It's because of your point about unified dogma that I'm not sure about graphing the LDS Church. Jim Lane Jun 2012 #128
They're hard to categorize Retrograde Jun 2012 #148
You're probably the first person to mention the Nicene Creed in a thread about Joe the Plumber. Jim Lane Jun 2012 #172
re: oh yeah, that was just for starters clang1 Jun 2012 #169
And then there are the Gnostic Gospels and the simple but often forgotten JDPriestly Jun 2012 #42
And don't forget the more recent "Bible for Dummies". lob1 Jun 2012 #46
Would that be "paraphrased bibles"? JHB Jun 2012 #56
Faith and history are also incompatible n/t Blanks Jun 2012 #143
The bible starts with a revision. sarge43 Jun 2012 #51
I love that picture Xyzse Jun 2012 #71
The "When you were born, the doc slapped your mother, right?" look. sarge43 Jun 2012 #188
LOL Xyzse Jun 2012 #190
Winner - that just says for me exactly what I wanted to express but smirkymonkey Jun 2012 #132
The created from a rib bit is a Sumerian pun. aquart Jun 2012 #147
That's a good point pokerfan Jun 2012 #159
Letting Go Of God is such an awesome piece. teamster633 Jun 2012 #178
At least before running mouth about it, minimum read the first couple of chapters of that book. n/t sarge43 Jun 2012 #189
Ure jus makin dat up, u commie pinko liar! freshwest Jun 2012 #36
Ignorance and stupidity, all personified in one man steve2470 Jun 2012 #4
re: Ignorance and stupidity, all personified in one man clang1 Jun 2012 #6
That's beautiful... it suggests a contest cthulu2016 Jun 2012 #5
The beauty is in the remarkable ThoughtCriminal Jun 2012 #9
There's a whole blog in that idea. EFerrari Jun 2012 #23
It is wrong on all of the levels, which are themselves also wrong. It is fractally wrong. (nt) Posteritatis Jun 2012 #130
Wurzelbacher is full of surprrises DFW Jun 2012 #7
I know I had a tough time sarisataka Jun 2012 #21
Just don't open it! chemenger Jun 2012 #96
I think I'll be ok sarisataka Jun 2012 #124
What is Indiana Jones doing posting here? n/t DFW Jun 2012 #136
Yes, it seems incredible - but there are Republicans ThoughtCriminal Jun 2012 #8
The Lord commands thee to return to plumbing and be silent Blue Owl Jun 2012 #10
ROFL alcibiades_mystery Jun 2012 #14
re: The Lord commands thee to return to plumbing and be silent clang1 Jun 2012 #15
Dude wasn't even an actual plumber, though Warren DeMontague Jun 2012 #49
.... Behind the Aegis Jun 2012 #11
Oh, Jesus! patrice Jun 2012 #12
Wow. Why does anyone give that loser the time of day? NC_Nurse Jun 2012 #16
Thing is, he probably knows how stupid that is mindwalker_i Jun 2012 #17
re: Thing is, he probably knows how stupid that is clang1 Jun 2012 #20
LMAO EFerrari Jun 2012 #19
It has been revised countless times. Where the heck has he been? Every generation revises appleannie1 Jun 2012 #22
I do believe the republicans have a contest to find Angry Dragon Jun 2012 #25
It's such a massive contest it will be difficult to determine a winner. LuckyLib Jun 2012 #146
And the moon is more important than the sun because Marr Jun 2012 #26
Stop that TrogL Jun 2012 #119
OMG. That's a keeper! nt Ilsa Jun 2012 #134
these people get paid good salaries to say that crap, too n/t RainDog Jun 2012 #27
re: these people get paid good salaries to say that crap, too n/t clang1 Jun 2012 #30
"Explains how his pastor..." Scootaloo Jun 2012 #28
Funny how they just keep shoveling this shit at us KansDem Jun 2012 #84
If you figure it out. Blanks Jun 2012 #145
religion, pro-life, etc. are all a smokescreen to get the real agenda through: corporatocracy wordpix Jun 2012 #100
Actually, very limited guns Scootaloo Jun 2012 #135
Hey, Joe the Plumber Downtown Hound Jun 2012 #29
What a moron. ForgoTheConsequence Jun 2012 #32
That's actually One of the better translations TrogL Jun 2012 #120
wow. fishwax Jun 2012 #33
I'm convinced this isn't stupidity agent46 Jun 2012 #34
Make mine an Orval..... MindMover Jun 2012 #35
It is abundantly obvious HeiressofBickworth Jun 2012 #40
All we really have now agent46 Jun 2012 #45
This is another issue that I have with John McCain. BlueMTexpat Jun 2012 #38
The Holy Bible has never been revised? LeftishBrit Jun 2012 #39
Coptic, too. Octafish Jun 2012 #79
Spam deleted by OKNancy (MIR Team) Donte Brown Jun 2012 #41
I wonder who waters the pastor. Solly Mack Jun 2012 #43
Ermm... ananda Jun 2012 #44
"a means to come at deep spiritual truths" deutsey Jun 2012 #63
Good analysis... tex-wyo-dem Jun 2012 #171
In right wing reality, when you are told to believe that god dictated..... wandy Jun 2012 #47
*bashes head in* sakabatou Jun 2012 #48
too stupid to see the science they don't believe in has basically created the modern world in which KG Jun 2012 #50
1973 was the first year the word "Homosexual" appeared in the bible justiceischeap Jun 2012 #52
These people plumb new depths of stupid every day. nt alphafemale Jun 2012 #53
Awww, lay off Comrade Joe, the Model Soviet Citizen JHB Jun 2012 #54
Stupid has worked really well for Joe The Plumber lunatica Jun 2012 #55
The amazing thing is that he nailed the important difference... Skinner Jun 2012 #57
This moron is even dumber than I first thought malaise Jun 2012 #58
It's hard to decide what they're most ignorant of... CBHagman Jun 2012 #59
And don't forget science! Lucy Goosey Jun 2012 #187
This guy is giving plumbers a bad name randr Jun 2012 #60
By that logic we should all be crapping Island Blue Jun 2012 #62
He is dumber than a rusted drain pipe. marmar Jun 2012 #64
And far less useful. n/t jtuck004 Jun 2012 #105
He's a political scientist who offers insightful analyses of socialism AND he's a biblical scholar deutsey Jun 2012 #65
back to plumbing dumbass spanone Jun 2012 #66
he's not a plumber - he was unemployed but I don't know now... wordpix Jun 2012 #101
Joe the plumber- Not a joe, nor a plumber discuss Rambis Jun 2012 #140
He's like butter...only... with ass crack showing FailureToCommunicate Jun 2012 #151
He's been plumbing the depths of dumbass ever since we were made aware of his existence. Ikonoklast Jun 2012 #186
