General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsTrump Makes White Nationalist Proposal; Media Doesn’t Notice
Weve admitted 59 million immigrants to the United States between 1965 and 2015. Many of these arrivals have greatly enriched our country. So true. But we now have an obligation to them and to their children to control future immigration as we are following, if you think, previous immigration waves...
To keep immigration levels measured by population share within historical norms. To select immigrants based on their likelihood of success in U.S. society and their ability to be financially self- sufficient.
We take anybody. Come on in, anybody. Just come on in. Not anymore.
Whats he mean by 1965? Well, reading most of the news, this morning, youd never know. But I guarantee you that most KKK members and neo-Nazis know exactly what he is talking about.
In 1965, we passed the Immigration and Nationality Act. That law essentially repealed the crux of a 1920s law called the Emergency Quota Act.
The Emergency Quota Act (and a 1924 bill that slightly amended it) set quotas on immigration that were based on the number of people of a nationality currently in a country. The effect and intent of the law was abundantly clear. America was mostly white and European, and the law was going to keep it that way, by putting low and hard caps on others, while opening the doors to more white Europeans.
...
So, when Donald Trump points to 1965 and says we need to reform that law, To keep immigration levels measured by population share within historical norms, he means, We need to keep America from becoming any more less white than it currently is.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/eric-schmeltzer/trump-makes-white-nationa_b_11814808.html
He goes on to show the white supremacists know all about 1965. PZ Myers has more, from Steven Gould's The Mismeasure of Man:
Tommy_Carcetti
(43,198 posts)Am I right, Donald?
Scarsdale
(9,426 posts)Are they doing work American women are unqualified for? Maybe only with tRump? White Europeans mostly have superior social services, healthcare childcare, vacation time. Why would they WANT to come to a country that elects people such as Dubya and tRump? Where is Mrs. tRump - deported? Did he return her for a refund, or a younger model?
malaise
(269,172 posts)K & R
Ilsa
(61,698 posts)My guess is there is less traffic today.
But I could be wrong about that.
malaise
(269,172 posts)awoke_in_2003
(34,582 posts)He's traded in the dog whistle for a marching band, and TV media (and most print) will ignore it
malaise
(269,172 posts)Blue Idaho
(5,057 posts)Wouldn't it be nice if we had a free and informed press that would report on Trump's white supremacist proposals?
mountain grammy
(26,655 posts)we hear you, Donald. We'll start by keeping "them" out and end with a holocaust, and there are plenty of Americans signing up for that.
PatSeg
(47,602 posts)I didn't know that about 1965.
"So true" - clearly he didn't write that. He says that like he's reading it for the first time. He did the same thing when he spoke at the church in Detroit.
Tanuki
(14,921 posts)greatlaurel
(2,004 posts)Some of the talking heads will not understand it and some of the talking heads agree with Trump.
Great post. Thanks! I love PZ Myers. His blog is outstanding.
forest444
(5,902 posts)as well as other Mediterranean nationalities (Spanish, Greek, Yugoslavian, etc.) and Eastern Europeans.
It's a prescient point even now because for decades, voters in many of the ethnicities listed above were staunchly Republican (often for cultural/religious reasons) - but the Republican "base" never really welcomed them at all.
In fact, the really hard-right element in the GOP base (30-50% of the party) often doesn't even consider Southern or Eastern Europeans "white."
annabanana
(52,791 posts)I would never have caught that 1965 date...
malaise
(269,172 posts)Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)Everyone like up for your DNA screening.
We don't want any "trick babies".
Kathy M
(1,242 posts)Thank You for posting
BumRushDaShow
(129,491 posts)that many of the ones pushing for this, including Drumpf, came from families who only came here in the early 20th century. The New York Public Library has a good summary site on immigration history -
<...>
With the exception of Irish Catholics, the majority of immigrants before 1882 were Protestants from Northern and Western Europe. By 1907, three out of four immigrants were Catholics and Jews from Southern and Eastern Europe.
The 1924 Immigration Act passed by Congress targeted specific nationalities with quota restrictions. The number of newcomers from Southern and Eastern Europeans nations allowed into the U.S. would now be limited to 2% of the total number of people from those origin countries listed in the 1890 United States census. For example, if one million individuals were listed in the 1890 federal census as born in Italy, then only 20,000 Italians would be allowed entry into the United States annually after 1924.
