Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

mmonk

(52,589 posts)
Sun Jun 17, 2012, 07:34 AM Jun 2012

My youngest son is hopping mad.

Many of the places he used to go on the internet to research the environmental dangers of fracking for natural gas have been changed to declare it safe and also declare natural gas as a clean technology for the future. The EPA and others are for it now. Anybody else experiencing this?

11 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
My youngest son is hopping mad. (Original Post) mmonk Jun 2012 OP
There's a weird infiltration/transformation going on woo me with science Jun 2012 #1
One woud think commercials by natural gas and big oil mmonk Jun 2012 #2
Gotta spend money to make money. Robb Jun 2012 #3
Useful idiot paradigm is a coinable phrase these days. mmonk Jun 2012 #4
It's the downside of a flat playing field Robb Jun 2012 #10
Examples? Brickbat Jun 2012 #5
I like to see them myself B Calm Jun 2012 #6
I will get my son to make a list. mmonk Jun 2012 #7
Propaganda? lookingfortruth Jun 2012 #8
180 degree turns would indicate something to that effect. mmonk Jun 2012 #9
Have I missed something? SoutherDem Jun 2012 #11

woo me with science

(32,139 posts)
1. There's a weird infiltration/transformation going on
Sun Jun 17, 2012, 08:26 AM
Jun 2012

on political discussion boards, too.

Corporate tentacles run deep.

mmonk

(52,589 posts)
2. One woud think commercials by natural gas and big oil
Sun Jun 17, 2012, 08:35 AM
Jun 2012

that run every half hour on TV woud be enough. Does everything have to be so deeply corrupted?

Robb

(39,665 posts)
3. Gotta spend money to make money.
Sun Jun 17, 2012, 08:37 AM
Jun 2012

T Boone knows that well.

Also, easy PR Kung fu move when you own the media. Get ink and airtime for the nuttiest zealots with the wildest claims ("fracking kills babies dead in their cribz!!!&quot , then have a calm rational discussion about how those claims are silly-- and make sure you ignore the real problems. End result, people get the feeling things are hunky dory.

The fringe always defines the debate. Sometimes that reality gets coopted and the useful idiot paradigm comes into play.

Robb

(39,665 posts)
10. It's the downside of a flat playing field
Sun Jun 17, 2012, 09:17 AM
Jun 2012

The web model is great, everyone can get a voice. But it's also easy to cherrypicking the outliers and hold them up as representative.

mmonk

(52,589 posts)
7. I will get my son to make a list.
Sun Jun 17, 2012, 08:54 AM
Jun 2012

Seems to be everything from wikipedia to the EPA. As a frequent visitor to many environmental web sites, he claims they are all being edited or changed.

SoutherDem

(2,307 posts)
11. Have I missed something?
Sun Jun 17, 2012, 10:30 AM
Jun 2012

When did the EPA start to favor fracking?

But the oil companies are spending tons of money to give themselves a environmentally friendly image. I didn't know the EPA bought this "Brooklyn Bridge".

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»My youngest son is hoppin...