I'm a non-believer GreatCaesarsGhost Jun 2012 #67
Is this idiot still flapping his yapper? Arkana Jun 2012 #68
That's right Joe, your Bible is written on the original papyrus in sinkingfeeling Jun 2012 #69
I think we can retire the title of "Dumbest Mofo to ever run for Congress". bullwinkle428 Jun 2012 #70
joe the fabrication is about as informed as I expected. mulsh Jun 2012 #72
He was hit with a ton of bricks alright. JoePhilly Jun 2012 #73
The breathtaking stupidity of that assertion hifiguy Jun 2012 #74
SUch stunning ignorance should never be given air time except perhaps on the smoking gun.... Marrah_G Jun 2012 #75
I hope Marcie Kaptur buries that bald-headed idiot in November catbyte Jun 2012 #76
We now live in the age of Stupidity for Profit. nt Javaman Jun 2012 #77
The fact is, that boy is dumber than a fucking rock Autumn Jun 2012 #78
Dear Gawd, does this man know how poorly he reflects plumbers? rustydog Jun 2012 #80
Er . . . huh 4th law of robotics Jun 2012 #81
Never revised? There are dozens of versions and they do not all use the same meanings. He is an jwirr Jun 2012 #82
Joe the Plumber hasn't heard of the google? Botany Jun 2012 #83
Google? Science created Google. TBF Jun 2012 #95
Here's Matthew 25:40 from 20 different bible versions LynneSin Jun 2012 #85
Stealing your marvelous graphic. dixiegrrrrl Jun 2012 #86
Stupid Is As Stupid Does herberto55 Jun 2012 #87
Tide goes in, tide goes out. CJCRANE Jun 2012 #88
Without honesty, there is no truth. SCVDem Jun 2012 #89
What language is Joe the Plumber's Bible written in? Hugabear Jun 2012 #90
It's in the original King James English CJCRANE Jun 2012 #92
Preacheth it, brother! derby378 Jun 2012 #103
Hey, English was good enough for Jeebus. hifiguy Jun 2012 #110
Pretty sure God speaks Old Gallifreyan. tclambert Jun 2012 #152
Stupid should explain: Bible More Accurate Than the Constitution Because It’s Never Been Revised wordpix Jun 2012 #93
Sam the Moron just proved my hypothesis for why these morons hate science. Odin2005 Jun 2012 #94
What is he smoking and where might I obtain some??? Initech Jun 2012 #97
Joe needs to Watch the History Channel and It's Shows about the Bible Liberalman777 Jun 2012 #98
He said, ‘see any revisions on it Joe’? I said, ‘no.’ Suji to Seoul Jun 2012 #99
It was revised everytime a monk hand copied it. nt tsuki Jun 2012 #102
joe... progressoid Jun 2012 #104
Oh my god, he's even more fucking stupid than I thought. Zoeisright Jun 2012 #106
Bu,,,? Wha,,,? Ho,,,? Wh,,,? (@#%(*@#R(*U@(F*@#(*R@#*J#(U#)@(U benld74 Jun 2012 #107
Err, don't know what to do with this one nadinbrzezinski Jun 2012 #108
OMG JonLP24 Jun 2012 #109
If the bible had problems at the end of each chapter, the publishers would revise it every year whopis01 Jun 2012 #111
What the...been hundreds of...where the.........?!?!?!? Crowman1979 Jun 2012 #112
Well its official! Joe the Dumber is a Troll! Crowman1979 Jun 2012 #113
DERP shanti Jun 2012 #114
I really mourn for the average knowledge bank of Americans librechik Jun 2012 #115
re: the lack of education is serving the Republicans who advocate it very well. clang1 Jun 2012 #174
Demagogues sulphurdunn Jun 2012 #116
Bible? Never been revised? Fire Walk With Me Jun 2012 #117
Imagine you're Steve Kraus, and you lost a primary to this idiot muriel_volestrangler Jun 2012 #118
Where I come from we call this: A Special Kind of Stupid. JNelson6563 Jun 2012 #123
It's fun to point and laugh at wingnuts like we do with zoo animals aint_no_life_nowhere Jun 2012 #125
Problem is we don't have the wingnuts in cages Taverner Jun 2012 #127
Um, the bible has been revised COUNTLESS times! Taverner Jun 2012 #126
Council of Nicaea for you on line one, Joe. (nt) Posteritatis Jun 2012 #129
But wait...I have a Revised Standard Version MineralMan Jun 2012 #131
Oh, please! neeksgeek Jun 2012 #133
Never been Revised Because... Dirty Socialist Jun 2012 #137
ummmmm...what rhymes with "plumber"... glinda Jun 2012 #138
Just on my Nook or on my bookshelf, I count four separate versions of the Bible. backscatter712 Jun 2012 #139
I wonder if he's an Old Testement or a New Testement kind of guy? obxhead Jun 2012 #141
it's called faith but Joe decided PatrynXX Jun 2012 #142
Probably old news, but I just saw a bumper sticker hamsterjill Jun 2012 #144
Screw him and the dinosaur he rode in on complain jane Jun 2012 #149
Three words rateyes Jun 2012 #150
Joe doesn't know which came first Spitfire of ATJ Jun 2012 #153
The reason science is more accurate is precisely because it's been revised so many times. tclambert Jun 2012 #154
Also says the Earth is flat. Nevernose Jun 2012 #155
Reminds me of an essay by Isaac Asimov pokerfan Jun 2012 #160
I am not surprised he's that ignorant frogmarch Jun 2012 #156
Ach, Gott im Himmel. tanyev Jun 2012 #157
Oy, Hillbilly philosophy Canuckistanian Jun 2012 #158
OMG...This fool makes my arse itch. Brooklyn Dame Jun 2012 #161
he really is stupid, isn't he? barbtries Jun 2012 #162
re: hope his would be constituents are running in the opposite direction. clang1 Jun 2012 #176
OMG..........can we just euthanize the stupid.... Historic NY Jun 2012 #163
learn something new Jerry Frey Jun 2012 #164
I thought for sure this was an exaggeration... but nope... MNBrewer Jun 2012 #166
Joe,the shitter's plugged. Swede Jun 2012 #168
When will this guy just go plunge a fucking turd? RagAss Jun 2012 #170
Yep, yep. Matthew and Moses speak and wrote English. McCamy Taylor Jun 2012 #173
And these stupid-ass MFers are running our lives! southerncrone Jun 2012 #177
If ... Clouseau2 Jun 2012 #179
To quote the great English poet George Harrison jonthebru Jun 2012 #180
... FedUpWithIt All Jun 2012 #181
Really rks306 Jun 2012 #182
What a fucking ignoramus. nt Deep13 Jun 2012 #183
God Almighty!!! (You should excuse the expression).... truth2power Jun 2012 #184
Wow. He must be a lousy plumber Tsiyu Jun 2012 #185
He's going for ALL the dog whistles. lpbk2713 Jun 2012 #191
 

