General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsMcMansions are a poor investment
The massive, gaudy houses lining the streets of Americas upscale suburbs began to look like the epitome of bad taste and poor judgement once the foreclosure crisis hit. The writer behind the blog McMansion Hell tells why theyll eventually be gone for good.
Kate Wagner, a 22-year-old getting her masters degree in architectural acoustics at Johns Hopkins University in Baltimore, has been researching consumer trends in architecture since she was in high school. Her background knowledge has given her ammunition for McMansion Hell, which she started writing this summer. At first, she wrote for a few friends to let off steam about the houses she despises, but the blog quickly gained followers.
Theres literally nothing that would convince me to live in a McMansion, Wagner said. I would rather donate it to a fire department to use for controlled burns.
Wagner marks up real estate listing photos like a merciless English teacher. Her snarky but informative explanations of the problems with McMansions make architecture criticism accessible for people who arent experts.
Theres no hard-and-fast definition of a McMansion, but Wagner has a long list of criteria. McMansions are oversized ― more than 3,000 square feet, with five or more bedrooms and a garage for three or more cars ― and typically too large for the size of their lot.
One of the defining factors of the McMansion is this concept of waste and the proliferation of excess and
pushing this illusion of wealth, Wagner said.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/realestate/the-type-of-house-you-should-never-buy/ar-AAiVgWM?li=BBnbfcN&ocid=edgsp
Illusion of wealth? Who does that bring to mind?
get the red out
(13,468 posts)I would keep our small, 1961, stone ranch with the big yard for our dogs if someone offered me a McMansion for free. They are very ugly, IMO.
Cracklin Charlie
(12,904 posts)I would bet that half of the 4300 sq feet is never, ever, used for anything but walking through to get to usable space.
Liberal_in_LA
(44,397 posts)Like a large space at the top of the stairs
moondust
(20,005 posts)creates wasteful demand that probably tends to keep utility prices higher for everybody--something I've been bitching about for 30 years.
forgotmylogin
(7,530 posts)There's nothing wrong with five bedrooms. There's nothing wrong with lots of rooms - I've always thought how awesome it would be to have a space that is a library, a space separate from my bedroom for a computer room/office so I can have a room that is *just* for sleep. Bedrooms can be repurposed into other things. I'd love to have a guest room where someone can visit late and just go to sleep rather than driving back home, and have their own quarters and bathroom for privacy. I'd love a formal sitting room that remains straightened up so when someone drops by for coffee, you've got a well-maintained space constantly ready without clutter and they don't need to see your kitchen or mail piling up everywhere. I'd love a living room without a TV or a computer that always looks awesome, and a family room that doesn't but is more comfortable to play and watch tv in. I want to have a party in a parlor connected to my dining room so people aren't having to lounge in the chairs at the table and mess up the plate settings.
Give me rooms. I'll find uses for them. You can close them off and not heat/cool them when not in use.
What is tacky about a McMansion despite the high bedroom and bathroom count (those are useable rooms) the rest of the space is just space. Your great room is great, but what's it for? One corner is a dining room, the kitchen is open to it there's a giant TV and it's all just one continuous space where nobody has any privacy, and the giant volume of air sucks up the heating and cooling bill. The room is so big you have to buy several rooms worth of couches and end tables to scatter around so you aren't walking across a mall courtyard. Some might find these big giant vaulted multipurpose rooms attractive because you can see the kitchen and the kitchen can watch tv and the dining room conversation echoes up to the second floor loft. But then you have to YELL back and forth. But honestly, if a room can swallow 20 people comfortably, shouldn't they all be focused on one task instead five different ones that the room offers?
ailsagirl
(22,899 posts)It would give me the creeps at night. All those empty rooms...
I'm happy where I am.
Bonx
(2,075 posts)Who do these people think they are ?
snooper2
(30,151 posts)3400 square feet, 5 bedroom 3 bath...Only have a two car garage so I guess mine doesn't make the cut.
