General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsInside the fight to reveal the CIA's torture secrets
(Deminks posted this yesterday in Good Reads, but I missed it there. It's too important not to get read and recommended by far more people)
There was one document in particular that proved it. Jones and his team had found it years before, placed mysteriously onto a shared computer network drive the Senate intelligence committee investigators were using in northern Virginia, not far from CIA headquarters. But they hadnt appreciated its full significance until the agency, in an attempt at refuting a report that was still far from publication, told Barack Obamas staff that the committee was pushing a hysterical interpretation of the agencys fateful post-9/11 embrace of torture. The document, prepared for Leon Panetta when he was CIA director, had reached the same conclusions about the torture program that Jones had. As long as Jones had it, he would be able to show that the agency knew full well how brutal the torture was; how ineffective its torturers considered it to be; and how thoroughly the CIA had covered all of that up.
As long as Jones had the document, that is. Lurking in the back of his mind was the event that had led him to devote five years of ceaseless work, through nights and weekends: the CIA had already destroyed evidence of torture. It did that before the Senate had launched an investigation, and long before that investigation had turned acrimonious.
...
But the CIA has gone beyond successfully suppressing the report. In a grim echo of Joness fears, the agencys inspector general, Langley recently revealed, destroyed its copy allegedly an accident. Accountability for torture has been the exclusive province of a committee investigation greeted with antipathy by Obama. While Obama prides himself on ending CIA torture, the Republican presidential nominee, Donald Trump, has vowed if elected to bring back a hell of a lot worse than waterboarding. Key CIA leaders defending the agency against the committee, including Brennan and former director Michael Morrell, are reportedly seeking to run Langley under Hillary Clinton.
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/sep/09/cia-insider-daniel-jones-senate-torture-investigation
asiliveandbreathe
(8,203 posts)Charlie Pierce at Esquire raised this same story - I couldn't stop reading last night - after midnight -
I fell into the story when I read Charlies writings regarding Hillary and the NYT and washpo feud over email crap and Foundation crap - Charlie writes with a keen eye - between the lines...this link is just one of many stories..
http://www.esquire.com/news-politics/politics/news/a48468/washington-post-nytimes-clinton-email/
malaise
(269,157 posts)and it sank like a stone
muriel_volestrangler
(101,361 posts)For some strange reason, a Google search for "inside the fight to reveal" doesn't turn up your thread. Kicked and recced now, anyway.
malaise
(269,157 posts)so I'm kicking your thread
Solly Mack
(90,785 posts)malaise
(269,157 posts)Solly Mack
(90,785 posts)to fake outrage when it happens again.
malaise
(269,157 posts)It's scary though