clang1

(884 posts)
1. re: Joe the Plumber: Bible More Accurate Than Science Books Because It’s Never Been Revised
Thu Jun 21, 2012, 12:43 AM
Jun 2012

They are even liars about the bible. How to fight that?

krkaufman

(13,435 posts)
175. not necessarily "liars"
Fri Jun 22, 2012, 01:31 AM
Jun 2012

> They are even liars about the bible. How to fight that?

Trouble is, they're not necessarily liars. They *really* are that uninformed, stupid, and, sadly, willfully ignorant.

EOTE

(13,409 posts)
61. I so love that movie!
Thu Jun 21, 2012, 07:43 AM
Jun 2012

Thanks for reminding me about it, I probably haven't seen it in decades.

pokerfan

(27,677 posts)
13. and
Thu Jun 21, 2012, 12:57 AM
Jun 2012

American Standard Version, English Standard Version, King James Version, New American Standard, New International Version, New King James Version, New Living Translation, New Revised Standard, Revised Standard Version, etc.

 

HiPointDem

(20,729 posts)
24. not to mention the various ecclesiastical councils that decided what should be in the bible --
Thu Jun 21, 2012, 01:14 AM
Jun 2012

putting in and taking out books in different periods.

The Old Testament is the first section of the two-part Christian Biblical canon, which includes the books of the Hebrew Bible or protocanon and in some Christian denominations also includes several Deuterocanonical books or Biblical apocrypha.

Martin Luther, holding to Jewish and other ancient precedent, excluded the deuterocanonical books from the Old Testament of his translation of the Bible, referred to as Luther's canon, placing them in a section he labeled "Apocrypha" (not equal to Scripture but edifying), thus dissenting from the canon which Trent would affirm in the year Luther died (1546).

Other churches also differed on the canonicity of certain books, and as a result, Orthodox Christians, Catholics and Protestants use different canons which differ with respect to the texts which are included in the Old Testament and with respect to the Antilegomena of the New Testament...

The differences between the Hebrew Bible and other versions of the Old Testament such as the Samaritan Pentateuch, the Syriac, Latin, Greek, Ge'ez and other canons, are more substantial. Many of these canons include books and even sections of books that the others do not. For a fuller discussion of these differences, see Books of the Bible.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Development_of_the_Old_Testament_canon

 

clang1

(884 posts)
31. revisions
Thu Jun 21, 2012, 01:36 AM
Jun 2012

What about further back than that even. Are there not some books in the bible for which there have been multiple versions found? Or portions of?

 

Jim Lane

(11,175 posts)
121. Question about Christianity (nothing to do with Joe the Plumber)
Thu Jun 21, 2012, 01:35 PM
Jun 2012

Thanks for that interesting chart. Where would the LDS Church fit in? Is it within the thick green line for Protestantism, or an offshoot of that line, or would it be on a separate line diverging in the 19th century from the red Western Rites line?

Retrograde

(10,137 posts)
122. Splits off from Protestanism in the 19th century IMHO
Thu Jun 21, 2012, 01:41 PM
Jun 2012

If every sect were represented the green line would be rather fractally.

Theology aside, I find the LDS to have more in common with Catholicism that most Protestant sects: unified dogma, male-only priesthood, hierarchical structure, changes in doctrine coming about as revealed truth to the man on top.