Got a little over a quarter acre so maybe she can come help me cut the grass and enjoy the trampoline in the back yard
Here is a house that is a few blocks away from me...Just Hideous isn't it
711 Lariat Ln
Wylie, TX 75098 Get Directions
Calculate Commute Time
Print Share Save
4 beds 3 full baths 2,921 sq ft0.27 acres lot
$287,500
yeoman6987
(14,449 posts)Mariana
(14,860 posts)in the long run. There are exceptions, but an awful lot of those houses are built out of the very cheapest materials and the workmanship is shoddy. Look at the bottom of those cabinets in that kitchen shot, you can see they're made of particle board. These homes tend not to be insulated well and those windows are probably similar quality as the cabinets and drafty as hell. That lawn looks like St. Augustine grass which is a real water hog. The brick will get hot with the sun on it all day and then radiate heat for hours at night. Etc.
Travis_0004
(5,417 posts)You can tell all the problems the house has with one photo over the internet.
New construction is often cheaper in a lot of ways, but I would bet the insulation is significantly better than older houses.
Mariana
(14,860 posts)Doesn't take any expert to see that from the picture. In Texas brick does radiate heat at night, which sucks in the summertime. The rest I was speculating about, which is clear from words like "probably" that I used in that post.
snooper2
(30,151 posts)Which I am in the process of re-doing all in white as wife wants LOL
Oh, and you were talking about energy costs..My electric bill last month was $260 all electric house. My last house was 1400 square feet, built in 1976 and my electric bill would hit over $400 some months during summer. Because it was built like shit. Construction standards have made noticeable differences in energy efficiency over the years. Have high quality double pane windows now unlike the crappy single pane storm windows in last house.
Even the two 50 gallon water heaters are high end efficiency....
Oh, and my counter tops are square FYI
Exilednight
(9,359 posts)I upscaled my house with 2 X 6 construction and bamboo floors. Almost all cabinets are made of particle board these days. The only other option is plywood which has a tendency to warp in transport. The cabinet faces are always made of solid wood along with the drawer fronts. The only people who make particle face fronts are companies that build DIY cabinets and require on-site assembly, which a builder will not pay his crew a $100 to assemble a $50 cabinet when they can upgrade for the same price and save time.
Ilsa
(61,698 posts)Family crashing, adult children at home, of course a little more space makes it a bit more tolerable when three generations are together.
DFW
(54,436 posts)How far a drive is that from downtown Dallas? ¾ hour? 1 hour? And it looks like over an hour to to the airport. Nice and cheap if you don't need to move around much, and especially if it is near the lake.
spooky3
(34,475 posts)a fixer upper condo in a very rough neighborhood.
DFW
(54,436 posts)I know only too well. I now live 4000 miles from there, but I get back a few times a year.
spooky3
(34,475 posts)Love the small town feel of the main street of FC. Arlington here.
However, if I can change my schedule so as to still be in the States that late, you're on! Usually I have to be back in Europe before that.
Broad Street in Falls Church--those were the days! Although I lived outside town. Only way to get anywhere was by car or canoe.
Hekate
(90,788 posts)...but kee-riste is real state expensive. Nobody outside coastal California can even grasp how it is. The price for that beautiful house in Texas is what we here call a down-payment on something substantially smaller.
TexasBushwhacker
(20,214 posts)Some of the ones that aren't into showing off take their profits from their CA house and just buy a similar house for half as much and PAY CASH. $300K still buys a nice house in Austin.
snooper2
(30,151 posts)And I'm 5-8 minutes from Lavon and 5-8 minutes to the top of Ray Hubbard ---
Just went fishing couple weekends ago by the Lavon dam
OriginalGeek
(12,132 posts)also up to Texoma and out to Possum Kingdom. Unfortunately, it was with my step-father so now I hate camping and fishing and I wouldn't own a boat for money. I will go out on a friends' boat for a ride and some drinkin' but no interest in all that other stuff. Stuff I used to love before Stepfather.
Response to snooper2 (Reply #10)
JI7 This message was self-deleted by its author.
