Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

ManyShadesOf

(639 posts)
Wed Jun 20, 2012, 01:13 AM Jun 2012

Porn Again

The real genius of using gender to divide and conquer is that it's timeless.



Right Wingnuts learned that long ago. It's still workin for em bigtime. Such that people are still calling themselves Republicans instead of fleeing the insanity; voting against their own best interests and even their own bodies and health.

Health is at stake here: physical, emotional, psychological, societal. It's all wrapped up together.

On this board, recent squabbles about discussing women's issues inevitably turn to issues of control, dominance and accusations of censorship.

Why? Why is being able to discuss women's rights and societal impacts on the lives of women automatically turned into a supposed affront to the rights of others?

Because they want to watch porn?

It's possible to chew gum and walk. Maybe it's possible to discuss societal impacts on gender issues AND also consider the huge can of worms that is pornography (or not even think about it).

Being pro-feminist, pro-woman, pro-healthy relationship/society is not automatically anti-male, anti-porn, anti-free speech. To pretend that it is, shuts down open discussion and serves the Right Wing agenda.

28 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Porn Again (Original Post) ManyShadesOf Jun 2012 OP
Thank you... whathehell Jun 2012 #1
you're welcome! ManyShadesOf Jun 2012 #2
I agree, but have you noticed that whathehell Jun 2012 #3
some men ManyShadesOf Jun 2012 #5
Some whathehell Jun 2012 #7
The tedium is the message. Warren DeMontague Jun 2012 #11
I noticed that. I think we do get it and I applaud those men who also get it. nt Mojorabbit Jun 2012 #19
I do as well. It's just that if you take a look at this thread whathehell Jun 2012 #20
As a woman, I know that issues of reproductive health are things one has to deal with tabatha Jun 2012 #4
great post ManyShadesOf Jun 2012 #6
worthy of its own thread Skittles Jun 2012 #10
Wonderful post. Thank you. n/t Autumn Jun 2012 #18
You are ignorant if you think porn is a men's only product joeglow3 Jun 2012 #23
Can we walk and chew gum at the same time? MLK and Ghandi think so! Warren DeMontague Jun 2012 #8
Then please ManyShadesOf Jun 2012 #14
talking to Warren DeMontague Jun 2012 #24
This ProudToBeBlueInRhody Jun 2012 #21
"Don't know why people are conflating the issues...." Warren DeMontague Jun 2012 #22
all right ManyShadesOf Jun 2012 #25
Why don't you direct me to the threads where "fans of porn"..... ProudToBeBlueInRhody Jun 2012 #26
Why don't you ManyShadesOf Jun 2012 #27
Is that it? ProudToBeBlueInRhody Jun 2012 #28
women's issues are secondary to the right to sport a boner Skittles Jun 2012 #9
Post removed Post removed Jun 2012 #12
The problem with porn quaker bill Jun 2012 #13
Agreed ManyShadesOf Jun 2012 #15
and many of us have a problem with it because of the degradation and dehumanizing of women seabeyond Jun 2012 #16
Attention! ManyShadesOf Jun 2012 #17

whathehell

(29,090 posts)
1. Thank you...
Wed Jun 20, 2012, 01:22 AM
Jun 2012

"Being pro-feminist, pro-woman, pro-healthy relationship/society is not automatically anti-male, anti-porn, anti-free speech"

Unfortunately, too many supposed "progressives" on this board are not even CLOSE to getting that.

 

ManyShadesOf

(639 posts)
5. some men
Wed Jun 20, 2012, 01:40 AM
Jun 2012

or more of them are speaking up. Two good quotes from tonight, which are in response to the porn threads but touch on broader issues.

Really disturbing porn
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1002831011
If we want to reduce the number of degrading spectacles around us, we need to take back our government from the Predator Class and create a new New Deal. We need living-wage jobs. As long as the 99% are held down by debt, austerity, and laws that give their money to the wealthiest, we will have very bad things happen. We must fight.

The Truth About Porn OP
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=826076
Well, guys - and yes, I mean that literally, guys - let me explain a few things about porn to you. Pornography is damaging. it's dehumanizing, it often revolves around violence and brutalization, it causes weird problems both in the bedroom and greater society, and it perpetuates all sorts of ugliness that we'd like to forget about.

whathehell

(29,090 posts)
7. Some
Wed Jun 20, 2012, 02:49 AM
Jun 2012

but still not enough. I do like the last link you provided

The first is a bit too "diffused" to be considered, IMO, a message on porn.

whathehell

(29,090 posts)
20. I do as well. It's just that if you take a look at this thread
Wed Jun 20, 2012, 01:33 PM
Jun 2012

I think you'll see that they are in the rank minority.

tabatha

(18,795 posts)
4. As a woman, I know that issues of reproductive health are things one has to deal with
Wed Jun 20, 2012, 01:38 AM
Jun 2012

from age 12/13 onward for decades. It is not funny. It is a hassle. Doctors visits are awful. Complications are even worse.

I know that dealing with men in everyday life, who for the most part, have just one thing on their minds especially for certain decades of life, is annoying, irritating and very often demeaning.

Thus the discussion of porn seems very superficial and quite frankly insensitive.

If a person likes porn, so be it. Just shut up about it.