 

Jim Lane

(11,175 posts)
128. It's because of your point about unified dogma that I'm not sure about graphing the LDS Church.
Thu Jun 21, 2012, 02:13 PM
Jun 2012

Certainly the LDS Church follows the Reformation in rejecting the authority of the Pope, but it substitutes the authority of a Prophet who has a similar role. That's why I thought it might be more accurately graphed as a split from the red line. Besides the rejection of the Pope, did Mormon theology take anything from the Reformation?

Retrograde

(10,137 posts)
148. They're hard to categorize
Thu Jun 21, 2012, 05:50 PM
Jun 2012

I'd argue that they're not technically Christian, as they don't subscribe to all the tenets of the Nicene Creed (the belief that Jesus was once just a man, and that men can become gods, for example), but for the most part they come out of US Protestantism, with liberal doses of Freemasonry and early 19th century pseudo-archeology. There were a lot of similar cults in upstate New York during the Great Awakening, but for some reason this is the one that thrived, something I attribute to able and charismatic leaders. They're one of a kind.

I'm not an expert on Mormon theology, just someone with an interest in American history. Catholic theology, though - I suppose 12 years in Catholic school counts for something.

 

Jim Lane

(11,175 posts)
172. You're probably the first person to mention the Nicene Creed in a thread about Joe the Plumber.
Fri Jun 22, 2012, 12:35 AM
Jun 2012

I'll bet that Joe, newly in the public eye as an expert on Christianity, couldn't tell us a thing about the Nicene Creed.

What prompted the calling of the First Council of Nicaea was the dispute over the nature of Jesus. This is considered a disagreement within Christianity. By your definition, however, the Arians weren't Christians. I don't think you can retroactively deem them to be non-Christians just because their side got stomped at the Council.

I'm also no expert on Mormon theology. For what it's worth, my understanding is that the LDS Church maintains that salvation comes only through Jesus. That qualifies them under my definition of Christianity.

 

clang1

(884 posts)
169. re: oh yeah, that was just for starters
Thu Jun 21, 2012, 11:27 PM
Jun 2012

Last edited Fri Jun 22, 2012, 01:29 AM - Edit history (1)

What about American Christians? From what I understand they are a sect of the Catholic Church.

What do you think about the Baptists not calling themselves Christians? Where do they fit into the timeline?

JDPriestly

(57,936 posts)
42. And then there are the Gnostic Gospels and the simple but often forgotten
Thu Jun 21, 2012, 03:31 AM
Jun 2012

fact that Paul just kind of invented his own version of Christianity. He may have known people who actually knew Jesus during Jesus' short life, but Paul never spoke to Jesus. He may have spoken to Jesus' spiritual presence, but certainly not to the man himself while he walked the Earth.

And then, of course, some of the books of the Old Testament are clearly simply literature, good literature maybe, but just good stories. The Song of Solomon????

Here is Wikipedia on the history of the Bible. Prior to the printing press, manuscripts were copied by hand and, of course, subject to potential alterations with each copy.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Bible_and_history

Few Americans read Hebrew or Greek. We generally don't even read Latin. I would bet that Joe the Plumber reads one of the English versions of the Bible: King James Bible, New Revised Standard or one of the others. Special revisions for those of us who read the Bible in English.

JHB

(37,161 posts)
56. Would that be "paraphrased bibles"?
Thu Jun 21, 2012, 07:08 AM
Jun 2012

Ones which take "inspired" (but old) translations like the KJV and "paraphrase" (don't say translate!) them into "contemporary English".

Because that's holy and revealed by God, not like the people go back to the oldest writings they can and "find something new". They obviously have an agenda, because catering to modern perceptions is the devil's work. And paraphrasing isn't catering. Really.

sarge43

(28,941 posts)
51. The bible starts with a revision.
Thu Jun 21, 2012, 06:01 AM
Jun 2012

The two versions of creation -- the order in which creation took place and the creation of humanity. Was man and woman created together in god's image or was woman created from man's rib?

sarge43

(28,941 posts)
188. The "When you were born, the doc slapped your mother, right?" look.
Fri Jun 22, 2012, 12:45 PM
Jun 2012

Tommy Lee has it down to an art form.

pokerfan

(27,677 posts)
159. That's a good point
Thu Jun 21, 2012, 08:35 PM
Jun 2012
Now I was happy to see that the Old Testament starts out with two conflicting stories about the origin of the universe: one where Adam and Eve are created at the exact same moment. And then a second creation story in chapter two, where Adam is created first and then Eve is created out of his rib after he gets lonely. And I thought, "Wow! For all those people who believe in the inerrancy of the Bible, or that every single word of the Bible is true, I mean, they can't even have read the first two chapters of the Bible." - Julia Sweeney, Letting Go of God

sarge43

(28,941 posts)
189. At least before running mouth about it, minimum read the first couple of chapters of that book. n/t
Fri Jun 22, 2012, 12:47 PM
Jun 2012
 

clang1

(884 posts)
6. re: Ignorance and stupidity, all personified in one man
Thu Jun 21, 2012, 12:46 AM
Jun 2012

Our country is fucking infested with Snake Oil salesmen. At all levels of society.

sarisataka

(18,663 posts)
21. I know I had a tough time
Thu Jun 21, 2012, 01:05 AM
Jun 2012

Learning all those languages so I could read the original texts.
I don't believe in the Ten Commandments yet but I have some good leads on the Ark of the Covenant...

Warren DeMontague

(80,708 posts)
49. Dude wasn't even an actual plumber, though
Thu Jun 21, 2012, 05:27 AM
Jun 2012

And little wonder. Prayer isn't going to get the shit out of a clogged drainpipe.

mindwalker_i

(4,407 posts)
17. Thing is, he probably knows how stupid that is
Thu Jun 21, 2012, 01:00 AM
Jun 2012

He knows his target audience, just like Rush and a lot of Republicans. They know they're full of shit, but their followers believe it. the importance of truth, accuracy, and logic depend on what one's goals are. When people don't pay attention to those and want their leaders to say things that reinforce the people's ideologies, truth, accuracy, and logic are actually bad things.