Mariana
(14,860 posts)Big cheaply built tacky ugly houses on little bitty lots.
JI7
(89,264 posts)so they try to get the bigger thing for less ?
i can see that.
if they are cheap on cheap land they can be easily torn down .
Response to JI7 (Reply #90)
JI7 This message was self-deleted by its author.
Mariana
(14,860 posts)are thinking they should "get the most house they can afford". It's not necessarily about showing off. A lot of people still believe it's always advantageous to buy a bigger house rather than a smaller one. I think they generally have no idea that the houses are crap. They usually look decent enough, especially on the inside, if you don't look too closely and see the cheapo materials and the sloppy workmanship. Honestly, a lot of people don't really notice right off that counters aren't level and walls aren't plumb, or that the cabinets are flimsy, stuff like that.
Odin2005
(53,521 posts)The Velveteen Ocelot
(115,835 posts)Not the worst McMansion I've ever seen, but ugly anyhow.
LeftyMom
(49,212 posts)but at least the windows are the same size (though a bit out of proportion to the house as whole) and shape for once and there's not a expanse of garage in the front.
The door is out of proportion to the house (and cheap and boring.)
The interior has the usual mcmansion sins of being horrifically beige, the kitchen being dated and cheap looking, the lighting being cheap, etc.
The landscape is awful. Anybody with that much grass in a dry climate is an asshole.
But at least there aren't stuck on styrofoam features around the windows and there's a slight chance that the stone isn't fake?
forgotmylogin
(7,530 posts)That's a generously-sized house.
Here is the silliness:
Stupid rooms bigger than they need be and misshapen:
(Hysterical captions not mine, from McMansionhell.com)
tblue37
(65,483 posts)Odin2005
(53,521 posts)Denzil_DC
(7,256 posts)LOL
susanna
(5,231 posts)Odin2005
(53,521 posts)TexasBushwhacker
(20,214 posts)And that overhang on the left just doesn't work for me.
jmowreader
(50,562 posts)meadowlark5
(2,795 posts)A house like that in any suburb of Denver would be minimum $400,000. And if in a desirable neighborhood, $500,000s for sure.
metroins
(2,550 posts)Not sure why everybody is hating on it.
Response to Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin (Original post)
kestrel91316 This message was self-deleted by its author.
irisblue
(33,021 posts)Response to irisblue (Reply #32)
kestrel91316 This message was self-deleted by its author.
awoke_in_2003
(34,582 posts)is that they are a good place to go during tornados. Of course, the soil in DFW area does not allow for basements (unless you want to spend a lot of money to make one that would work here)
Response to awoke_in_2003 (Reply #39)
kestrel91316 This message was self-deleted by its author.
awoke_in_2003
(34,582 posts)to one day return to Ohio (left in 92). We have a center in Columbus. Maybe once the grandchildren grow up.
Odin2005
(53,521 posts)Avalon Sparks
(2,566 posts)No one has them in Texas!
The house I grew up in, Pittsburgh/70's, had a huge basement. I used to roller skate in it everyday. I would love to have a basement like that again, and I would skate in it again too!
Stupid clay....😡
Odin2005
(53,521 posts)Basements extend the foundation down below the freeze line to reduce the risk of the foundation shifting because of the expansion of frozen soil in the winter.
Jim Beard
(2,535 posts)cable, internet and other stuff. It isn't heaven but it is far from hell for old folks.
Response to Jim Beard (Reply #69)
kestrel91316 This message was self-deleted by its author.
Hekate
(90,788 posts)...my husband (whom I love a lot) hates change anyway. Sometimes he thinks we could move to something bigger, but you have to travel a good 40 miles to find the right price.
I tell you, I DREAM of a 3,000 sf house with bookcases everywhere. Even 2600 sf! Call it a McMansion -- I can work with that! Instead, as I hit my 69th birthday at the end of September, I realized what I'm going to have to do instead is find another home for most of my books, one that does not share the same roof with me.
May you find the home and garden of your dreams.
