Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

oberliner

(58,724 posts)
Wed Dec 14, 2016, 12:33 PM Dec 2016

Obama's Red Line, Revisited

On the last Saturday of August 2013, Labor Day weekend, the United States was once again about to go to war in the Middle East.

Less than two weeks earlier, in the middle of the night on August 21, the Syrian military had attacked rebel-controlled areas of the Damascus suburbs with chemical weapons, killing nearly 1,500 civilians, including more than 400 children. Horrific video footage showing people with twisted bodies sprawled on hospital floors, some twitching and foaming at the mouth after being exposed to sarin gas, had ricocheted around the world. This brazen assault had clearly crossed the “red line” that President Barack Obama had enunciated a year earlier—that if Assad used chemical weapons, it would warrant U.S. military action.

Heading into the long weekend, the Pentagon had made plans for round-the-clock staffing, since we thought the military operation would start over the holiday. As the assistant secretary of defense for international security affairs, I had been involved in the deliberations and planning for the strikes. Yet early Saturday morning, I received a call from Secretary of Defense Chuck Hagel’s office with surprising news: The president had called Hagel late the night before and told him he “wanted to explore another option.” Instead of ordering strikes immediately, the president wanted to pump the brakes and first go to Congress to ask for its authorization.

So when the president stepped into the sunny Rose Garden that Saturday morning, he announced that he had made two decisions: first, that the U.S. should act against Syria, and second, that he would seek explicit authorization from Congress to do so. With that, the administration set out on a different campaign than the military one we had been preparing for: to convince the American people that intervening in Syria was in the country’s interest.

http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2016/07/obama-syria-foreign-policy-red-line-revisited-214059


Really fascinating read for those following the current situation in Syria closely.
1 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Obama's Red Line, Revisited (Original Post) oberliner Dec 2016 OP
And Putin won the day Wellstone ruled Dec 2016 #1
 

Wellstone ruled

(34,661 posts)
1. And Putin won the day
Wed Dec 14, 2016, 01:57 PM
Dec 2016

by going all in for Assad,then going all in to change the Government of the USA via a Cyber Intrusion. And the persons responsibly for catching this Intrusion decided to chose sides with the Corporation's. Again,McConnell and Ryan played their Party's Interests over the Interests of our Country. We are now the United States of Rosneuff.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Obama's Red Line, Revisit...