Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

marmar

(77,081 posts)
Wed Jun 20, 2012, 08:52 PM Jun 2012

Rolling Stone: What Part of 'Austerity Isn't Working' Don't People Get?



What Part of 'Austerity Isn't Working' Don't People Get?
POSTED: June 18, 1:25 PM ET | By Jared Bernstein


As I prepared for a talk on austerity last week, I found myself a bit stuck. What can you say other than that it’s very clearly not working, nor should we expect it to, nor has it ever? And then I hit upon what I think is the key question: Why do governments stick with the austerity approach when all the evidence suggests it's a total failure?

First, some facts. By austerity I mean attacking recession by cutting spending and raising taxes – the opposite of Keynesianism, which dictates that if the private sector isn't spending enough money to get the economy moving, the government needs to temporarily step in and supply the juice (aka "stimulus&quot . Europe and the UK are committed to austerity, and – not coincidentally – they've seen growth deteriorate and unemployment jump (to over 20 percent in Greece and Spain). The figure below, from this excellent – and pretty readable – paper by economist Jay Shambaugh reveals the expected positive correlation between governments that cut spending and slower GDP growth.

Too bad for Europe, right? But, wait – we’re doing the austerity thing too, cutting spending as stimulus fades and failing to enact jobs measures, such as fiscal relief to cash-strapped state and local governments or public infrastructure investment – measures that appear more necessary with each new, disappointing economic report.

In a way, our austerity policies are actually less defensible than those in some European countries. With the price of borrowing so extremely low here, capital markets are basically pleading for our government to borrow and get busy with temporary growth measures. That’s not happening in Spain, Italy, Portugal, and Greece, and for good reason: government debt in those countries is highly risky, and priced accordingly. ..............(more)

The complete piece is at: http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/blogs/national-affairs/what-part-of-austerity-isnt-working-dont-people-get-20120617#ixzz1yNu8lGXW




2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Rolling Stone: What Part of 'Austerity Isn't Working' Don't People Get? (Original Post) marmar Jun 2012 OP
People angry about the bad economy want to punish Warpy Jun 2012 #1
"Trickle Down" hasn't worked either... KansDem Jun 2012 #2

Warpy

(111,277 posts)
1. People angry about the bad economy want to punish
Wed Jun 20, 2012, 08:57 PM
Jun 2012

other people they see as spongers. That's one reason it's popular, same reason Reagan's "welfare queen" horseshit sold well to morons.

Unfortunately, austerity doesn't work because every dime taken away from a "sponger" is one subtracted from the larger economy, an economy that has been on life support for decades.

The model to follow is Iceland's. They nationalized the banks, jailed the bastards who caused the crash, and kept their social programs intact. They are in recovery. Spain, Italy, Portugal and Greece are not.

KansDem

(28,498 posts)
2. "Trickle Down" hasn't worked either...
Wed Jun 20, 2012, 09:22 PM
Jun 2012

It's been over 30 years and the Reagan tax cuts didn't do a damn thing they were supposed to do.

Add to that the Bush tax cuts.

But the Repubs still claim tax cuts create jobs...

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Rolling Stone: What Part ...