PS: I think I have actually seen and rejected a bunch of overbuilt monstrosities. There is still such a thing as good taste.
JustAnotherGen
(31,878 posts)We have a full third floor. Bedroom, bath, unfinished attic space - with shelves. Lots of shelves. Book collection is up there!
My house is a hundred years old though. Custom arts and crafts Tudor. We live in NJ. We looked at McMansions but they don't have brick foundations with cement surrounds, plaster walls, Windows that twist out, etc etc.
My husband is from Southern Italy and the House there (his parents left it to us) was built in the 1600's. His dad said when we bought ours and Skyped him through it prior to renovation and restoration: It's so new!
Hekate
(90,788 posts)That's part of our problem logistically: our knees grew older (desire to maintain a single floor) and land grew more expensive (so everything built in the last 25 years is two-story).
Best wishes for you and your library -- and the 17th century house!
Sherman A1
(38,958 posts)and while it's handy to go there for family holiday gatherings, I consider it to be a gigantic waste of space. It was not built well and has not held up well to the passage of time. I recall the first Christmas they were in the place and we were standing by the front door saying our goodbyes when I mentioned to him that each of the hinges on his giant double doors was missing screws.
Never was interested in one and wouldn't have one if it was given to me.
Throd
(7,208 posts)RKP5637
(67,112 posts)yeoman6987
(14,449 posts)It's pretty nice compared to my 1900 square foot home. They have 4 kids though so the extra rooms are helpful. My brother and his wife have a 3500 square foot house. It's also nice. Actually mine is decent. I'm glad to have one floor ranch. I have a two car garage but wish I had a three car garage like my siblings. That's one thing I'd change to my house.
TuxedoKat
(3,818 posts)to have a ranch. My previous house was a ranch and I didn't know how good I had it. I could clean that house in a snap. It was so great having every thing on the same level. If I ever buy another house again, will definitely buy a ranch.
Glassunion
(10,201 posts)I want more garage than livable space.
My wife agrees.
One_Life_To_Give
(6,036 posts)Hey if I get to avoid crawling under a car in the snow might as well go the whole way and get to stand up.
awoke_in_2003
(34,582 posts)I park my vehicle outside under a carport. The garage houses the wife's Mini and my 1982 Harley. They call it a two car garage (single 16 foot wide door) but it is really a 1.5
RKP5637
(67,112 posts)to buy one.
Shrike47
(6,913 posts)But then, we do our own housework.
cornball 24
(1,480 posts)apparent that the young owners could not afford to furnish all the rooms. Never could understand why they became so popular. Guess it is the "big is beautiful" concept. From the standpoint of the builders of these monstrosities, it's no doubt "if you build it, they will come" marketing strategy.
Warpy
(111,338 posts)The main problem with McMansions is that they tend to be Californicated, built to express all the latest fads in California and destined to look shabby and dated when the fads change, usually within a couple of years. In addition, instead of being places to live, they tend to be places to show off and entertain lots of people in, meaning they're given to large dedicated spaces like the private home theater, the large, equipment filled workout room, the game room and so on but without the family bedrooms and guest rooms that people with real money generally own. McMansions want to be glitzy, flashy, faddish, and that makes them temporary. Most will be razed once the trendy yuppies move on to something trendier. They're stage sets for the trendy life and once the trends die, they will be struck.
susanna
(5,231 posts)I've been saying a lot of what she says for years to anyone who will listen. (Faux keystones, pediments and columns are my particular pet peeves.) Now I have a blog link I can send to my friends.
As for new time suck, yep. I spent a half hour out there just now. She has some doozies on that site!
on edit: spelling
XemaSab
(60,212 posts)We have a lot of very nice neighborhoods here, thank you very much!
Warpy
(111,338 posts)I realize not everyone in California is a Trendy, that's where my extended family mostly is. However, that's ground zero for realtors, renovation contractors and interior desecrators, probably due as much to the TV shows filmed there as to the rich and superficial person's desire to be ahead of the fashion curve in everything.
