General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsSteve Schmidt, GOP strategist, discussed the new strategy by Hillary and her surrogates.
It was on one of the early morning shows on MSNBC...I forget which?
But he questioned whether Hillary was making a mistake in strategy by talking about the Senate candidates down the ballot? He thought they were taking their attention away from Donald and focusing on the Senate opponents?
Do you think the strategy is correct? Or should they keep the focus and definition on Donald J Trump?
saltpoint
(50,986 posts)a very good night on Nov. 8th.
Some attention and cash to down-ballot Democrats seems like a sound strategy to me.
All for a full-court press.
kentuck
(111,110 posts)She is very lucky to have such hard-working surrogates.
That is why she has to fight to keep "Obamacare" and fix the problems in it, and hope for some bi-partisan help. If not, the people need to give her a Congress she can work with. That would be a good deed.
saltpoint
(50,986 posts)that would be a really good thing, and I hope voters see things the same way.
There's a lot of hard work ahead over the next four to eight years.
kentuck
(111,110 posts)The people need to make a change in Congress. This has to be one of the worst Congresses in the history of our nation?
saltpoint
(50,986 posts)GOP House caucus. As many of them as we can toss overboard, the better.
kentuck
(111,110 posts)for the blocks and gridlock in our government. It is he that is blocking the hearing for the Supreme Court nominee.
saltpoint
(50,986 posts)good pal chuck Grassley.
A blue Senate would be a sweet thing this coming January.
world wide wally
(21,754 posts)It shouldn't be a secret!
stopbush
(24,396 posts)It would border on political malpractice to squander this opportunity by not overtly working for the down-ticket racrs.
Renew Deal
(81,871 posts)But she can be blamed for not controlling headlines
loyalsister
(13,390 posts)If by some horrible chance, Trump wins, we have to have a congress that will minimize, if not prevent the damage he could do.
GulfCoast66
(11,949 posts)It's projection. Trying the old 'please don't throw me into the briar patch' routine.
He knows that it is going to hell and they stand to lose the whole kit and kabootle.
spanone
(135,873 posts)mulsh
(2,959 posts)that salient fact first and foremost. I sincerely doubt his loathing of Trump trumps his over all party loyalty.
madokie
(51,076 posts)all but finished
Hill is smart is that she needs the house and senate to get anything done. The more the merrier is the way it is