Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsTA-NEHISI COATES: Clinton Was Politically Incorrect, but She Wasn't Wrong About Trump's Supporters
Clinton said half of Donald Trumps supporters were prejudiced. If anything, her numbers are too low.
Political reporting, as it is now practiced, is a not built for a world where outright lying is one candidates distinguishing feature. And the problem is not limited to the lies the candidate tells, but encompasses the lies we tell ourselves about why the candidate exists in the first place.
............
As far as I can tell, none of the Trump campaign pushback to Clinton's "basket of deplorables" comments have said anything about the people Clinton was talking about not being racist, not being misogynist or by whatever definition not being 'haters.' It's not referenced once.
........
We know, for instance, some nearly 60 percent of Trumps supporters hold unfavorable views of Islam, and 76 percent support a ban on Muslims entering the United States. We know that some 40 percent of Trumps supporters believe blacks are more violent, more criminal, lazier, and ruder than whites. Two-thirds of Trumps supporters believe the first black president in this countrys history is not American. These claim are not ancillary to Donald Trumps candidacy, they are a driving force behind it.
...........
Open and acknowledged racism is, today, both seen as a disqualifying and negligible feature in civic life. By challenging the the latter part of this claim, Clinton inadvertently challenged the former. Thus a reporter or an outlet pointing out the evidenced racism of Trumps supporters in response to a statement made by his rival risks being seen as having taken a side not just against Trump, not just against racism, but against his supporters too. Would it not be better, then, to simply change the subject to one where both sides can be rendered as credible? Real and serious questions about intractable problems are thus translated into one uncontroversial question: Who will win?
It does not have to be this way. Indeed, one need not even dispense with horse-race reporting. One could ask, all at once, if Clinton was being truthful, how it will affect her chances, and what that says about the electorate. But that requires more than the current standard for political media. It means valuing more than just a sheen of objectivity but instead reporting facts in all of their disturbing reality.
the rest:
http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2016/09/basket-of-deplorables/499493/
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
1 replies, 470 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (5)
ReplyReply to this post
1 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
TA-NEHISI COATES: Clinton Was Politically Incorrect, but She Wasn't Wrong About Trump's Supporters (Original Post)
kpete
Sep 2016
OP
Dustlawyer
(10,497 posts)1. Trump supporters should like that she is "telling it like it is" and not being politically correct!
Isn't that what they say they like form the Trumpster?