 

clang1

(884 posts)
20. re: Thing is, he probably knows how stupid that is
Thu Jun 21, 2012, 01:05 AM
Jun 2012

Ding ding ding. Hell yes they know they spout nothing but filth and drivel.

appleannie1

(5,067 posts)
22. It has been revised countless times. Where the heck has he been? Every generation revises
Thu Jun 21, 2012, 01:06 AM
Jun 2012

the Bible to make it "easier" to read. That is why the meanings have been changed to fit what people people believe in whatever time frame they live.

Angry Dragon

(36,693 posts)
25. I do believe the republicans have a contest to find
Thu Jun 21, 2012, 01:25 AM
Jun 2012

the biggest idiot in the country

Joe is in the running

LuckyLib

(6,819 posts)
146. It's such a massive contest it will be difficult to determine a winner.
Thu Jun 21, 2012, 05:29 PM
Jun 2012

Entrants from every corner of the country.

 

Marr

(20,317 posts)
26. And the moon is more important than the sun because
Thu Jun 21, 2012, 01:26 AM
Jun 2012

it gives us light at night, when it would be dark otherwise. The sun only shines during the day, when the world is already well-lit.

 

Scootaloo

(25,699 posts)
28. "Explains how his pastor..."
Thu Jun 21, 2012, 01:27 AM
Jun 2012

If i wanted Jobless Joe's pastor's opinion, I would ask him for it.

Come to think about it, I didn't ask for Jobless Joe's opinion, either; why am I receiving it?

KansDem

(28,498 posts)
84. Funny how they just keep shoveling this shit at us
Thu Jun 21, 2012, 11:05 AM
Jun 2012

One of their resident wuckfits makes an inane comment and it's all over the news for days. It's like they just sit and utter some nonsense, then the media goes apeshit and it becomes "news."

Then when that "story" dies down, another wuckfit makes another stupid remark and the pattern is repeated...over and over.

I suppose the question is, "How does one become a resident wuckfit and make big bucks?"

wordpix

(18,652 posts)
100. religion, pro-life, etc. are all a smokescreen to get the real agenda through: corporatocracy
Thu Jun 21, 2012, 11:55 AM
Jun 2012

with unlimited guns to protect them.

The repukes are very good at hiding their real agenda and even get the poor to join them, riling them up with anti-health care, anti-gay marriage, anti-abortion & contraceptives, family values rhetoric.

Actually, I think many repug leaders are gay - McConnell, Lindsay Graham, Jeff Sessions, David Dreier all come to mind, so why is the party so against gay marriage? And how many repugs have helped their girlfriends get abortions? I'm guessing quite a few. So all these issues are sideshows to detract from the main event: corporate takeover of US without restrictions or regulations, and with a sea of guns in the hands of those who are easily manipulated.

 

Scootaloo

(25,699 posts)
135. Actually, very limited guns
Thu Jun 21, 2012, 03:20 PM
Jun 2012

Here's a funny fact about the 2nd amendment.

It's the only portion of the bill of rights that is largely unavailable to the poor - except in so much that an aggressively-wielded bottle of Worcestershire sauce could count as "arms."

How do you think Republicans would vote on a bill that would provide a gun and standard training to any comer, in a manner similar to Switzerland's policy?

Downtown Hound

(12,618 posts)
29. Hey, Joe the Plumber
Thu Jun 21, 2012, 01:31 AM
Jun 2012

There's a big piece of shit where your brain is supposed to be that's clogging up your whole system. Be a good plumber and clean it out.

TrogL

(32,822 posts)
120. That's actually One of the better translations
Thu Jun 21, 2012, 01:35 PM
Jun 2012

His lot prefer the New Interational Version. Note "new" and "version". It's not pretty.

agent46

(1,262 posts)
34. I'm convinced this isn't stupidity
Thu Jun 21, 2012, 01:42 AM
Jun 2012

It is seriously an alternate reality. This is America now. Which means we're on our own.

Think I'll have another beer.

MindMover

(5,016 posts)
35. Make mine an Orval.....
Thu Jun 21, 2012, 01:56 AM
Jun 2012



The bible or holy bible has been translated, revised, and interpreted hundreds of times, if not thousands....and there really is not a complete bible today because of all the redaction's, revisions, and other changes made over the centuries....

and I should know, I went to bible school in college......

HeiressofBickworth

(2,682 posts)
40. It is abundantly obvious
Thu Jun 21, 2012, 02:53 AM
Jun 2012

that HIS pastor got his "degree" from one of those mail-in colleges for he apparently doesn't know the history of the very book he is using to instruct his flock. It is once again a fascinating thing to behold how the righties can use each side of their brain to come to very different conclusions that bear no resemblance to facts. I never went to bible school, I'm not even a christian and I know more about the bible than some of these brain-dead idiots.

agent46

(1,262 posts)
45. All we really have now
Thu Jun 21, 2012, 03:46 AM
Jun 2012

is the "idea" of the bible. Nobody actually reads it anymore, let alone studies it like you did. Makes it so much easier to use for political purposes.

Maybe in some twisted way, we deserve Joe the Plumber.

BlueMTexpat

(15,369 posts)
38. This is another issue that I have with John McCain.
Thu Jun 21, 2012, 02:37 AM
Jun 2012

Not content with foisting Palin upon us, he initiated this idiot's seemingly endless 15 minutes of infamy.

