Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

ProSense

(116,464 posts)
Wed Jun 20, 2012, 11:15 AM Jun 2012

Mitt Romney still trying to take credit for Obama's auto rescue, claiming he would have done better

Mitt Romney still trying to take credit for Obama's auto rescue, claiming he would have done better

by Laura Clawson

Mitt Romney campaigned in Michigan Tuesday, which inevitably means he made a fresh round of fraudulent claims about President Obama's auto rescue and the wisdom of Mitt Romney's suggestions thereon:

My policy had the same objective as the people in Detroit: I wanted to see the auto industry thrive and grow, and felt it needed a managed bankruptcy to be able to do so. It took the president a little longer to come around to that way of thinking," Romney told WOOD TV8, according to a portion of the interview the network previewed. "He ultimately took the auto industry through bankruptcy. They went through that process. And now, with support they have received from government and the American people, they have come back strong. That's a good thing. I would have done it faster than he did and saved us about $20 billion."

This is the problem when Mitt Romney is relatively consistent: It is so wearisome to have to list, again and again, the ways he is shamelessly distorting the facts. Here we have his tale of himself as a prophet, ignored at first but then heeded, only to have his prophecy denied by those who benefited from it. This is, of course, false.

Romney continues to insist that the auto companies should have been put into managed bankruptcy at a moment when that was impossible, when bankruptcy would have meant liquidation. There was no private money available for a managed bankruptcy; the only way to keep GM and Chrysler open was government money, and the alternative was, yes, liquidation. There are only so many ways to say this, but it has been said by sources as varied as the Bush administration, the Obama administration, Chrysler's bankruptcy judge, and independent economists from both parties.

But Romney is not interested in the facts. He's banking on not being called out on his lies consistently enough to make lying a losing strategy. Claiming credit for the managed bankruptcy that happened months, and one bailout, after his at-the-time-impossible call for managed bankruptcy is a winner for Mitt Romney as long as, I don't know, maybe two out of three reporters let him get away with it. So, damn the facts, he's going with it. This should not be a hard one for reporters: if you're planning to ask Romney about the auto rescue, you know his talking points ahead of time, and the needed follow-up is not a mystery. Press him on this one.

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2012/06/20/1101573/-Mitt-Romney-still-trying-to-take-credit-for-Obama-s-auto-rescue-claiming-he-would-have-done-better


President Obama's rescue of the auto industry is a big problem for Republicans
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1002622822

7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Mitt Romney still trying to take credit for Obama's auto rescue, claiming he would have done better (Original Post) ProSense Jun 2012 OP
He would have made sure the top executives walked away with millions more. liberal N proud Jun 2012 #1
Romney saw the auto industry's failure merely as an opportunity JohnnyRingo Jun 2012 #2
Yeah - send the jobs to China. HopeHoops Jun 2012 #3
The idea of a managed bankrup. is not original to Romney. MichiganVote Jun 2012 #4
K & R Scurrilous Jun 2012 #5
The Chapter 11 would have failed under Romney aint_no_life_nowhere Jun 2012 #6
reality check ... napkinz Jun 2012 #7

liberal N proud

(60,340 posts)
1. He would have made sure the top executives walked away with millions more.
Wed Jun 20, 2012, 11:23 AM
Jun 2012

We need to look no further than his Bain Capital experience as an example of how he would have handled it.

JohnnyRingo

(18,640 posts)
2. Romney saw the auto industry's failure merely as an opportunity
Wed Jun 20, 2012, 11:43 AM
Jun 2012

..to strangle the UAW, and he was very upset that the Obama loan left it intact. At the time he and the Republican collective expressed their disgust with "Obama cronyism".

The president used the "managed bankruptcy" that Romney now speaks of. Mitt would have simply torn up the pre-existing contracts and started over from scratch. He claims private money was waiting in the wings to scoop up the ailing auto makers piecemeal, completely ignoring the fact that GM couldn't even find a legitimate buyer for the Hummer brand.

When Mitt was young, sitting in the back of the family station wagon shaking the endless failed doodles from his Etch-a-Sketch, he could have read on the back that it was made in the USA by Ohio Arts using a union labor force. That must have frustrated him immensely and left deep anti-union scars that haunt him to this day.

aint_no_life_nowhere

(21,925 posts)
6. The Chapter 11 would have failed under Romney
Wed Jun 20, 2012, 01:40 PM
Jun 2012

There would have been no reorganization possible and the plan to restructure debt and pay obligations as they came due would not have worked. The auto industry needed access to funds to do that and no private lenders were cooperating. Either the judge would never have allowed them into Chapter 11 or he would have decided the Chapter 11 reorganization had failed and he would have ordered them into a Chapter 7 liquidation of assets and corporate dissolution. Either way, we would not have GM if Romney had been at the helm.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Mitt Romney still trying ...