Following fads is why McMansions tend to look tired and dated when people try to sell them a few years down the line. Making them out of fake materials is only part of the problem.
dem in texas
(2,674 posts)Dallas has many beautiful old neighborhoods with 1930 brick homes, 1950's brick ranch style homes with big yards and 1930 frame cottages and lots of tall trees. People buy the home, tear it down and build a huge stucco McMansion that takes up the whole property so there is no yard and the oversized house goes to the edge of the property line.
Dallas has tried to pass some building regulations to stop it, but from what I see it is still going on. We go estate sales all over Dallas and it is depressing to how these big homes can destroy the character of a charming, picturesque neighborhood.
My daughter used to own a little 2 bedroom frame home on Red Bird Lane in Grapevine. This little road runs up along the lake. It was cute road, a hidden treasure and mostly had will frame houses and week-end cottages. Then people discovered the area and started buying up the homes and tearing them down to build monster houses. A few doors down from my daughter, someone built a 3 story Macmansion. A macmansion was built behind my daughter and the owners continually complained about the trees on my daughter's property. Nothing was wrong with the trees, they just did not match the landscape as far as these people wanted. Finally, my daughter got a offer that she couldn't refuse and sold her home and it was torn down to build a MacMansion. She now lives in Arlington, another cute older neighborhood, will probably be tearing down homes there soon.
Skittles
(153,192 posts)first time I have seen real, non-pretentious houses in a while
Phentex
(16,334 posts)First, I don't understand the need for such a large home but that's not something I would fault anybody else for wanting. However, I have a problem with building these monstrosities on lots that are too small for the house. In our neighborhood, most of the lots were huge when the houses were built back in the 60's. And some of the McMansions don't look as ridiculous when they are built with a little setback. Meanwhile, some are built from inch to inch of the lot line, leaving the look you are talking about. THEY ARE IN YOUR FACE! and end up looking like small hotels. I also have a problem with the ones that are built like row houses but with a few feet in between. They took the lots and divided them into strips and built row houses three stories tall with postage stamp front yards and drive under garages. Lego houses that shoot up into the sky.
As for style, yes, we see it all. The ones with every type of finish all on the same house. The turrets. The nubs. The keystones, the metal roof on part, and 14 different roof styles.
OriginalGeek
(12,132 posts)I grew up in Dallas and whenever I think of "home" that's what comes to mind. I left in the early 80s and have only been back twice since but I didn't get to explore much. I'd probably hate to look around too much.
TlalocW
(15,389 posts)Magic shows and balloon twisting for birthday parties, etc. I have been in more than my fair share of McMansions. One in particular sticks out in my head - the playroom in the basement where the kids were playing was bigger than any house I've ever lived in - including garage. After I had gotten all the kids something, the parents asked me to come upstairs to make balloons for the adults who were all in the large dining/kitchen area. At one point, two older kids left the area by heading out past me to go back to the basement and then reappeared through a door on the other side where the hostess was standing, and she couldn't figure out what path they took that would allow them to do that.
I like these jobs because the people are well-off - or appear to be at least, so that usually gets me some good tips added on to my fees, but I always feel like the house is so fragile. I've worked in older, just-as-large homes as well that come close to being mansions, built back in the day of oil tycoons and robber barons, and I don't get that vibe there.
TlalocW
Lars39
(26,115 posts)panader0
(25,816 posts)It's around 3,000 sq ft. The kids had their own half house, own bathroom, etc.
But now they're gone and I have three empty bedrooms, so I have curtained off
their side and Jeannie and I live comfortably on "our" side. Two story, two bath,
four bedrooms---it's now a lot of wasted space.
mahatmakanejeeves
(57,600 posts)by ARLnow.com October 14, 2016 at 11:30 am
[font size=1]The owner of a huge mansion in Lyon Park is asking for the countys permission to use it as a bed and breakfast.[/font]
Yogi Dumera, the restaurateur behind Delhi Dhaba and Arlington Rooftop Bar and Grill in Courthouse, recently filed a bed and breakfast use permit application for his 13,700 square foot house at 3120 N. Pershing Drive.
