Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsRolling Stone: What Part of 'Austerity Isn't Working' Don't People Get?
What Part of 'Austerity Isn't Working' Don't People Get?
POSTED: June 18, 1:25 PM ET | By Jared Bernstein
As I prepared for a talk on austerity last week, I found myself a bit stuck. What can you say other than that its very clearly not working, nor should we expect it to, nor has it ever? And then I hit upon what I think is the key question: Why do governments stick with the austerity approach when all the evidence suggests it's a total failure?
First, some facts. By austerity I mean attacking recession by cutting spending and raising taxes the opposite of Keynesianism, which dictates that if the private sector isn't spending enough money to get the economy moving, the government needs to temporarily step in and supply the juice (aka "stimulus" . Europe and the UK are committed to austerity, and not coincidentally they've seen growth deteriorate and unemployment jump (to over 20 percent in Greece and Spain). The figure below, from this excellent and pretty readable paper by economist Jay Shambaugh reveals the expected positive correlation between governments that cut spending and slower GDP growth.
Too bad for Europe, right? But, wait were doing the austerity thing too, cutting spending as stimulus fades and failing to enact jobs measures, such as fiscal relief to cash-strapped state and local governments or public infrastructure investment measures that appear more necessary with each new, disappointing economic report.
In a way, our austerity policies are actually less defensible than those in some European countries. With the price of borrowing so extremely low here, capital markets are basically pleading for our government to borrow and get busy with temporary growth measures. Thats not happening in Spain, Italy, Portugal, and Greece, and for good reason: government debt in those countries is highly risky, and priced accordingly. ..............(more)
The complete piece is at: http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/blogs/national-affairs/what-part-of-austerity-isnt-working-dont-people-get-20120617#ixzz1yNu8lGXW
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
2 replies, 848 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (3)
ReplyReply to this post
2 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Rolling Stone: What Part of 'Austerity Isn't Working' Don't People Get? (Original Post)
marmar
Jun 2012
OP
Warpy
(111,277 posts)1. People angry about the bad economy want to punish
other people they see as spongers. That's one reason it's popular, same reason Reagan's "welfare queen" horseshit sold well to morons.
Unfortunately, austerity doesn't work because every dime taken away from a "sponger" is one subtracted from the larger economy, an economy that has been on life support for decades.
The model to follow is Iceland's. They nationalized the banks, jailed the bastards who caused the crash, and kept their social programs intact. They are in recovery. Spain, Italy, Portugal and Greece are not.
KansDem
(28,498 posts)2. "Trickle Down" hasn't worked either...
It's been over 30 years and the Reagan tax cuts didn't do a damn thing they were supposed to do.
Add to that the Bush tax cuts.
But the Repubs still claim tax cuts create jobs...