LeftishBrit

(41,208 posts)
39. The Holy Bible has never been revised?
Thu Jun 21, 2012, 02:50 AM
Jun 2012

So I suppose Joe the Plumber only reads the earliest available versions? Wow. I didn't know he could read both Hebrew and Greek!

ananda

(28,866 posts)
44. Ermm...
Thu Jun 21, 2012, 03:44 AM
Jun 2012

Revision is a good thing. It's how we correct mistakes.

That's why many scientific observations are called theories and not cemented facts, because the theory changes as new information becomes available.

Also, it's true that religion and its sacred texts is more fluid than concrete as well, changing many times over history. Not only that, but even that same religion takes on varying ideas and contexts depending on the time and the region. Take, for example, the Gnostic Gospels and varous sects that have a distinct eastern influence.

I often think that a good way to read sacred texts is to think of them as fiction in content and truth in wisdom as the reader takes it through his or her own mind and independent critical thinking and life experience. They have never been intended to serve as science texts, not then, not now.. but rather as a means to come at deep spiritual truths that can serve us in our own journeys toward enlightenment and evolution.

tex-wyo-dem

(3,190 posts)
171. Good analysis...
Thu Jun 21, 2012, 11:34 PM
Jun 2012

I absolutely agree with you.

The problem with many sects of modern Christianity as well as other religions is that their sacred texts are presented as literal facts (the absolute word of god that needs no interpretation) rather than fables rich in metaphor and anecdote that reqires the reader to think between the lines to truly get it.

The Bible has been translated and revised so many times over the history of its existence that it's difficult to say how much was lost in translation (either accidentally or purposefully) from the original texts. Not to mention parts that were just conveniently left out.

wandy

(3,539 posts)
47. In right wing reality, when you are told to believe that god dictated.....
Thu Jun 21, 2012, 04:19 AM
Jun 2012

every word in the bible to hair cloth clothed monks, you will then want to believe that god dictated every word in the bible to hair cloth clothed monks.
And by these words it will be so.
Add the fact that science sometimes becomes a bit inconvenient and then naturally the bible is more accurate than science books because it’s never been revised.

Mark my words. At some point in time some great right wing leader will proclaimer that gravity is as false as global warming.
All of reality will change and we will begin to see religious right wing wackos jumping off roofs in an attempt to 'ascend'.

My my; do you think we could get Al Gore to give some talks about the dangers of gravity?

sakabatou

(42,158 posts)
48. *bashes head in*
Thu Jun 21, 2012, 04:30 AM
Jun 2012

Then please, Joe, explain the diversity of versions? Also, you have no fucking clue about how science works.

KG

(28,751 posts)
50. too stupid to see the science they don't believe in has basically created the modern world in which
Thu Jun 21, 2012, 05:27 AM
Jun 2012

they live...

justiceischeap

(14,040 posts)
52. 1973 was the first year the word "Homosexual" appeared in the bible
Thu Jun 21, 2012, 06:04 AM
Jun 2012

not the King James version but the New International version. The reason I note this is because the original texts didn't actually have a word for homosexuality and repubs like to use the bible as a tool against my people. It's also a factual (I know, pesky little things repubs like to ignore) accounting of a revision.

I know repubs hate to be educated--they think it's all elitist and such--but according to the dictionary (pick your own version) this is the meaning of version:

A particular form of something differing in certain respects from an earlier form or other forms of the same type of thing.

JHB

(37,161 posts)
54. Awww, lay off Comrade Joe, the Model Soviet Citizen
Thu Jun 21, 2012, 06:48 AM
Jun 2012

If a book does not say it was revised then it was never revised. Only a running dog out to destroy our beloved homeland would suggest otherwise.

Is obvious, nyet?

lunatica

(53,410 posts)
55. Stupid has worked really well for Joe The Plumber
Thu Jun 21, 2012, 06:57 AM
Jun 2012

It must be work to come up with something so stupid that it out-stupids your last stupidity depths.

Skinner

(63,645 posts)
57. The amazing thing is that he nailed the important difference...
Thu Jun 21, 2012, 07:18 AM
Jun 2012

...but came to precisely the wrong conclusion.

CBHagman

(16,986 posts)
59. It's hard to decide what they're most ignorant of...
Thu Jun 21, 2012, 07:32 AM
Jun 2012

...history, language, theology, church politics.

Lucy Goosey

(2,940 posts)
187. And don't forget science!
Fri Jun 22, 2012, 11:27 AM
Jun 2012

They're ignorant of that, too - not just of the specifics of various scientific theories/facts/phenomena, etc., but they don't really seem to know what science itself or the scientific method are.

Island Blue

(5,817 posts)
62. By that logic we should all be crapping
Thu Jun 21, 2012, 07:55 AM
Jun 2012

in a hole in the back yard and Joe should be out of work. There is some science involved in the modern toilet.

deutsey

(20,166 posts)
65. He's a political scientist who offers insightful analyses of socialism AND he's a biblical scholar
Thu Jun 21, 2012, 08:15 AM
Jun 2012

A real Renaissance man, he is.

Ikonoklast

(23,973 posts)
186. He's been plumbing the depths of dumbass ever since we were made aware of his existence.
Fri Jun 22, 2012, 11:16 AM
Jun 2012

The problem is, there is a bottomless pit of dumbass and Joe the Fake Plumber keeps mining it.

Arkana

(24,347 posts)
68. Is this idiot still flapping his yapper?
Thu Jun 21, 2012, 08:53 AM
Jun 2012

Someone needs to tell ol' Joe that the timer ran out on his 15 minutes 4 years ago.

sinkingfeeling

(51,460 posts)
69. That's right Joe, your Bible is written on the original papyrus in
Thu Jun 21, 2012, 09:56 AM
Jun 2012

Hebrew, Aramaic, and Greek. It's never been touched by any human hand.

rustydog

(9,186 posts)
80. Dear Gawd, does this man know how poorly he reflects plumbers?
Thu Jun 21, 2012, 10:20 AM
Jun 2012

Is this not a form of taking the Lord's name in vain? It isn't just cursing, right?

jwirr

(39,215 posts)
82. Never revised? There are dozens of versions and they do not all use the same meanings. He is an
Thu Jun 21, 2012, 10:53 AM
Jun 2012

idiot.

