Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsEPA Bows to Chemical Industry in Delay of Glyphosate Cancer Review
This might have been a tough week for Monsanto Co. The Environmental Protection Agency was slated to hold four days of public meetings focused on essentially one question: Is glyphosate, the worlds most widely used herbicide and the lynchpin to Monsantos fortunes, as safe as Monsanto has spent 40 years telling us it is?
But oddly, the EPA Scientific Advisory Panel (SAP) meetings, called to look at potential glyphosate ties to cancer, were postponed just four days before they were to begin Oct. 18, after intense lobbying by the agrichemical industry. The industry first fought to keep the meetings from being held at all, and argued that if they were held, several leading international experts should be excluded from participating, including any person who has publicly expressed an opinion regarding the carcinogenicity of glyphosate.
As the meetings drew near, CropLife America, which represents the interests of Monsanto and other agribusinesses, specifically took issue with at least two scientists chosen for the panel, alleging the experts might be unfavorably biased against industry interests. On Oct. 12, the group sent a letter to the EPA calling for Dr. Kenneth Portier of the American Cancer Society to be more deeply scrutinized for any pre-formed conclusions about glyphosate.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/carey-gillam/epa-bows-to-chemical-indu_b_12563438.html
But oddly, the EPA Scientific Advisory Panel (SAP) meetings, called to look at potential glyphosate ties to cancer, were postponed just four days before they were to begin Oct. 18, after intense lobbying by the agrichemical industry. The industry first fought to keep the meetings from being held at all, and argued that if they were held, several leading international experts should be excluded from participating, including any person who has publicly expressed an opinion regarding the carcinogenicity of glyphosate.
As the meetings drew near, CropLife America, which represents the interests of Monsanto and other agribusinesses, specifically took issue with at least two scientists chosen for the panel, alleging the experts might be unfavorably biased against industry interests. On Oct. 12, the group sent a letter to the EPA calling for Dr. Kenneth Portier of the American Cancer Society to be more deeply scrutinized for any pre-formed conclusions about glyphosate.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/carey-gillam/epa-bows-to-chemical-indu_b_12563438.html
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
3 replies, 626 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (3)
ReplyReply to this post
3 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
EPA Bows to Chemical Industry in Delay of Glyphosate Cancer Review (Original Post)
womanofthehills
Oct 2016
OP
world wide wally
(21,754 posts)1. This is the kind of thing we have to change...
But we never will with a Republican Congress!
And that is the word we have to get out!
kwolf68
(7,365 posts)2. Just a business decision
If quality of life goes down, the environment gets wrecked, species are pushed to extinction, real places real people live are destroyed and people die it's just the cost of doing business.
For all the complaining by the right wing rober barons, the EVIL EPA proves ineffective. "Lobbying" should never be a part of human safeguard or science, but alas it is and is simply part of the business model.
Nitram
(22,853 posts)3. Perhaps, to give the doomsayers their due, the EPA decided to give more time to weigh the evidence.
The Evidence. Not anecdotes, not gut feelings. Facts.