There are porn watchers in restricted societies, and in free societies. So what. All it means is that men like porn no matter where they are born or live. The only thing that it evokes in men is the ability to do what they like most physically.

For women, it can evoke a lot of pain. Especially for those who have been raped - and there are many who have been.

 

ManyShadesOf

(639 posts)
6. great post
Wed Jun 20, 2012, 01:43 AM
Jun 2012

thank you tabatha.

Also, discussions of media depictions of women relate to that -- and not necessarily to discussion of PORN. Unless it's in someone's mind that they are the SAME THING. They're not.

Warren DeMontague

(80,708 posts)
8. Can we walk and chew gum at the same time? MLK and Ghandi think so!
Wed Jun 20, 2012, 02:56 AM
Jun 2012




Of course, the vast majority of people here are unapologetically for choice, just like the vast majority of people here don't think consenting adults watching other consenting adults have sex is a big deal. Certainly not worth the fights, the hand-wringing, the moaning and gnashing of teeth we periodically see over it.

And yet, the religious right, the Rick Santorums, want to do away with abortion, contraception, AND consenting adult porn.

Seems to me pretty cut and dried. It would take a lot of deliberate pot-stirring to muddle that sort of clarity.



ProudToBeBlueInRhody

(16,399 posts)
21. This
Wed Jun 20, 2012, 01:56 PM
Jun 2012

"And yet, the religious right, the Rick Santorums, want to do away with abortion, contraception, AND consenting adult porn."

This 1000 times this.

Don't know why people are conflating the issues......if someone is claiming that fans of porn HERE can't support women's rights, control over their OWN bodies, the right to say vagina in public, etc......then they can take a long walk off a short pier.

Warren DeMontague

(80,708 posts)
22. "Don't know why people are conflating the issues...."
Wed Jun 20, 2012, 02:00 PM
Jun 2012

Hmmm. Good question, I've got some ideas as to what the answer may be. Let me put it this way:









 

ManyShadesOf

(639 posts)
25. all right
Wed Jun 20, 2012, 03:20 PM
Jun 2012

that sounds good. So why can't some "fans of porn" be consistent in their "support women's rights, control over their OWN bodies, the right to say vagina in public, etc." and stop stalking/mocking/harassing women here who choose to discuss these matters? Such that they are blocked from Groups and resort to cherrypicking topics to drag back to their Groups for more stalking/mocking/harassing .. it's toxic behavior and not clear what the benefit to DU is.

and then there's http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=833736 (insert your own "short pier" joke here)

If they were consistent, all that crap would end sooner. And it would be easier to spot the diehard right wing misogynists who stir the shit.

Some "fans of porn" here seem to have a short fuse and get aggressive on women's topics that aren't about porn at all.

ProudToBeBlueInRhody

(16,399 posts)
26. Why don't you direct me to the threads where "fans of porn".....
Wed Jun 20, 2012, 03:47 PM
Jun 2012

.....are hijacking saying that the women protesting the Michigan legislature want to ban porn and therefore phooey on them? Or anyone who's turned a discussion of women's right of reproduction into a porn thread by saying "If you defend my right to porn I'll back you on this issue!". Because I have not seen it.

As far as the men's group hate. Enough. There is no trademark on topics. The funny thing is you can go over there and openly talk about it as long as you don't insult members of the protected group and not be banned. So do so if it angers you so much.

I like porn, and I support all those other things and donate and work for candidates who also do and speak out against those don't.....Rick Sanctimonious the prime example. To some people here (thankfully a very tiny minority), that's a contradiction and they won't stand for it. To them, I say. too bad.

ProudToBeBlueInRhody

(16,399 posts)
28. Is that it?
Wed Jun 20, 2012, 04:07 PM
Jun 2012

I'm just trying to figure out why we are all back on the porn jag again. Educate me. Someone must have a thread where someone said there's a quid pro quo here or something. I've read a number of the Michigan legislature threads and see zip there, so I guess I'm in need of a lesson.

Skittles

(153,185 posts)
9. women's issues are secondary to the right to sport a boner
Wed Jun 20, 2012, 03:47 AM
Jun 2012

religious freaks don't care about drugs that give boners, only the drugs that prevent those boners from impregnating

(saw this recently: I bet the Vatican would be pro-condoms if altar boys could get pregnant)

Response to ManyShadesOf (Original post)

quaker bill

(8,224 posts)
13. The problem with porn
Wed Jun 20, 2012, 07:03 AM
Jun 2012

Is that many of us in this country view it as the greatest of obscenities because it involves sex. There are and have been far greater obscenities in this country. The negligence that abandoned the disabled and elderly to die in Hurricane Katrina was a far greater obscenity as one small example. Torturing disarmed, captured, and fully contained enemy combattants at GITMO was another, fortunately for all of us, the videos are not for sale.

 

ManyShadesOf

(639 posts)
15. Agreed
Wed Jun 20, 2012, 11:10 AM
Jun 2012

"Health is at stake here: physical, emotional, psychological, societal. It's all wrapped up together."

 

seabeyond

(110,159 posts)
16. and many of us have a problem with it because of the degradation and dehumanizing of women
Wed Jun 20, 2012, 11:13 AM
Jun 2012

and the effect on all society. which has NOTHING to do with the sex.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Porn Again