Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

packman

(16,296 posts)
Sun Oct 16, 2016, 11:19 AM Oct 2016

Social Security -AARP-And Conservative politics



"...fiscal conservatives seeking to cut the program for ideological reasons have resorted to hyping up its financial challenges. It is apparently easier to develop support for cutting promised benefits if people are not sure they will get those benefits anyway.

AARP’s television ad borrows from that conservative framing. The 30-second spot airing on cable news channels shows younger and middle-aged workers ― a cook, a firefighter, a football coach ― doing their jobs and suggests that candidates for public office are not doing theirs in failing to tackle Social Security’s shortfall. It concludes with a warning that Americans could suffer a $10,000 benefit cut if the next president fails to act."

AARP seems to be playing on the fears of the elderly to advance its own agenda . By painting a dire and gloomy picture of the financial future of SS, AARP is pushing for conservative politics

"Just this summer, the group bestowed several of its “Champion of the 50+” awards on Republican lawmakers who have either explicitly supported benefit cuts or expressed openness to them"

And-

"AARP also has some longtime Republican operatives running the campaign. John Hishta, who as AARP’s senior vice president for campaigns runs “Take A Stand,” has a background in Republican politics. He served as executive director of the National Republican Congressional Committee from 2001 to 2002 and as chief of staff to former Virginia Rep. Tom Davis (R) before that. And the group has hired veteran GOP pollster and message guru Frank Luntz to conduct focus groups for “Take A Stand.”

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/aarp-conservative-social-security_us_57fbe10be4b068ecb5e0d0f3?section=&

7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

pangaia

(24,324 posts)
2. AARP is the biggest crock of shit going, right up there with
Sun Oct 16, 2016, 11:23 AM
Oct 2016

the Chamber of Commerce.

I haven't been able to get them to stop sending me junk mail for 2 years.

vlyons

(10,252 posts)
3. Not for "Ideological Reasons"
Sun Oct 16, 2016, 11:42 AM
Oct 2016

It's not for Ayn Rander "ideological reasons" that conservatives want to destroy SSI. But for greed and theft. They want to privatize SSI by banks, wall street, and insurance compaines, so they can skim 30% off the top for "administrative costs" and marketing on TV. That means that every paycheck, every year, from your very first job to when you retire will have a big chunk of money that you earned and is supposed to be stashed in your retirement benefits will go to Wall St CEOs.

Make no mistake. The Republican party is a vast criminal enterprise.

MrScorpio

(73,631 posts)
4. Believe it or not, there's a winger seniors org, just to the right of the AARP
Sun Oct 16, 2016, 11:49 AM
Oct 2016

They think that the AARP is too "leftist."

The people on that RWNJ station I listen to from time to time are to the right of Atilla the Hun anyway.

Vinca

(50,273 posts)
5. We're on SS and recently got junk mail from AARP with their "Save SS" spiel.
Sun Oct 16, 2016, 11:50 AM
Oct 2016

IMO, the organization is part of the conservative plot to privatize everything and nothing more.

Wounded Bear

(58,656 posts)
6. It's been going on for decades...
Sun Oct 16, 2016, 12:25 PM
Oct 2016

It's the old "it won't be there when I retire" crap. I was hearing it back in the 1980's and 90's myself. That's why my generation has been paying double since Reagan. It was supposed to be 'pay as you go." They set up the "trust fund." It wasn't supposed to carry a surplus.

A few fairly minor tweaks would keep the program solvent for another 50-75 years. Of course, to do that we'd need a Congress that is actually willing to do their fucking jobs.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Social Security -AARP-And...