Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Blue_Tires

(55,445 posts)
Fri Sep 9, 2016, 02:49 PM Sep 2016

TRANSPARENCY(LOL): WikiLeaks HIDES evidence of €2 billion transfer from Syria to Russia(!)

Last edited Fri Sep 9, 2016, 09:38 PM - Edit history (1)

A trove of hacked emails published by WikiLeaks in 2012 excludes records of a €2 billion transaction between the Syrian regime and a government-owned Russian bank, according to leaked U.S. court documents obtained by the Daily Dot.

WikiLeaks has become an ever-prominent force in the 2016 presidential election through its publishing of tens of thousands of emails, voicemails, and documents stolen from the Democratic National Committee by hackers that U.S. authorities and cybersecurity experts believe are linked to the Russian government. The transparency organization, which boasts of a commitment to use “cryptography to protect human rights” against repressive regimes, has faced criticism from supporters of Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton and praise from Republican opponent Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin.

The court records, placed under seal by a Manhattan federal court and obtained by the Daily Dot through an anonymous source, show in detail how a group of hacktivists breached the Syrian government’s networks on the eve of the country’s civil war and extracted emails about major bank transactions the Syrian regime was hurriedly making amid a host of economic sanctions. In the spring of 2012, most of the emails found their way into a WikiLeaks database.

But one set of emails in particular didn’t make it into the cache of documents published by WikiLeaks in July 2012 as “The Syria Files,” despite the fact that the hackers themselves were ecstatic at their discovery. The correspondence, which WikiLeaks has denied withholding, describes “more than” €2 billion ($2.4 billion, at current exchange rates) moving from the Central Bank of Syria to Russia’s VTB Bank.

http://www.dailydot.com/layer8/wikileaks-syria-files-syria-russia-bank-2-billion/


And here's the cherry: Assange told the writer not to publish because it could "help Clinton&quot !)
https://twitter.com/kevincollier/status/774306855971614720


So... Now there is indisputable evidence that Assange not only sat on something that didn't fit his agenda, he threatened retribution against those who wrote this story...Is this the beginning of the end for Julian Assange?

11 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
TRANSPARENCY(LOL): WikiLeaks HIDES evidence of €2 billion transfer from Syria to Russia(!) (Original Post) Blue_Tires Sep 2016 OP
Julian Assange is in the employ of PUTIN--as is Snowden. MADem Sep 2016 #1
Assange is an agent of Russian intelligence agencies, nothing more nt geek tragedy Sep 2016 #2
So is Trump nt Rex Sep 2016 #10
Not only is Assange a Putin bootlicker, he is human filth as well. Tarheel_Dem Sep 2016 #3
Ugh, if this story is true just "ugh". cstanleytech Sep 2016 #4
Why would they do that? Rex Sep 2016 #5
Comrade Assange and his buds are AssHats! Cryptoad Sep 2016 #6
K & R for exposure. SunSeeker Sep 2016 #7
Fuck Assange, Putin bootlicker, and rapist. joshcryer Sep 2016 #8
Well, to be fair... randome Sep 2016 #9
K&R ismnotwasm Sep 2016 #11

MADem

(135,425 posts)
1. Julian Assange is in the employ of PUTIN--as is Snowden.
Fri Sep 9, 2016, 03:02 PM
Sep 2016

It'll be revealed in the outyears, I'm betting.

For now, though, it's preferable from our standpoint to "rope a dope" and play it out from a faux position of weakness: sources and methods, and all that.

Of course, then the question must be asked, were Greenwald and Poitras useful tools, gullible nitwits, or ... what? I'm guessing they're dupes, and their sanctimony/purity of purpose were extremely useful in putting a veneer of credibility on the operation, but one never knows, do one?

 

randome

(34,845 posts)
9. Well, to be fair...
Fri Sep 9, 2016, 05:36 PM
Sep 2016

...no, I got nothin'.

Remember when 'Fuck Rand Paul' was the common refrain? Well fuck Julian Assange. He and Trump deserve one another: two publicly humiliating losers.
[hr][font color="blue"][center]Everything is a satellite to some other thing.[/center][/font][hr]

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»TRANSPARENCY(LOL): WikiLe...