CJCRANE

(18,184 posts)
88. Tide goes in, tide goes out.
Thu Jun 21, 2012, 11:25 AM
Jun 2012

Never a miscommunication.

You can't explain that. You can't explain why the tide goes in.

Hugabear

(10,340 posts)
90. What language is Joe the Plumber's Bible written in?
Thu Jun 21, 2012, 11:27 AM
Jun 2012

Unless it's in the original language, then it's been revised.

tclambert

(11,087 posts)
152. Pretty sure God speaks Old Gallifreyan.
Thu Jun 21, 2012, 06:38 PM
Jun 2012
http://www.google.com/imgres?q=old+high+gallifreyan+alphabet&hl=en&sa=X&rlz=1C1GGGE_enUS399&biw=1333&bih=674&tbm=isch&prmd=imvns&tbnid=DqhYc4m4vlZgNM:&imgrefurl=http://tardis.wikia.com/wiki/Gallifreyan_(language)&docid=rk8JK-Uw0IiT3M&imgurl=&w=946&h=532&ei=Q6TjT_6kF4jA8ASS1ezcCQ&zoom=1&iact=hc&vpx=525&vpy=169&dur=3354&hovh=168&hovw=300&tx=117&ty=101&sig=102739390597699280829&page=1&tbnh=116&tbnw=207&start=0&ndsp=19&ved=1t:429,r:2,s:0,i:80

wordpix

(18,652 posts)
93. Stupid should explain: Bible More Accurate Than the Constitution Because It’s Never Been Revised
Thu Jun 21, 2012, 11:43 AM
Jun 2012

Maybe he'll pause for brief thinking on that one.

Odin2005

(53,521 posts)
94. Sam the Moron just proved my hypothesis for why these morons hate science.
Thu Jun 21, 2012, 11:43 AM
Jun 2012

They are unable to comprehend that all scientific knowledge is provisional and subject to falsification. A science-based worldview in incompatible with the notion of "Absolute Truth", and Authoritarian personalities need "Absolute Truth".

Liberalman777

(35 posts)
98. Joe needs to Watch the History Channel and It's Shows about the Bible
Thu Jun 21, 2012, 11:50 AM
Jun 2012

They show where and when the Bible was revised..Things Like When the concept of Hell originally was a temporary state and then over the centuries was "Made" Permanent . Hell wasn't even in the original Bible and not placed there until the 2nd century.

 

Suji to Seoul

(2,035 posts)
99. He said, ‘see any revisions on it Joe’? I said, ‘no.’
Thu Jun 21, 2012, 11:51 AM
Jun 2012

I guess that New Testament is just a work-in-progress, right, Joey!?!?!

Fuckstick!

 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
108. Err, don't know what to do with this one
Thu Jun 21, 2012, 12:25 PM
Jun 2012

laugh, cry... what.

JOE, here is a little thing you obviously do not know... not only has it been revised, not once, not twice, but several times.

Oy vey shmeer!

JonLP24

(29,322 posts)
109. OMG
Thu Jun 21, 2012, 12:26 PM
Jun 2012

The fact that science is constantly changing indicates it is accurate. What he is saying if science stuck to it's original theories that would prove science is accurate.

whopis01

(3,514 posts)
111. If the bible had problems at the end of each chapter, the publishers would revise it every year
Thu Jun 21, 2012, 12:38 PM
Jun 2012

just so you had to keep buying new ones so that you could do your homework assignments properly.

Crowman1979

(3,844 posts)
112. What the...been hundreds of...where the.........?!?!?!?
Thu Jun 21, 2012, 12:44 PM
Jun 2012

AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH!!!!!!!!!!!

librechik

(30,674 posts)
115. I really mourn for the average knowledge bank of Americans
Thu Jun 21, 2012, 12:47 PM
Jun 2012

the lack of education is serving the Republicans who advocate it very well.

 

sulphurdunn

(6,891 posts)
116. Demagogues
Thu Jun 21, 2012, 12:59 PM
Jun 2012

from Adolf Hitler to Henry Kissinger have made it clear that for most people their perception of what is true is far more important than what actually is true.

muriel_volestrangler

(101,321 posts)
118. Imagine you're Steve Kraus, and you lost a primary to this idiot
Thu Jun 21, 2012, 01:25 PM
Jun 2012

How fucking low must your self-esteem be now? How much must you feel that your fellow Republicans despise you, that they'd choose a moron over you as their candidate?

 

Taverner

(55,476 posts)
127. Problem is we don't have the wingnuts in cages
Thu Jun 21, 2012, 01:52 PM
Jun 2012

So they can't hurt anyone

I'm all for locking wingnuts in cages!!!!

 

Taverner

(55,476 posts)
126. Um, the bible has been revised COUNTLESS times!
Thu Jun 21, 2012, 01:51 PM
Jun 2012

And - fuck - I can't even argue with this kind of stupid

MineralMan

(146,317 posts)
131. But wait...I have a Revised Standard Version
Thu Jun 21, 2012, 02:29 PM
Jun 2012

of The Bible, right next to my King James version and two books away from my Jefferson Bible.