The item is on the Arlington County Boards agenda for this Saturday, but county staff is recommending it be deferred to December to give Dumera time to discuss the proposal with the Lyon Park community.
The palatial house was controversial when it was built a decade ago, attracting opposition from neighbors, who said its massive size compared to other homes in the community was absurd. Neighbors at the time also worried about the house being used for commercial purposes.
From a 2005 Washington Post article:
Its scale is absurd, said neighbor Alan Tober, who, along with others, worries that the house will be used for commercial purposes namely weddings.
But property owner Yogi Dumera said he has no such plans. He is only taking advantage of his large lot, he said.
spooky3
(34,475 posts)After that house was built residents pushed the county for more zoning restrictions to prevent this from recurring. (Several houses like this were built during the bubble--all of them hated).
mahatmakanejeeves
(57,600 posts)I can't find pictures now. I'll look later.
spooky3
(34,475 posts)mahatmakanejeeves
(57,600 posts)north of Lee Highway. It's not really a McMansion, just plain weird. They guy built what is basically a castle. It was put up in the late 1980s. The house is well known.
Look at Google Maps for the intersection of George Mason Drive and 23rd Road North. The house is in the northeast corner of that intersection. You can't make it out in the street view, because the owners have surrounded it with loblolly pines to prevent you from having to see it. I'm pretty sure that's the location. I haven't been over there in a while.
The one up near Bishop O'Connell High School is on Sycamore Street. It is in the southeast corner of the intersection with 27th Street North. It is also not really a McMansion, just wrong for the neighborhood. It is huge. It looks like a dorm. It is surrounded by houses, built years earlier, that are a fraction its size. Again, it is well known.
I am at the library, so I am limited in time to searching Google Images for either house. I'll get those pictures when I can.
All of northern Virginia is full of McMansions. It's all that government contracting money. Those aren't government workers living in them, but government contractors.
Sen. Walter Sobchak
(8,692 posts)Ms. Wagner also thinks spending $500,000 on a 300 square foot apartment with junkie's needles littering the sidewalk is a great investment.
Foggyhill
(1,060 posts)Architecture, material and workmanship
Even from an urban planning pic they are poor
Better build a smaller better built house than those monstronsity which tend to be faddish and hard to resell
etherealtruth
(22,165 posts)Sen. Walter Sobchak
(8,692 posts)In her ideal world, McMansions would eventually disappear as people traded sprawling suburbia for sustainability ― dense, walkable and diverse neighborhoods.
Some twenty-something white kid whining about the suburbs, real ground-breaking stuff.
etherealtruth
(22,165 posts)I am giving you he benefit of the doubt. I had assumed if you actually had read it prior to your initial response you would have gleaned much more information. your disagreement with her would likely have not been a peripheral statement, but an argument in support of the architectural design so often found in what she identifies as McMansions.
I am in agreement with her regarding the aesthetics so often associated with these new constructions.
Sen. Walter Sobchak
(8,692 posts)That statement proves that this is not merely an issue of architectural design. She is clearly stating that she rejects suburbia.
etherealtruth
(22,165 posts)Sen. Walter Sobchak
(8,692 posts)better luck next time.
Odin2005
(53,521 posts)etherealtruth
(22,165 posts)I've commented without reading an article before ... If I am called on it I own it
You just look foolish when you don't
Sen. Walter Sobchak
(8,692 posts)Last edited Mon Oct 17, 2016, 08:31 PM - Edit history (1)
Odin2005
(53,521 posts)...rather than in McMansions people could afford to live in the city.
Sen. Walter Sobchak
(8,692 posts)I'm not going to have a debate with someone arguing fanciful theoreticals against the real world, hence I deleted my other two replies.
I am completely, 100% in support of building public housing. But the need is far to great to build it on the most expensive real estate on the planet so a lucky few can win the apartment lottery.
