General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsStudent's grades lowered for sitting during Pledge of Allegiance
http://www.abc10.com/news/local/california/students-grades-lowered-for-sitting-during-pledge-of-allegiance/319009465My mom and my dad brought up what it meant to us and our people, Leilani said. So I just started sitting down.
But for the first time a teacher at Lower Lake High School took issue with it and docked her participation grade for not standing.
She told me I was being disrespectful and I was pretty mad, Leilani said. She was being disrespectful to me also, saying I was making bad choices, and I dont have the choice to sit during the pledge.
Gosh, I love our Blue state!
madaboutharry
(40,212 posts)Gabi Hayes
(28,795 posts)In West Virginia State Board of Education vs. Barnette (319 U.S. 624), the Supreme Court rules that requiring a person to say the pledge is violating the first and fourteenth amendments.
The case involved a Jehovah's Witness student refusing to say the pledge in schools on the grounds it was against his or her religious beliefs.
Gabi Hayes
(28,795 posts)anybody?
X_Digger
(18,585 posts)It required schools to set aside time for students to allow students to recite the pledge if they so wish.
I'm curious what whackadoo site you got that quote from, because it's grossly mischaracterized.
Hassin Bin Sober
(26,330 posts)Inaccurate because schools don't recite the pledge. Students do.
Does the law say set aside time or does it require the school to lead it???
X_Digger
(18,585 posts)Here's the text of the law in question:
II. A school district shall authorize a period of time during the school day for the recitation of the pledge of allegiance. Pupil participation in the recitation of the pledge of allegiance shall be voluntary.
Fucking duh.
Hassin Bin Sober
(26,330 posts)Gabi Hayes
(28,795 posts)care to elaborate? that's why I posted this, cause I can't reconcile the apparent conflict vis a vis precedence
X_Digger
(18,585 posts)Read the case for yourself- http://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-1st-circuit/1544507.html
Gabi Hayes
(28,795 posts)supercilious much?
fucking duh
Major Nikon
(36,827 posts)marybourg
(12,631 posts)bhikkhu
(10,718 posts)but not so much for the "flag". I always said too many people saw that waving on the other side, at bullets mowed then down (thinking of Sand Creek, Wounded Knee, etc).
napi21
(45,806 posts)Principal, School Board, SOMEBODY who will reprimand the teacher and restore the student's grades.
lindysalsagal
(20,692 posts)She'd win.
LWolf
(46,179 posts)the superintendent supporting her.
The article doesn't say anything about what grade/s might have been lowered; the only grade open to lowering for this would be citizenship, and that can obviously be argued. I doubt her grade is going to suffer when the superintendent backs her.
LeftyMom
(49,212 posts)Saw it in another article.
LWolf
(46,179 posts)Grades are given for subjects. Some places include participation in that, but it still needs a subject.
Or, maybe not. Maybe this district simply tosses "participation" onto a report card by itself?
LeftyMom
(49,212 posts)LWolf
(46,179 posts)I've only taught in 2 states, of course, not 50, but assigning academic grades for participation in activities that are not part of that academic subject is already not done in many states.
This may move the district to review a policy that allows grades to be reflected by something other than performance in that subject, especially with the superintendent sympathetic.
alarimer
(16,245 posts)Not to countries, not to people, not to anything.
Major Nikon
(36,827 posts)It's not hard to understand why. Blind devotion to anything just isn't that smart, unless you need useful idiots that will carry out your agenda without question.
LWolf
(46,179 posts)Rex
(65,616 posts)based on a teachers world view.
lindysalsagal
(20,692 posts)Blue Idaho
(5,049 posts)They need to correct the record and restore the students grade. They also need to apologize to the student in front of the class. If they won't do these two things, they should be removed from their post without pay until a judgement is made based on the contract they signed and the schools removal for cause policy.
No one loses their employment rights just because we don't like what they did.
lindysalsagal
(20,692 posts)Teachers can withold the extras, like trips, concerts, games, recess, lunch with friends, preferred seating, etc. But they cannot use grades to punish bad behaviors. Grades are earned and cannot be tampered with for any reason.
Blue Idaho
(5,049 posts)I taught for 31 years during which time I was also Division chair in my college. Rules governing High school are really no different. No matter how odeous - nothing should remove a faculty members due process rights. In the end they may very well lose their jobs for violating procedures - if remediation is not possible or warranted but all teaching jobs come with inherent rights. Even in cases of termination for cause. Some alegations may require the faculty member to be removed from their office and the campus immediately, but their due process rights remain.
Let me ask you this - in the end, as Democrats, shouldn't we want all employees to have due process rights to protect them from wrongful termination due to maternity, age, sickness, or political affialiation? In this country everyone is innocent until proven guilty - and that involves due process and protection of rights.
ronnie624
(5,764 posts)I wonder what benefit to society, patriots presume this provides.
dembotoz
(16,806 posts)i know he is a pariah here and i do not support him and all that yada yada yada
but in this case he says what he says very well in a manner that is easy to understand
https://www.facebook.com/businessinsider/videos/10153901411434071/
nolabear
(41,980 posts)Jesus, where are the standards?
Duval
(4,280 posts)I'd like to just slap her silly. This is outrageous! Does the Constitution mean nothing to her?
ChoppinBroccoli
(3,784 posts)For all the times we've stood up and recited it by rote, has anyone ever actually stopped to understand what we were SAYING? What exactly is it we're pledging our allegiance to? It ain't this country, or the Constitution that is its lifeblood, or swearing to uphold its laws, or swearing to protect this country from all enemies foreign or domestic, or anything like that. Listen to the words.
We're pledging allegiance to...........THE FLAG.
That's right. All the times we stood up and rattled it off, and all the times right-wingers lost their shit over people not wanting to say it, it was all about people pledging allegiance to a piece of cloth. A SYMBOL.
So, forgetting for a moment just how much I abhor loyalty oaths, just what exactly does it mean to pledge your loyalty to a FLAG? And what if the flag changes, as our flag has done MANY TIMES over the course of our history? It would be a different flag. Does that release us from our oath of loyalty?
Has anyone really bothered to think about what is actually going on here?
Odin2005
(53,521 posts)Gabi Hayes
(28,795 posts)have gotten yelled at for it, have cited the WVa case.
I would stand for this, though: