General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsA Lot Of People Are Pissed Off That All The Nobel Prizes Went To Men This Year
Of the 900 prizes awarded in the Nobels history, just 48 have gone to women.
This year zero, zip, nada!
https://www.buzzfeed.com/tomchivers/rainy-day-women?bftw&utm_term=.xgPOOwYrre#.pjQYYm2ddl
DetlefK
(16,423 posts)How many men and how many women were even nominated for a Nobel Price?
obamanut2012
(26,081 posts)Response to boston bean (Original post)
GummyBearz This message was self-deleted by its author.
The2ndWheel
(7,947 posts)I don't know what the standings were in each category.
closeupready
(29,503 posts)RAFisher
(466 posts)Looks like the anti science crowd is spewing this propaganda. Having a conversation about which women should have been awarded the prize in Medicine, Chemistry and Physics is too complicated for these people. They most likely don't have an argument and don't care enough about science to understand why the award was awarded to winner.
Im completely open to a discussion about why a particular women should have won over who actually won. But that does not seem to be what they are doing here.
NaturalHigh
(12,778 posts)closeupready
(29,503 posts)?? Is science misogynist?
Is everyone on DU misogynist?
??
romanic
(2,841 posts)It's especially telling that most of the comments (most of them women) point out the author's failure for not naming any women that should've won a Nobel this year over the very qualified men that won.
Again buzzfeed and any other millennial aimed newsource sucks.
ismnotwasm
(41,991 posts)Then they wonder how Trump is even a thing.
NaturalHigh
(12,778 posts)and still be amused that someone seems to think there is some sort of injustice because more women weren't given Nobel prizes this year.
obamanut2012
(26,081 posts)And, the Nobels are known to historically slight women.
davidn3600
(6,342 posts)Tokenism won't help anyone. It will only mask the bigger problems.
Women only making up 15-20% of STEM majors should be the bigger concern than the gender of who wins certain awards.
JTFrog
(14,274 posts)Last edited Fri Oct 14, 2016, 11:14 AM - Edit history (1)
Doesn't matter, they are men, so they deserve it. And they just assume that no woman could have been considered as good.
I bet they still don't know the names of the men who won. Besides Bob Dylan.
Blue_Tires
(55,445 posts)But which woman nominee was clearly cheated out of a Nobel?
kcr
(15,317 posts)Shame
CaliforniaPeggy
(149,640 posts)Then they need to be encouraged to work in those fields, without discrimination or harassment.
THEN they will be in the pipeline for Nobel prizes, just as the men are.
That will lead to a more equitable outcome.
I suspect that the gender of the nominated person doesn't matter to the Nobel committee. They look at the history and the accomplishments of the person, as they should.
In my opinion, the gender of the person being nominated or considered for nomination, should not matter.