Odin2005
(53,521 posts)Ecologically, socially, and morally unsustainable.
Sen. Walter Sobchak
(8,692 posts)What is ecologically, socially, and morally unsustainable is the filth and gridlock of cities and the inherent injustice of people earning the median income living in borderline poverty.
Odin2005
(53,521 posts)Suburbia is derived from wasteful American car culture, racism (sundown towns and red-lining), and an anti-urban mindset with it's roots in Fascistic romanticism and it's hatred for the "urban decadence" of the great cities (Henry Ford, an unapologetic Fascist, was one noted city-hater). Dense urbanization is better for the environment, better for those like me who can't drive (and so are defacto second class citizens because of that, suburbia is an abuse of the human rights of those who because of disability cannot drive), and is better for society because it encourages a feeling of community rather than the soul-destroying social atomism that Suburbia promotes.
And your poverty argument is a straw man, the only reason living in the inner city is so expensive is because of lack of investment in high density housing.
Nobody needs a 3000 sq. ft. house. The spiraling size of houses is a symptom of the dysfuction of social atomism, people doing things in their own home alone or with family rather than in the community with neighbors. In a dense urban environment you don't really need all that personal space because perfectly functional public spaces are just a short walk, trolley, or subway trip away.
Response to Odin2005 (Reply #115)
Sen. Walter Sobchak This message was self-deleted by its author.
Travis_0004
(5,417 posts)I would hate to live in a City. Give me a house on 10 acres anyday vs a house on a tenth of an acre lot.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)and no, watching a production of Rent doesn't count.
Sen. Walter Sobchak
(8,692 posts)I spend a lot of time in both for work.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)Sen. Walter Sobchak
(8,692 posts)geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)Response to geek tragedy (Reply #143)
Sen. Walter Sobchak This message was self-deleted by its author.
LeftInTX
(25,545 posts)citood
(550 posts)15k square feet, never lived in, torn down.
wordpix
(18,652 posts)for 5 yrs. and helped rebuild (historically) with my then partner, who owned it. Some rich guy bought it and modernized it, turning it into a McMansion. He/his family was never there. He put at least a $million into stone walls fronting the road, he also redid the barn and attached it to the house. I peeked in the window one day and all our beautiful chestnut posts, beams and floorboards were gone! Now he's trying to sell. He was never even there. Sad
GreenEyedLefty
(2,073 posts)and being struck by how poorly built the homes were.
I've had the opportunity to visit many of these dwellings over the years.
In addition to the utter lack of character, these homes are devoid of craftsmanship. They are big and that's about all.
Buckeye_Democrat
(14,856 posts)... in little time at all!
They're mostly made of wood and plastic and don't seem "built to last" to me.
Liberal_in_LA
(44,397 posts)forgotmylogin
(7,530 posts)- Disregard of balance or symmetry
- Garage nearly 1/2 size of the rest of the house, 2-3-+ bays
- Entire lawn is driveway
- Poor quality building materials
- Materials used incorrectly, elements appear tacked on
- Roof way way too large, sometimes as big as entire interior of house
- Improper mix of eclectic styles or too many styles at once
- Mix of materials - "rock"work and siding, or too much different rockwork, material mixnmatch like wallpaper
- Entry door lost in facade, ridiculous porticos
- Multistory windows, inappropriate and mismatched windows, windows not sized similarly, random windows
- Multiple rooflines for no reason, house appears as a "compound" of structures instead of one building
- Clutter clutter clutter
- Pillars and columns used decoratively instead of for support, mixed columns, columns too small or too large for what they support
- Elements oversized unnecessarily in general
hatrack
(59,592 posts)A lot of it is the care with which she picks her examples (which are indeed appalling), and her focus on phony architectural details, badly built, is laser-like.
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)Some of that shit is pretty funny, too. "The Pringles Can of Shame"
yardwork
(61,703 posts)dembotoz
(16,832 posts)XemaSab
(60,212 posts)Plywood and chicken wire with a stucco veneer.
