had problems. The health issue should completely dissipate as she is now out, looking and sounding healthy. It would be great if the softer tone that she is speaking in, maybe to save her throat, become the voice always used. As can be seen this week, she can say very strong serious things softly .. and they resonate. It also amplifies the difference between a reasonable, intelligent woman and a very out of control, angry, ugly man.
In recent polls taken since Thursday when she reappeared, she is improving.
The other thing to think of is that there is little to throw at her that has not been thoroughly pursued - meaning those negatives are already baked in. Not so with Trump. There is seemingly a new revelation every day. From his charity that gives other people's money .. and some of that inappropriately and illegally to his track record of not paying small businessmen, to his "University" scam, there is a wealth of things that are really NOT already baked in. Imagine commercials using credible real people who were harmed by these actions. They could be students who trusted the Trump brand and spent money and time they couldn't easily replace for something of no value or small businessmen who signed contracts and who were not paid what was agreed on - in some cases destroying previously healthy viable businesses. One consistent fact is that Trump hurt real people, trampling on them and their dreams without a thought of what he was doing.
I suspect the reason we have NOT yet seen such ads is a campaign strategic decision as to when it would be most effective. After all, think of the Kennedy and then Obama attack ads on Romney's Bain Capital sending jobs out of an Indiana town after they bought the company. In both those elections, ads on that really hurt Romney and he, unlike Trump, did not have the support of many people like those harmed. Trump's base includes many of the kind of people that he walked over without one nanosecond of concern.
= new reply since forum marked as read
