Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsEric Trump Charity Spent $880K at Family-Owned Golf Resorts
Worth a repost in light of Ivanka's fundraiser "coffee" auction to benefit this "charity"
In promotional videos and press releases, ETF touts a 95 to 100 percent donation ratio and implies that by benefit of being a Trump, namesake properties are handed over for charity events at little or no cost. But according to a Daily Beast analysis of annual IRS reports and New York state financial disclosures from the charitys inception in 2007 to 2014, the most recent year for which data is available, ETF spent $881,779 on its annual Golf Invitational at Trump-owned clubs, a portion of which$100,000 in 2013 and $88,000 in 2014was reported as paid directly to a company of a family member of the Board of Directors. In other words, Donald Trump himself.
Theres nothing necessarily wrong with contracting with businesses you own, said Philip Hackney, an associate professor of law at Louisiana State Universitys Paul M. Hebert Law Center, and a former employee in the IRSs Exempt Organizations unit.
It becomes problematic, Hackney said, when a charity claims to send 100 percent of donations to an intended beneficiary, but routes some of that money through their own business without fully disclosing that fact to donors.
Theres a questionmaybe not of the legality, but of the ethics of it, he said.
Theres nothing necessarily wrong with contracting with businesses you own, said Philip Hackney, an associate professor of law at Louisiana State Universitys Paul M. Hebert Law Center, and a former employee in the IRSs Exempt Organizations unit.
It becomes problematic, Hackney said, when a charity claims to send 100 percent of donations to an intended beneficiary, but routes some of that money through their own business without fully disclosing that fact to donors.
Theres a questionmaybe not of the legality, but of the ethics of it, he said.
http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2016/09/30/eric-trump-charity-spent-880k-at-family-owned-golf-resorts.html
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
3 replies, 583 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (7)
ReplyReply to this post
3 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Eric Trump Charity Spent $880K at Family-Owned Golf Resorts (Original Post)
ehrnst
Dec 2016
OP
BSdetect
(8,998 posts)1. Ethics can just be brushed aside in drumphland
Freethinker65
(10,036 posts)2. Just wait for tax payer bills for State dinners at Mar a Lago
Coyotl
(15,262 posts)3. When Trump stays in his resorts, will he bill the USG for the tab?
Don't be too surprised!