General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsDetlefK
(16,423 posts)bmstee01
(453 posts)If they did it would be a disaster. I've tried not to read about it a lot bc I don't want to know what's in someone private emails. None of my business
trotsky
(49,533 posts)You know their private e-mails would be out of this world.
Gman
(24,780 posts)Trump needs to stop the bleeding and turn things around. Anything extra taken from Trump's emails, etc. would just be lost in the flood of bad news.
If Anonymous has something confirming the latest sleaze or something new, waiting closer to the election could drive a stake through his burnt orange heart.
malaise
(269,063 posts)Act_of_Reparation
(9,116 posts)Unless I'm mistaken, hackers furnish them with data, which they in turn publish.
The absence of dirt on Trump, I imagine, is due to a lack of interest from organized, state-sponsored hackers.
RAFisher
(466 posts)I actually do wonder if Wikileaks would release Trump campaign e-mails if they had them. I'm inclined to think that they would. Wikileaks is just the "useful idiot" that Russia uses so that it's harder to trace back to them.
world wide wally
(21,744 posts)beachbum bob
(10,437 posts)Coyotl
(15,262 posts)If you have evidence to the contrary, please share it.
Raster
(20,998 posts)questions are: (1) who is providing the alleged Clinton information; and (2) is Wikileaks also receiving tRump information and not dumping it?
Is Wikileaks an equal opportunity dumper, or does Assange have his own one-sided agenda?
Glamrock
(11,802 posts)Can one hack a dumpster fire?