Hasn't been revised, eh? You betcha, Joe!

neeksgeek

(1,214 posts)
133. Oh, please!
Thu Jun 21, 2012, 02:55 PM
Jun 2012

The Bible has most certainly been revised. There are many versions (go into any secular bookstore and compare them). There are books that were left out. It's been translated into God knows how many languages. To claim that it is unchanged from the time of the original stories is just ignorant, whether you believe that it is ultimately "God's Word" or just a book.

Jesus and his disciples did not go around the Holy Land carrying copies of the New International Version!

Scientists revise existing writings when new information comes to light. Religious zealots would rather ban books and place original thinkers under house arrest (if they're lucky). See Galileo.

backscatter712

(26,355 posts)
139. Just on my Nook or on my bookshelf, I count four separate versions of the Bible.
Thu Jun 21, 2012, 04:46 PM
Jun 2012

I have a copy of the King James version, the New International Version, the NET Bible and the New Revised Standard Version.

That's just in my personal possession. There are hundreds of versions of the Bible, just in English.

PatrynXX

(5,668 posts)
142. it's called faith but Joe decided
Thu Jun 21, 2012, 05:04 PM
Jun 2012

he's stupid. so depending on which version of the bible your reading.... let alone the new book is a revised version of the bible and that um that word shows up in certain version of the bible that guy would not be on any team fighting for the bible. he'd drop the ball a long ways back. (what is RSV??? ) go ahead joe say it??? personally I prefer the KJV not the NKJV

Most Lutherans use the NIV.

hamsterjill

(15,222 posts)
144. Probably old news, but I just saw a bumper sticker
Thu Jun 21, 2012, 05:21 PM
Jun 2012

I'd not seen the bumper sticker before, and I just had to laugh. It read:

Joe-the-Plumber
Meet
Barack-the-President


tclambert

(11,087 posts)
154. The reason science is more accurate is precisely because it's been revised so many times.
Thu Jun 21, 2012, 06:58 PM
Jun 2012

The bible says the Sun goes around the Earth. And it says the value of Pi is 3.0 even. Can't fix it, 'cause they won't revise it.

Science used to say our galaxy was the only one. Then we found out some of those fuzzy patches in the sky were more galaxies. Update the books!

Science becomes more accurate through the process of stepwise refinement. Einstein's theory of gravity didn't refute nor replace Newton's. It added another level of precision.

pokerfan

(27,677 posts)
160. Reminds me of an essay by Isaac Asimov
Thu Jun 21, 2012, 08:41 PM
Jun 2012
My answer to him was, "John, when people thought the earth was flat, they were wrong. When people thought the earth was spherical, they were wrong. But if you think that thinking the earth is spherical is just as wrong as thinking the earth is flat, then your view is wronger than both of them put together."

The basic trouble, you see, is that people think that "right" and "wrong" are absolute; that everything that isn't perfectly and completely right is totally and equally wrong.

However, I don't think that's so. It seems to me that right and wrong are fuzzy concepts, and I will devote this essay to an explanation of why I think so.

The Relativity of Wrong

barbtries

(28,799 posts)
162. he really is stupid, isn't he?
Thu Jun 21, 2012, 10:48 PM
Jun 2012

did i hear that he's running for public office? hope his would be constituents are running in the opposite direction.

 

clang1

(884 posts)
176. re: hope his would be constituents are running in the opposite direction.
Fri Jun 22, 2012, 01:32 AM
Jun 2012

No. These are the type people that get elected to office in the climate in which we currently live.

 

Jerry Frey

(32 posts)
164. learn something new
Thu Jun 21, 2012, 11:13 PM
Jun 2012

The Bible is not the verbally inspired inerrant word of God. It was "revised" when the Epistle of Barnabas was removed and the Gospel of Peter was excluded. For POSITIVE Facts about Christianity, pls visit:

http://napoleonlive.info/judas-the-galilean/

Wurzelbacher is a dim bulb, lost like an atheist.

southerncrone

(5,506 posts)
177. And these stupid-ass MFers are running our lives!
Fri Jun 22, 2012, 02:07 AM
Jun 2012

PLEEEEEASE....let's institute a literacy/aptitude test to get a voter's registration!

And this ignoramus is running for US Congress. America drowns in a sea of stupidity......

Clouseau2

(60 posts)
179. If ...
Fri Jun 22, 2012, 02:44 AM
Jun 2012

If you took Sarah Palin and gave her a sex change and a lobotomy, you'd end up with Joe the Plumber.

jonthebru

(1,034 posts)
180. To quote the great English poet George Harrison
Fri Jun 22, 2012, 02:55 AM
Jun 2012

"Think for yourself because I won't be there with you."
This guy is a professional publicity seeker. Like the guy who wins hot dog eating contests...

truth2power

(8,219 posts)
184. God Almighty!!! (You should excuse the expression)....
Fri Jun 22, 2012, 09:43 AM
Jun 2012
Revised Standard Version, anyone? There are just no words.

I used to be a member of a UU church (long story about that).

One time, a member of the UUA spoke at one of our services. She said:

God is one;
God is love;
And revelation is not sealed. (Uh...this last is a good thing as far as UU's are concerned.)

p.s. Great graphic, pokerfan.

Tsiyu

(18,186 posts)
185. Wow. He must be a lousy plumber
Fri Jun 22, 2012, 10:57 AM
Jun 2012


No reading about modern plumbing techniques for Joe! Blasphemy!

All he can do is dig latrines and cisterns and pray over your problem.

No science. No siree. Jesus didn't have a toilet and he turned out great!




lpbk2713

(42,759 posts)
191. He's going for ALL the dog whistles.
Mon Jun 25, 2012, 10:36 AM
Jun 2012



Isn't there a hymn that goes ... "Bringing in the sheep, bringing in the sheep" ?

Joe the Dumber, he's a laff riot.


Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Joe the Plumber: Bible Mo...