The 1930s were characterized by more departures from the U.S. than arrivals, while quota laws, World War II, internment camps, and the suppression of ethnicities of wartime enemies were some of the factors causing levels of immigration to decrease.
<...>
https://www.nypl.org/blog/2016/07/01/us-immigration-history
icymist
(15,888 posts)after being heavily damaged in a fire at the Commerce Building in January, 1921.
Most of the census' population schedules were badly damaged by a fire in the Commerce Department Building in January 1921
A newspaper photograph captured the scene after a
devastating fire and pointed out the need for safe
storage of national records.
Photo courtesy of the National Archives.
https://www.census.gov/history/www/genealogy/decennial_census_records/availability_of_1890_census.html
Still no appropriation for an archives was forthcoming. By May of 1921 the records were still piled in a large warehouse where, complained new census director William Steuart, they could not be consulted and would probably gradually deteriorate. Steuart arranged for their transfer back to the census building, to be bound where possible, but at least put in some order for reference.(24)
The extant record is scanty on storage and possible use of the 1890 schedules between 1922 and 1932 and seemingly silent on what precipitated the following chain of events. In December 1932, in accordance with federal records procedures at the time, the Chief Clerk of the Bureau of Census sent the Librarian of Congress a list of papers no longer necessary for current business and scheduled for destruction. He asked the Librarian to report back to him any documents that should be retained for their historical interest. Item 22 on the list for Bureau of the Census read "Schedules, Population . . . 1890, Original." The Librarian identified no records as permanent, the list was sent forward, and Congress authorized destruction on February 21, 1933. At least one report states the 1890 census papers were finally destroyed in 1935, and a small scribbled note found in a Census Bureau file states "remaining schedules destroyed by Department of Commerce in 1934 (not approved by the Geographer)." 25) Further study is necessary to determine, if possible, what happened to the fervent and vigilant voices that championed these schedules in 1921. How were these records overlooked by Library of Congress staff? Who in the Census Bureau determined the schedules were useless, why, and when? Ironically, just one day before Congress authorized destruction of the 1890 census papers, President Herbert Hoover laid the cornerstone for the National Archives Building
http://www.archives.gov/publications/prologue/1996/spring/1890-census-1.html
loyalsister
(13,390 posts)in june of 1964. It's also no accident that the 50s era that predates the national recognized civil rights movement is considered a golden age.
Beartracks
(12,821 posts)===============
muriel_volestrangler
(101,361 posts)Burnett: Is There Any Way To Interpret That Other Than Keep This Country White?
BURNETT: So let me ask you, when Trump said -- and you just heard him there in Trump's piece -- he said, "to keep immigration levels, measured by population share, within historical norms", what is he saying? Because historically that would mean that you're going to preserve a white country. If it changes and you have more people who are not white that want to come into the United States, this country could become white unless you were to keep immigration levels measured by population share within historical norms. Is that a white supremacist thing to say?
MICHAEL FLYNN: I don't know the details of that so you've got me on that one there.
[...]
BURNETT: I know you said this is sort of beyond your area, but 'to keep immigration levels measured by population share within historical norms'? Is there any way to interpret that other than to keep this country white?
FLYNN: I don't know. I don't know. I think what you'd have to do is you have to look at how do we currently do it, and the way we currently bring immigrants into this country and then take people through the legal process which I believe takes about 18 months on average. That's what I believe. I think that that system is obviously not working, and the number of individuals in this country that stay beyond their visa period that are here, again, illegally, I mean, we have to fix this problem. We have to have security in this country. If we don't, then we don't have a country.
http://mediamatters.org/video/2016/09/01/cnns-erin-burnett-presses-trump-advisor-his-appeal-white-supremacists-and-kkk/212827
malaise
(269,172 posts)Kick
BYJ439
(27 posts)Drumpf is just following the footsteps of his KKK father. I'm surprised he hasn't started wearing a white robe and hood at his rallies yet. Or better yet, donned himself in blackface, as part of his black American "outreach". Sickening man.
But 40 percent of this country will vote for this imbecile. Sad.
colsohlibgal
(5,275 posts)Seig Heil, we are in a nation full of reactionaries and/or the brain dead.