Mariana
(14,860 posts)They use flakeboard.
TexasBushwhacker
(20,214 posts)kimbutgar
(21,187 posts)Before my Mother passed away in May I used to pay her utility bills. That big old house averaged $350 a month in utility bills while my small house maybe $125 max in the 4 winter months.
Plus you have to interact more with your family in a small house.
white_wolf
(6,238 posts)Plus I don't have as much to maintain.
Kablooie
(18,641 posts)The houses are themed. The gingerbread house, the southern mansion, the English Tudor, the frank Lloyd Wright, etc.
None of them have yards you can use. Just enough for some green in front.
The entrance halls are large cold places with echoing stair cases and distant huge chandeliers.
I'd hate living in one.
Major Nikon
(36,827 posts)The real estate market is always fickle so you might sell higher than you bought, or you might not. In the mean time you are paying property taxes and if you bought more space than what you needed, you are also paying more for heating, cooling, and upkeep.
Mariana
(14,860 posts)A home is a place to live. I do think that if someone is going to buy, it's worthwhile to get a house that was built well.
Throd
(7,208 posts)davidn3600
(6,342 posts)If you rent, what money do you think your landlord is using to pay his taxes....yours.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)when you rent, you pay someone else's mortgage, without getting the tax deduction.
TexasBushwhacker
(20,214 posts)a lot of people don't itemize. I have considered buying an older condo though. You can get them cheap in Houston and then I would have some control over my monthly payment/rent. I don't have heirs, so the investment value isn't really an issue.
Travis_0004
(5,417 posts)I own several homes that I rent out, and I have turned a profit every year. Most of the houses are 1500 to 2,000 sq feet. Also, who do you think it paying the property taxes? Sure I make the actual payments, but that is factored into rent. If my property taxes go up, then I just raise the rent accordingly.
Meanwhile, since I have a fixed mortgage (and one is paid off), my cost stay about the same, but rent keeps rising, so as a landlord every year is more profitable then the next.
You could argue there are advantages to renting, you can be flexible, and move quickly, and when the roof leaks, I'm paying 5,000 to fix it, so you don't need that money up front, but every month you are paying into my maintenance fund, you just don't know it.
JustAnotherGen
(31,878 posts)It's old, has character and is a "home".
I seriously don't understand the concept of where you live your life being an "investment".
I think if more people thought about how they "live" and use their space - they would question themselves about bigger being better.
Because of my husbands work he can tell quality of a build. We looked at a few of these but went back to our gut instinct - historical, old, restored to former glory with things we could "live in".
Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin
(108,190 posts)Last edited Mon Oct 17, 2016, 10:15 PM - Edit history (1)
My mortgage including escrow is $800 for a 1000 sq. ft. 3 bedroom house in the Seattle area. You can't even rent a studio apartment for that now.
Major Nikon
(36,827 posts)It's just that as an investment they aren't that great. Many people buy far more home than what they need, or they trade up as soon as they have any equity with the intention of retiring and cashing out their capital gains. Sometimes this works and sometimes it doesn't, but it should be weighed against the risk and benefit of other investments.
smirkymonkey
(63,221 posts)I grew up in an old colonial town and only about 10 new homes have been built since the turn of the century. My family home was built in 1830 and our home before that was built in 1806. Almost all of the homes in the village are early 19th century and while many of them are large, they are all attractive historic buildings.
I'm so glad that there are villages like mine who place value on historic properties as opposed to knocking them down and building huge, ugly, modern monstrosities.
Odin2005
(53,521 posts)Her commentary and these tacky shit homes has me in stitches!
hughee99
(16,113 posts)movies, or beer is? It's like that.
Sure, I enjoy a little bit of snark as much as the next person (maybe even a little more), and I'd agree that some of the architecture is a disaster, but at a certain point, Wagner moves from describing what she considers architecturally wrong with the house, to what she considers wrong with the interior design of the house, to what she considers wrong with the people who live there. At that point, the pretentiousness becomes more unbearable than the snark is amusing.