General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsTRANSPARENCY(LOL): WikiLeaks HIDES evidence of €2 billion transfer from Syria to Russia(!)
Last edited Fri Sep 9, 2016, 09:38 PM - Edit history (1)
A trove of hacked emails published by WikiLeaks in 2012 excludes records of a 2 billion transaction between the Syrian regime and a government-owned Russian bank, according to leaked U.S. court documents obtained by the Daily Dot.
WikiLeaks has become an ever-prominent force in the 2016 presidential election through its publishing of tens of thousands of emails, voicemails, and documents stolen from the Democratic National Committee by hackers that U.S. authorities and cybersecurity experts believe are linked to the Russian government. The transparency organization, which boasts of a commitment to use cryptography to protect human rights against repressive regimes, has faced criticism from supporters of Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton and praise from Republican opponent Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin.
The court records, placed under seal by a Manhattan federal court and obtained by the Daily Dot through an anonymous source, show in detail how a group of hacktivists breached the Syrian governments networks on the eve of the countrys civil war and extracted emails about major bank transactions the Syrian regime was hurriedly making amid a host of economic sanctions. In the spring of 2012, most of the emails found their way into a WikiLeaks database.
But one set of emails in particular didnt make it into the cache of documents published by WikiLeaks in July 2012 as The Syria Files, despite the fact that the hackers themselves were ecstatic at their discovery. The correspondence, which WikiLeaks has denied withholding, describes more than 2 billion ($2.4 billion, at current exchange rates) moving from the Central Bank of Syria to Russias VTB Bank.
http://www.dailydot.com/layer8/wikileaks-syria-files-syria-russia-bank-2-billion/
And here's the cherry: Assange told the writer not to publish because it could "help Clinton" !)
https://twitter.com/kevincollier/status/774306855971614720
So... Now there is indisputable evidence that Assange not only sat on something that didn't fit his agenda, he threatened retribution against those who wrote this story...Is this the beginning of the end for Julian Assange?
MADem
(135,425 posts)It'll be revealed in the outyears, I'm betting.
For now, though, it's preferable from our standpoint to "rope a dope" and play it out from a faux position of weakness: sources and methods, and all that.
Of course, then the question must be asked, were Greenwald and Poitras useful tools, gullible nitwits, or ... what? I'm guessing they're dupes, and their sanctimony/purity of purpose were extremely useful in putting a veneer of credibility on the operation, but one never knows, do one?
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)Rex
(65,616 posts)nt
Tarheel_Dem
(31,237 posts)cstanleytech
(26,316 posts)Rex
(65,616 posts)Cryptoad
(8,254 posts)SunSeeker
(51,657 posts)joshcryer
(62,276 posts)randome
(34,845 posts)...no, I got nothin'.
Remember when 'Fuck Rand Paul' was the common refrain? Well fuck Julian Assange. He and Trump deserve one another: two publicly humiliating losers.
[hr][font color="blue"][center]Everything is a satellite to some other thing.[/center][/font][hr]