General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsHelp...Does anyone have any evidence that...
Hillary Clinton" attacked the victims of Bill Clintons indiscretions?.
Funny.. that sick Fuck Ruddy G.stated to Chuck Todd that he confessed his indiscretions with regards to his wives to his Priest so that hes now good to go..
But I dont remember Hillary attacking anyone.. She might have been backing up her husband..but I dont remember the attacks.. I could be wrong, so if you have any info.. please enlighten..
http://www.thedailybeast.com/cheats/2016/10/02/giuliani-confronted-over-past-infidelities-while-attacking-clintons.html?via=desktop&source=copyurl
Yonnie3
(17,442 posts)Jeffersons Ghost
(15,235 posts)Last edited Mon Oct 3, 2016, 01:08 AM - Edit history (1)
question everything
(47,481 posts)Earlier this year I posted on a conservative blog about all the racists cartoons about Obama. Asked for help here, did not get any but googling it found. Plenty. Many by local Republican chapters.
Jeffersons Ghost
(15,235 posts)busterbrown
(8,515 posts)Paranoia runs deep around here...
Yonnie3
(17,442 posts)Perhaps you should have asked directly for what you wanted.
You posted:
"Help ... Does anyone have any evidence that Hillary Clinton " attacked the victims of Bill Clintons indiscretions?."
I simply asked why you wanted this evidence. You could have answered me along the lines of "I want to know how to refute this claim."
But you say instead:
"Paranoia runs deep around here..."
Words have meanings. Perhaps you should reconsider the use of the word "paranoia."
vlyons
(10,252 posts)No one cared way back when Bill was impeached, and no one but Trump and his surrogates cares now. It's a DISTRACTION to keep from discussing the issues. Trump got nothing else.
Journeyman
(15,031 posts)and both, ultimately, have much in their lives that disturbs them -- on a subconscious level -- and these regrets and fears manifest themselves in irrational attacks against others.
Or it could be their pathological need to lie about every aspect of every detail of their lives.
Take a pick. Neither's more credible than the next and all are armchair psychoanalysis of the most base form. But it does help if we give a name to it.
smirkymonkey
(63,221 posts)Jim Beard
(2,535 posts)than get blindsided. This not to use it against her by any means.
busterbrown
(8,515 posts)My intentions were only to destroy right wing talking points..
specifically from that asshole Gulianni
underthematrix
(5,811 posts)the Whitewater matter. I've read a couple of books on the Clintons and Whitewater and really the author who was not a fan said there was absolutely no wrong doing. They were not involved in managing the Whitewater Dev Corp. There's no there, there.
All the stuff about Hillary intimidating the GOP women is a lie. Never happened
TexasBushwhacker
(20,190 posts)And when Bill was campaigning she said they had to deal with occassional "bimbo eruptions". "Attacks" is a bit of a stretch.
murielm99
(30,741 posts)coined that term, not Hillary.
oberliner
(58,724 posts)Not public attacks.
karynnj
(59,503 posts)letters years later. I do not know if Hillary ever used the words "bimbo eruption". Betsy Wright popularized the phrase and many people then used it. I would suspect that wife, Hillary Clinton never used it and likely found its common use painful. Think of the connotation of the words, which likely were always an exaggeration of his infidelity. I seriously doubt HRC, who sat in the 60 minutes show where he spoke of this as a painful part of the past would have used that phrase. (Not to mention, it reflects worse on Bill Clinton than anyone else.)
ColemanMaskell
(783 posts)Here's the link.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/fact-checker/wp/2016/06/29/pro-trump-groups-ad-misrepresents-hillary-clintons-comments-about-women/
And Heres a tangentially related Fact Check from the same group.
A guide to the allegations of Bill Clintons womanizing
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/fact-checker/wp/2015/12/30/a-guide-to-the-allegations-of-bill-clintons-womanizing/
jberryhill
(62,444 posts)Leith
(7,809 posts)I ask for a source that I would find credible. Since all they have are recent Breitfart or Stormfront type sources, I just tell them that they have not proved their point and that they are doing nothing but spreading malicious lies. The best part is that they get all pissed off and won't push the propaganda for a while.
busterbrown
(8,515 posts)They got nothing..
Warpy
(111,266 posts)I'm not going to bother to look it up and see if it's anywhere but some right wing blog or twitter account.
That's probably the only place any "record" of such a threat exists.